Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 96

1.

Five reasons that many comparative effectiveness studies fail to change patient care and clinical practice.

Timbie JW, Fox DS, Van Busum K, Schneider EC.

Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Oct;31(10):2168-75. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0150. Erratum in: Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Oct;31(10):2831.

2.

Applying research evidence to prehospital and disaster medicine.

Stratton SJ.

Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013 Apr;28(2):85-6. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X12001860. Epub 2013 Jan 14. No abstract available.

PMID:
23312527
3.

Hospital-based comparative effectiveness centers: translating research into practice to improve the quality, safety and value of patient care.

Umscheid CA, Williams K, Brennan PJ.

J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Dec;25(12):1352-5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1476-9. Epub 2010 Aug 10.

4.

Moving comparative effectiveness research into practice: implementation science and the role of academic medicine.

Bonham AC, Solomon MZ.

Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Oct;29(10):1901-5. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0790.

5.

Limited information technology for patient care in physician offices.

Reed MC, Grossman JM.

Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2004 Sep;(89):1-6.

PMID:
15462047
6.

Comparative effectiveness research, technological abandonment, and health care spending.

Howard DH, Shen YC.

Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2012;23:103-21.

PMID:
23156662
7.
8.

Computer-based patient records and changing physicians' practice patterns.

Anderson JG.

Top Health Inf Manage. 1994 Aug;15(1):10-23. Review.

PMID:
10135719
9.

Academic detailing can play a key role in assessing and implementing comparative effectiveness research findings.

Fischer MA, Avorn J.

Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Oct;31(10):2206-12. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0817.

10.

How do we involve patients in their own healthcare decisions?

Clancy C.

MedGenMed. 2007 Nov 30;9(4):46. No abstract available.

11.
12.

Factors affecting the uptake of new medicines in secondary care - a literature review.

Chauhan D, Mason A.

J Clin Pharm Ther. 2008 Aug;33(4):339-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.00925.x. Review.

PMID:
18613851
13.

Outcomes of adoption: measuring evidence uptake by individuals and organizations.

Donaldson NE, Rutledge DN, Ashley J.

Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004;1 Suppl 1:S41-51. Review.

PMID:
17129334
14.

Readers' and author's responses to "The disappearing patient".

Joseph SA.

MedGenMed. 2007 Oct 18;9(4):14; author reply 14. No abstract available.

15.

New medicines in primary care: a review of influences on general practitioner prescribing.

Mason A.

J Clin Pharm Ther. 2008 Feb;33(1):1-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.00875.x. Review.

PMID:
18211610
16.

Rethinking medical professionalism: the role of information technology and practice innovations.

Mechanic D.

Milbank Q. 2008 Jun;86(2):327-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2008.00523.x.

17.
18.

The effects of payment method on clinical decision-making: physician responses to clinical scenarios.

Shen J, Andersen R, Brook R, Kominski G, Albert PS, Wenger N.

Med Care. 2004 Mar;42(3):297-302.

PMID:
15076830
19.

Readers' and author's responses to "The disappearing patient".

Magder DM.

MedGenMed. 2007;9(4):14; author reply 14. No abstract available.

PMID:
18320628
20.

Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.

Schor EL; American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on the Family.

Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.

PMID:
12777595
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk