Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 139

1.

Prediction of coexistent carcinomas risks by subjective EIN diagnosis and comparison with WHO classification in endometrial hyperplasias.

Yang YF, Liao YY, Peng NF, Li LQ, Xie SR, Wang RB.

Pathol Res Pract. 2012 Dec 15;208(12):708-12. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2012.08.009. Epub 2012 Oct 6.

PMID:
23044462
3.

Pax2 expression in simultaneously diagnosed WHO and EIN classification systems.

Joiner AK, Quick CM, Jeffus SK.

Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2015 Jan;34(1):40-6. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000185.

PMID:
25473752
4.

The molecular genetics and morphometry-based endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia classification system predicts disease progression in endometrial hyperplasia more accurately than the 1994 World Health Organization classification system.

Baak JP, Mutter GL, Robboy S, van Diest PJ, Uyterlinde AM, Orbo A, Palazzo J, Fiane B, Løvslett K, Burger C, Voorhorst F, Verheijen RH.

Cancer. 2005 Jun 1;103(11):2304-12. Review.

5.

Hysteroscopic view in atypical endometrial hyperplasias: A correlation with pathologic findings on hysterectomy specimens.

Garuti G, Mirra M, Luerti M.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006 Jul-Aug;13(4):325-30.

PMID:
16825075
6.

Risk of subsequent endometrial carcinoma associated with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia classification of endometrial biopsies.

Lacey JV Jr, Mutter GL, Nucci MR, Ronnett BM, Ioffe OB, Rush BB, Glass AG, Richesson DA, Chatterjee N, Langholz B, Sherman ME.

Cancer. 2008 Oct 15;113(8):2073-81. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23808.

7.

Comparison of WHO and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia classifications in predicting the presence of coexistent malignancy in endometrial hyperplasia.

Salman MC, Usubutun A, Boynukalin K, Yuce K.

J Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Jun;21(2):97-101. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2010.21.2.97. Epub 2010 Jun 30.

8.

International Internet-based assessment of observer variability for diagnostically challenging endometrial biopsies.

Marotti JD, Glatz K, Parkash V, Hecht JL.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011 Apr;135(4):464-70. doi: 10.1043/2010-0139-OA.1.

PMID:
21466363
9.

Prognostic markers for detection of coexistent carcinoma in high-risk endometrial hyperplasia.

Ørbo A, Moe BT, Arnes M, Pettersen I, Larsen K, Eggen T, Myrmel K, Hanssen K.

Anticancer Res. 2010 Nov;30(11):4649-55.

PMID:
21115919
10.

Reproducibility of current classifications of endometrial endometrioid glandular proliferations: further evidence supporting a simplified classification.

Ordi J, Bergeron C, Hardisson D, McCluggage WG, Hollema H, Felix A, Soslow RA, Oliva E, Tavassoli FA, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Wells M, Nogales FF.

Histopathology. 2014 Jan;64(2):284-92. doi: 10.1111/his.12249. Epub 2013 Sep 20.

PMID:
24111732
11.
12.

Can malignant potential of endometrial polyps be determined by incorporating the endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) classification?

Naaman Y, Diment J, Perlman S, Oustinov N, Vaisbuch E, Ben-Arie A.

Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Feb;136(2):254-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.12.014. Epub 2014 Dec 16.

PMID:
25524459
13.

Frozen section pathology at time of hysterectomy accurately predicts endometrial cancer in patients with preoperative diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia.

Morotti M, Menada MV, Moioli M, Sala P, Maffeo I, Abete L, Fulcheri E, Menoni S, Venturini P, Papadia A.

Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jun;125(3):536-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.02.011. Epub 2012 Feb 21.

PMID:
22361087
14.

Molecular biomarkers in endometrial hyperplasias predict cancer progression.

Steinbakk A, Gudlaugsson E, Aasprong OG, Skaland I, Malpica A, Feng W, Janssen EA, Baak JP.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;204(4):357.e1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.007. Epub 2011 Feb 16.

PMID:
21324435
15.

Concurrent endometrial carcinoma following hysterectomy for atypical endometrial hyperplasia.

Hahn HS, Chun YK, Kwon YI, Kim TJ, Lee KH, Shim JU, Mok JE, Lim KT.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 May;150(1):80-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.002. Epub 2010 Feb 24.

PMID:
20185225
16.

Immunohistochemical expression of PTEN and beta-catenin for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia in Japanese women.

Norimatsu Y, Moriya T, Kobayashi TK, Sakurai T, Shimizu K, Tsukayama C, Ohno E.

Ann Diagn Pathol. 2007 Apr;11(2):103-8.

PMID:
17349568
17.

Papillary proliferation of the endometrium: a clinicopathologic study of 59 cases of simple and complex papillae without cytologic atypia.

Ip PP, Irving JA, McCluggage WG, Clement PB, Young RH.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2013 Feb;37(2):167-77. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318272d428.

PMID:
23211295
18.

Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia terminology in practice: 4-year experience at a single institution.

Kane SE, Hecht JL.

Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2012 Mar;31(2):160-165. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e318227505a.

PMID:
22317874
19.

Prediction of endometrial carcinoma by subjective endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis.

Hecht JL, Ince TA, Baak JP, Baker HE, Ogden MW, Mutter GL.

Mod Pathol. 2005 Mar;18(3):324-30.

20.

The histological diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia. Is there a need to simplify?

Dietel M.

Virchows Arch. 2001 Nov;439(5):604-8. Review.

PMID:
11764378

Supplemental Content

Support Center