Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 134

1.

Application of wavelets to the evaluation of phantom images for mammography quality control.

Alvarez M, Pina DR, Miranda JR, Duarte SB.

Phys Med Biol. 2012 Nov 7;57(21):7177-90. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/21/7177. Epub 2012 Oct 12.

PMID:
23060095
2.

How good is the ACR accreditation phantom for assessing image quality in digital mammography?

Huda W, Sajewicz AM, Ogden KM, Scalzetti EM, Dance DR.

Acad Radiol. 2002 Jul;9(7):764-72.

PMID:
12139090
3.

A comparative study of computer assisted assessment of image quality index for mammographic phantom images.

Mayo P, Rodenas F, Verdú G, Villaescusa JI, Campayo JM.

Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;116(1-4 Pt 2):620-3.

PMID:
16604712
4.

Analysis of digital image quality indexes for CIRS SP01 and CDMAM 3.4 mammographic phantoms.

Mayo P, Rodenas F, Verdú G, Campayo JM, Villaescusa JI.

Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:418-21. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4649179.

PMID:
19162682
5.

Evaluation of mammographic image quality: pilot study comparing five methods.

Caldwell CB, Fishell EK, Jong RA, Weiser WJ, Yaffe MJ.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992 Aug;159(2):295-301.

PMID:
1632343
6.

Mammography dosimetry using an in-house developed polymethyl methacrylate phantom.

Sharma R, Sharma SD, Mayya YS, Chourasiya G.

Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012 Aug;151(2):379-85. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncr476. Epub 2012 Jan 9.

PMID:
22232773
7.

Subjective evaluations of mammographic accreditation phantom images by three observer groups.

Brooks KW, Trueblood JH, Kearfott KJ.

Invest Radiol. 1994 Jan;29(1):42-7.

PMID:
8144336
8.

Which phantom is better for assessing the image quality in full-field digital mammography?: American College of Radiology Accreditation phantom versus digital mammography accreditation phantom.

Song SE, Seo BK, Yie A, Ku BK, Kim HY, Cho KR, Chung HH, Lee SH, Hwang KW.

Korean J Radiol. 2012 Nov-Dec;13(6):776-83. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.6.776. Epub 2012 Oct 12.

9.

Computerized scheme for evaluating mammographic phantom images.

Asahara M, Kodera Y.

Med Phys. 2012 Mar;39(3):1609-17. doi: 10.1118/1.3687159.

PMID:
22380393
10.

Dose sensitivity of three phantoms used for quality assurance in digital mammography.

Figl M, Semturs F, Kaar M, Hoffmann R, Kaldarar H, Homolka P, Mostbeck G, Scholz B, Hummel J.

Phys Med Biol. 2013 Jan 21;58(2):N13-23. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/2/N13. Epub 2012 Dec 21.

PMID:
23257608
11.
12.

Are phantoms useful for predicting the potential of dose reduction in full-field digital mammography?

Gennaro G, Katz L, Souchay H, Alberelli C, di Maggio C.

Phys Med Biol. 2005 Apr 21;50(8):1851-70. Epub 2005 Apr 6.

PMID:
15815100
13.

A phantom using titanium and Landolt rings for image quality evaluation in mammography.

de las Heras H, Schöfer F, Tiller B, Chevalier M, Zwettler G, Semturs F.

Phys Med Biol. 2013 Apr 21;58(8):L17-30. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/8/L17. Epub 2013 Mar 26.

PMID:
23528479
14.

Automated analysis of the American College of Radiology mammographic accreditation phantom images.

Brooks KW, Trueblood JH, Kearfott KJ, Lawton DT.

Med Phys. 1997 May;24(5):709-23.

15.

Image-quality figure evaluator based on contrast-detail phantom in radiography.

Wang CL, Wang CM, Chan YK, Chen RT.

Int J Med Robot. 2012 Jun;8(2):169-77. doi: 10.1002/rcs.444. Epub 2011 Dec 30.

PMID:
22213357
16.

Computerized quantitative evaluation of mammographic accreditation phantom images.

Lee Y, Tsai DY, Shinohara N.

Med Phys. 2010 Dec;37(12):6323-31.

PMID:
21302789
17.

Evaluation of equipment performance, patient dose, imaging quality, and diagnostic coincidence in five Mexico City mammography services.

Brandan ME, Ruiz-Trejo C, Verdejo-Silva M, Guevara M, Lozano-Zalce H, Madero-Preciado L, Martín J, Noel-Etienne LM, Ramírez-Arias JL, Soto J, Villaseñor Y.

Arch Med Res. 2004 Jan-Feb;35(1):24-30.

PMID:
15036796
18.

[Quality control of mammography: potential use of a new device for testing the image quality and the dose].

Di Maggio C, Gennaro G, Gambaccini M, Cattozzo S.

Radiol Med. 1996 Sep;92(3):261-6. Italian.

PMID:
8975313
19.

Mammographic image restoration using maximum entropy deconvolution.

Jannetta A, Jackson JC, Kotre CJ, Birch IP, Robson KJ, Padgett R.

Phys Med Biol. 2004 Nov 7;49(21):4997-5010.

PMID:
15584533
20.

Survey of mammography practice in Croatia: equipment performance, image quality and dose.

Faj D, Posedel D, Stimac D, Ivezic Z, Kasabasic M, Ivkovic A, Kubelka D, Ilakovac V, Brnic Z, Bjelac OC.

Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;131(4):535-40. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncn283. Epub 2008 Oct 21.

PMID:
18940818

Supplemental Content

Support Center