Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 139

1.

A comprehensive assessment of the precision and agreement of anterior corneal power measurements obtained using 8 different devices.

Wang Q, Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Xu Z, Feng Y, Wen D, Hua Y, Yang F, Pan C, Huang J.

PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045607. Epub 2012 Sep 25.

2.

Precision (Repeatability and Reproducibility) and Agreement of Corneal Power Measurements Obtained by Topcon KR-1W and iTrace.

Hua Y, Xu Z, Qiu W, Wu Q.

PLoS One. 2016 Jan 11;11(1):e0147086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147086. eCollection 2016.

3.

Precision and agreement of corneal power measurements obtained using a new corneal topographer OphthaTOP.

Huang J, Savini G, Chen H, Bao F, Li Y, Chen H, Lu W, Yu Y, Wang Q.

PLoS One. 2015 Jan 5;10(1):e109414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109414. eCollection 2015.

4.

Repeatability and inter-device agreement for three different methods of keratometry: Placido, Scheimpflug, and color LED corneal topography.

Hidalgo IR, Rozema JJ, Dhubhghaill SN, Zakaria N, Koppen C, Tassignon MJ.

J Refract Surg. 2015 Mar;31(3):176-81. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20150224-01.

PMID:
25751834
5.

Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of corneal power measurements obtained with a new corneal topographer.

Mao X, Savini G, Zhuo Z, Feng Y, Zhang J, Wang Q, Chen H, Huang J.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Oct;39(10):1561-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.04.029. Epub 2013 Jul 13.

PMID:
23860010
6.

Repeatability and agreement of Scheimpflug-based and swept-source optical biometry measurements.

Sel S, Stange J, Kaiser D, Kiraly L.

Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017 Oct;40(5):318-322. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 23.

PMID:
28342729
7.

Repeatability and agreement of five imaging systems for measuring anterior segment parameters in healthy eyes.

Kumar M, Shetty R, Jayadev C, Rao HL, Dutta D.

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr;65(4):288-294. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_729_16.

8.

Precision of a new Scheimpflug and Placido-disk analyzer in measuring corneal thickness and agreement with ultrasound pachymetry.

Huang J, Savini G, Hu L, Hoffer KJ, Lu W, Feng Y, Yang F, Hu X, Wang Q.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Feb;39(2):219-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.10.034. Epub 2012 Dec 3.

PMID:
23218819
9.

Comparison of reliability and repeatability of corneal curvature assessment with six keratometers.

Hamer CA, Buckhurst H, Purslow C, Shum GL, Habib NE, Buckhurst PJ.

Clin Exp Optom. 2016 Nov;99(6):583-589. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12329. Epub 2016 Jul 10.

PMID:
27397501
10.

Repeatability and comparability of anterior segment biometry obtained by the Sirius and the Pentacam analyzers.

De la Parra-Colín P, Garza-León M, Barrientos-Gutierrez T.

Int Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;34(1):27-33. doi: 10.1007/s10792-013-9780-0. Epub 2013 Apr 25.

PMID:
23616225
11.

Repeatability of the Sirius imaging system and agreement with the Pentacam HR.

Nasser CK, Singer R, Barkana Y, Zadok D, Avni I, Goldich Y.

J Refract Surg. 2012 Jul;28(7):493-7. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20120619-01.

PMID:
22767167
12.

Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Agreement of Two Scheimpflug-Placido Anterior Corneal Analyzers for Posterior Corneal Surface Measurement.

Bao F, Savini G, Shu B, Zhu S, Gao R, Dang G, Yu A, Wang Q, Huang J.

J Refract Surg. 2017 Aug 1;33(8):524-530. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170606-01.

PMID:
28787517
13.

Comparison and repeatability of keratometric and corneal power measurements obtained by Orbscan II, Pentacam, and Galilei corneal tomography systems.

Crawford AZ, Patel DV, McGhee CN.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;156(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.01.029. Epub 2013 Mar 28.

PMID:
23540708
14.

Comparison of keratometry and white-to-white measurements obtained by Lenstar with those obtained by autokeratometry and corneal topography.

Huang J, Savini G, Su B, Zhu R, Feng Y, Lin S, Chen H, Wang Q.

Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2015 Oct;38(5):363-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 May 5.

PMID:
25956573
15.

Keratometry with five different techniques: a study of device repeatability and inter-device agreement.

Mehravaran S, Asgari S, Bigdeli S, Shahnazi A, Hashemi H.

Int Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;34(4):869-75. doi: 10.1007/s10792-013-9895-3. Epub 2014 Feb 23.

PMID:
24562593
16.

Comparison of keratometric data obtained by automated keratometer, Dicon CT 200, Allegro Topolyzer, and Pentacam.

Gonen T, Cosar CB, Sener B, Keskinbora KH.

J Refract Surg. 2012 Aug;28(8):557-61. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20120723-04.

PMID:
22869234
17.

Repeatability of Wavefront Aberration Measurements With a Placido-Based Topographer in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes.

Ortiz-Toquero S, Rodriguez G, de Juan V, Martin R.

J Refract Surg. 2016 May 1;32(5):338-44. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160121-04.

PMID:
27163620
18.

Repeatability and Agreement of Orbscan II, Pentacam HR, and Galilei Tomography Systems in Corneas With Keratoconus.

Meyer JJ, Gokul A, Vellara HR, Prime Z, McGhee CN.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar;175:122-128. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.12.003. Epub 2016 Dec 18.

PMID:
27993593
19.

A novel Hartman Shack-based topography system: repeatability and agreement for corneal power with Scheimpflug+Placido topographer and rotating prism auto-keratorefractor.

Prakash G, Srivastava D, Choudhuri S.

Int Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec;35(6):869-80. doi: 10.1007/s10792-015-0065-7. Epub 2015 Mar 28.

PMID:
25820517
20.

Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of ocular parameters obtained by the Tomey OA-2000 biometer compared to the IOLMaster in healthy eyes.

Hua Y, Qiu W, Xiao Q, Wu Q.

PLoS One. 2018 Feb 27;13(2):e0193023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193023. eCollection 2018.

Supplemental Content

Support Center