Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 71

1.

Induced G1 phase arrest of fast-dividing cells improves the quality of genomic profiles generated by array-CGH.

Manukjan G, Tauscher M, Ripperger T, Schwarzer A, Schlegelberger B, Steinemann D.

Biotechniques. 2012 Oct;53(4):245-8. doi: 10.2144/0000113938.

2.

Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer.

Kloth JN, Oosting J, van Wezel T, Szuhai K, Knijnenburg J, Gorter A, Kenter GG, Fleuren GJ, Jordanova ES.

BMC Genomics. 2007 Feb 20;8:53.

3.

[Analysis of genomic copy number alterations of malignant lymphomas and its application for diagnosis].

Tagawa H.

Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2007 Jul;34(7):975-82. Review. Japanese.

PMID:
17637530
4.

Integrated analysis of copy number alteration and RNA expression profiles of cancer using a high-resolution whole-genome oligonucleotide array.

Jung SH, Shin SH, Yim SH, Choi HS, Lee SH, Chung YJ.

Exp Mol Med. 2009 Jul 31;41(7):462-70. doi: 10.3858/emm.2009.41.7.051.

5.

Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays.

Pollack JR, Perou CM, Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Pergamenschikov A, Williams CF, Jeffrey SS, Botstein D, Brown PO.

Nat Genet. 1999 Sep;23(1):41-6.

PMID:
10471496
6.

High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.

Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, Clark S, Poole I, Kowbel D, Collins C, Kuo WL, Chen C, Zhai Y, Dairkee SH, Ljung BM, Gray JW, Albertson DG.

Nat Genet. 1998 Oct;20(2):207-11.

PMID:
9771718
7.

Estimation of tumor heterogeneity using CGH array data.

Wang K, Li J, Li S, Bolund L, Wiuf C.

BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Jan 9;10:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-12.

8.

Evaluation of the efficacy of constitutional array-based comparative genomic hybridization in the diagnosis of aneuploidy using genomic and amplified DNA.

Tan NH, Palmer R, Wang R.

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010 Feb;36(1):19-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2009.01110.x.

PMID:
20178523
9.

High-resolution copy number profiling by array CGH using DNA isolated from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues.

van Essen HF, Ylstra B.

Methods Mol Biol. 2012;838:329-41. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-507-7_16.

PMID:
22228020
10.

Identifying cancer-related genes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines using DNA and mRNA expression profiling analyses.

Guo X, Lui WO, Qian CN, Chen JD, Gray SG, Rhodes D, Haab B, Stanbridge E, Wang H, Hong MH, Min HQ, Larsson C, Teh BT.

Int J Oncol. 2002 Dec;21(6):1197-204.

PMID:
12429968
11.

Across array comparative genomic hybridization: a strategy to reduce reference channel hybridizations.

Buffart TE, Israeli D, Tijssen M, Vosse SJ, Mrsić A, Meijer GA, Ylstra B.

Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2008 Nov;47(11):994-1004. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20605.

PMID:
18663753
12.

The potential of copy number gains and losses, detected by array-based comparative genomic hybridization, for computational differential diagnosis of B-cell lymphomas and genetic regions involved in lymphomagenesis.

Takeuchi I, Tagawa H, Tsujikawa A, Nakagawa M, Katayama-Suguro M, Guo Y, Seto M.

Haematologica. 2009 Jan;94(1):61-9. doi: 10.3324/haematol.12986. Epub 2008 Nov 23.

13.

Bladder cancer stage and outcome by array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Blaveri E, Brewer JL, Roydasgupta R, Fridlyand J, DeVries S, Koppie T, Pejavar S, Mehta K, Carroll P, Simko JP, Waldman FM.

Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Oct 1;11(19 Pt 1):7012-22.

14.

Differential gene alteration among hepatoma cell lines demonstrated by cDNA microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Kawaguchi K, Honda M, Yamashita T, Shirota Y, Kaneko S.

Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005 Apr 1;329(1):370-80.

PMID:
15721316
15.

Array CGH analysis in high-risk pregnancies: comparing DNA from cultured cells and cell-free fetal DNA.

Gruchy N, Decamp M, Richard N, Jeanne-Pasquier C, Benoist G, Mittre H, Leporrier N.

Prenat Diagn. 2012 Apr;32(4):383-8. doi: 10.1002/pd.2861. Epub 2011 Oct 24.

PMID:
22025315
16.

[Genomic profiling: from molecular cytogenetics to DNA arrays].

Theillet C, Orsetti B, Redon R, Manoir SD.

Bull Cancer. 2001 Mar;88(3):261-8. Review. French.

17.

Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) as a useful tool for identifying genes involved in Glioblastoma (GB).

Ruano Y, Mollejo M, de Lope AR, Hernández-Moneo JL, Martínez P, Meléndez B.

Methods Mol Biol. 2010;653:35-45. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-759-4_3. Review.

PMID:
20721736
18.

[Array-based comparative genomic hybridization detection of copy number variations in a fetus with hypoplastic left-heart syndrome].

Wang Y, Ma DY, Yang YQ, Zhou J, Zhou XY, Ji XQ, Chen J, Cao L, Hu P, Xu ZF.

Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Aug;29(4):439-42. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9406.2012.04.013. Chinese.

PMID:
22875502
19.

Recent advances in array comparative genomic hybridization technologies and their applications in human genetics.

Lockwood WW, Chari R, Chi B, Lam WL.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2006 Feb;14(2):139-48. Review.

20.

waviCGH: a web application for the analysis and visualization of genomic copy number alterations.

Carro A, Rico D, Rueda OM, Díaz-Uriarte R, Pisano DG.

Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Jul;38(Web Server issue):W182-7. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq441. Epub 2010 May 27.

Supplemental Content

Support Center