Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 356

1.

Comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam for conscious sedation in dental surgery monitored by bispectral index.

Fan TW, Ti LK, Islam I.

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jul;51(5):428-33. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Oct 8.

PMID:
23058230
2.

Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in outpatient third molar surgery.

Ustün Y, Gündüz M, Erdoğan O, Benlidayi ME.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Sep;64(9):1353-8.

PMID:
16916668
3.

A comparative evaluation of intranasal dexmedetomidine, midazolam and ketamine for their sedative and analgesic properties: a triple blind randomized study.

Surendar MN, Pandey RK, Saksena AK, Kumar R, Chandra G.

J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014 Spring;38(3):255-61.

PMID:
25095322
4.

Bispectral index-guided intraoperative sedation with dexmedetomidine and midazolam infusion in outpatient cataract surgery.

Apan A, Doganci N, Ergan A, Büyükkoçak U.

Minerva Anestesiol. 2009 May;75(5):239-44. Epub 2008 Dec 17.

5.

A comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam for sedation in third molar surgery.

Cheung CW, Ying CL, Chiu WK, Wong GT, Ng KF, Irwin MG.

Anaesthesia. 2007 Nov;62(11):1132-8.

6.

Intravenous sedation for implant surgery: midazolam, butorphanol, and dexmedetomidine versus midazolam, butorphanol, and propofol.

Kawaai H, Tomita S, Nakaike Y, Ganzberg S, Yamazaki S.

J Oral Implantol. 2014 Feb;40(1):94-102. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00200. Epub 2011 Dec 29.

PMID:
22206410
7.

Improved sedation with dexmedetomidine-remifentanil compared with midazolam-remifentanil during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a randomized, controlled trial.

Cho JS, Shim JK, Na S, Park I, Kwak YL.

Europace. 2014 Jul;16(7):1000-6. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut365. Epub 2013 Dec 30.

PMID:
24381332
8.

A comparison of midazolam and midazolam with remifentanil for patient-controlled sedation during operations on third molars.

Garip H, Gürkan Y, Toker K, Göker K.

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Apr;45(3):212-6. Epub 2006 Aug 23.

PMID:
16930785
9.

Utility of bispectral index monitoring during intravenous sedation in the dental office.

Munoz Garcia J, Vidal Marcos AV, Restoy Lozano A, Gasco Garcia C.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Mar-Apr;27(2):375-82.

PMID:
22442778
10.

Comparing efficacy and safety of four intravenous sedation regimens in dental outpatients.

Dionne RA, Yagiela JA, Moore PA, Gonty A, Zuniga J, Beirne OR.

J Am Dent Assoc. 2001 Jun;132(6):740-51.

PMID:
11433853
11.

Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Sheta SA, Al-Sarheed MA, Abdelhalim AA.

Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 Feb;24(2):181-9. doi: 10.1111/pan.12287. Epub 2013 Nov 15.

PMID:
24237879
12.

The safety and efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine during electrochemotherapy for facial vascular malformation: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial.

Zhang X, Bai X, Zhang Q, Wang X, Lu L.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Nov;71(11):1835-42. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.06.202. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

PMID:
23945510
13.

Prolonged recovery associated with dexmedetomidine when used as a sole sedative agent in office-based oral and maxillofacial surgery procedures.

Makary L, Vornik V, Finn R, Lenkovsky F, McClelland AL, Thurmon J, Robertson B.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Feb;68(2):386-91. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.107.

PMID:
20116712
14.

A comparison of dexmedetomidine sedation with and without midazolam for dental implant surgery.

Wakita R, Kohase H, Fukayama H.

Anesth Prog. 2012 Summer;59(2):62-8. doi: 10.2344/11-11.1.

15.

Midazolam with meperidine and dexmedetomidine vs. midazolam with meperidine for sedation during ERCP: prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial.

Lee BS, Ryu J, Lee SH, Lee MG, Jang SE, Hwang JH, Ryu JK, Do SH, Kim YT.

Endoscopy. 2014 Apr;46(4):291-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1358909. Epub 2014 Mar 26.

PMID:
24671858
16.

A comparison of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation, pain and hemodynamic control, during colonoscopy under conscious sedation.

Dere K, Sucullu I, Budak ET, Yeyen S, Filiz AI, Ozkan S, Dagli G.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jul;27(7):648-52. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283347bfe.

PMID:
20531094
17.

A Phase IIIb, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study evaluating the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine for sedation during awake fiberoptic intubation.

Bergese SD, Candiotti KA, Bokesch PM, Zura A, Wisemandle W, Bekker AY; AWAKE Study Group.

Am J Ther. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):586-95. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181d69072.

PMID:
20535016
18.

The comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam used for sedation of patients during upper endoscopy: A prospective, randomized study.

Demiraran Y, Korkut E, Tamer A, Yorulmaz I, Kocaman B, Sezen G, Akcan Y.

Can J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jan;21(1):25-9.

19.

Assessment of recovery in patients undergoing intravenous conscious sedation using bispectral analysis.

Sandler NA, Hodges J, Sabino M.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Jun;59(6):603-11; discussion 611-2.

PMID:
11381378
20.

Multidrug intravenous sedation: determinants of the sedative dose of midazolam.

Moore PA, Finder RL, Jackson DL.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997 Jul;84(1):5-10.

PMID:
9247941

Supplemental Content

Support Center