Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 616

1.

Comparison of ten-year survivorship of hip prostheses with use of conventional polyethylene, metal-on-metal, or ceramic-on-ceramic bearings.

Milošev I, Kovač S, Trebše R, Levašič V, Pišot V.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Oct 3;94(19):1756-63. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01858.

PMID:
23032586
2.
3.

Do the Reasons for Ceramic-on-ceramic Revisions Differ From Other Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Migaud H, Putman S, Kern G, Isida R, Girard J, Ramdane N, Delaunay CP, Hamadouche M; SoFCOT Study Group.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2190-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4917-x.

4.

Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip Arthroplasty: Is There an Association Between Infection and Bearing Surface Type?

Pitto RP, Sedel L.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2213-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4916-y.

5.

Significantly Lower Wear of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings Than Metal-on-Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Bearings: A 10- to 14-Year Follow-Up Study.

Higuchi Y, Hasegawa Y, Seki T, Komatsu D, Ishiguro N.

J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jun;31(6):1246-50. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.014. Epub 2015 Dec 19.

PMID:
26781388
6.

Are ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty associated with reduced revision risk for late dislocation?

Pitto RP, Garland M, Sedel L.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3790-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4395-6.

7.

A comparative study of four bearing couples of the same acetabular and femoral component: a mean follow-up of 11.5 years.

Topolovec M, Milošev I.

J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jan;29(1):176-80. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.03.030. Epub 2013 Apr 29.

PMID:
23639386
8.

Comparison of the risk of revision in cementless total hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-polyethylene bearings.

Varnum C, Pedersen AB, Kjærsgaard-Andersen P, Overgaard S.

Acta Orthop. 2015;86(4):477-84. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1012975. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

9.

Increased risk of revision of cementless stemmed total hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearings.

Varnum C, Pedersen AB, Mäkelä K, Eskelinen A, Havelin LI, Furnes O, Kärrholm J, Garellick G, Overgaard S.

Acta Orthop. 2015;86(4):491-7. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1023132. Epub 2015 Feb 26.

10.

High rate of revision and a high incidence of radiolucent lines around Metasul metal-on-metal total hip replacements: results from a randomised controlled trial of three bearings after seven years.

Bjorgul K, Novicoff WN, Andersen ST, Ahlund OR, Bunes A, Wiig M, Brevig K.

Bone Joint J. 2013 Jul;95-B(7):881-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B7.31067.

PMID:
23814237
11.

Metal on Metal or Ceramic on Ceramic for Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.

Lee YK, Yoon BH, Choi YS, Jo WL, Ha YC, Koo KH.

J Arthroplasty. 2016 Nov;31(11):2637-2645.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 Apr 27. Review.

PMID:
27215192
12.

Low aseptic loosening and revision rate in Zweymüller-Plus total hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings.

Bouras T, Repantis T, Fennema P, Korovessis P.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Dec;24(8):1439-45.

PMID:
24077918
13.

Ceramic bearings for total hip arthroplasty have high survivorship at 10 years.

D'Antonio JA, Capello WN, Naughton M.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb;470(2):373-81. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2076-7.

14.

Complications Are Not Increased With Acetabular Revision of Metal-on-metal Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Penrose CT, Seyler TM, Wellman SS, Bolognesi MP, Lachiewicz PF.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2134-42. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4793-4.

15.

Do alumina matrix composite bearings decrease hip noises and bearing fractures at a minimum of 5 years after THA?

Baek SH, Kim WK, Kim JY, Kim SY.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3796-802. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4428-1.

16.

No Difference in Reoperations at 2 Years Between Ceramic-on-metal and Metal-on-metal THA: A Randomized Trial.

Engh CA Jr, Sritulanondha S, Korczak A, Whalen TD, Naudie DD, McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):447-55. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4424-5.

17.

Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty With Metasul Bearings Provides Good Results in Active Young Patients: A Concise Followup.

Delaunay CP, Putman S, Puliéro B, Bégin M, Migaud H, Bonnomet F.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2126-33. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4920-2.

18.

Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.

Matharu GS, Pandit HG, Murray DW.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Feb;475(2):304-314. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4882-4.

19.

How have alternative bearings and modularity affected revision rates in total hip arthroplasty?

Mihalko WM, Wimmer MA, Pacione CA, Laurent MP, Murphy RF, Rider C.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec;472(12):3747-58. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3816-2. Review.

20.

Cementless metal-on-metal versus ceramic-on-polyethylene hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years of age: a comparative study with twelve to fourteen-year follow-up.

Migaud H, Putman S, Krantz N, Vasseur L, Girard J.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 May;93 Suppl 2:137-42. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01720.

PMID:
21543703

Supplemental Content

Support Center