Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 107

1.

Detection of antinuclear antibodies by automated indirect immunofluorescence analysis.

Bossuyt X, Cooreman S, De Baere H, Verschueren P, Westhovens R, Blockmans D, Mariën G.

Clin Chim Acta. 2013 Jan 16;415:101-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.09.021. Epub 2012 Sep 28.

PMID:
23026234
2.

Standardization of automated interpretation of immunofluorescence tests.

Roggenbuck D, Hiemann R, Bogdanos D, Reinhold D, Conrad K.

Clin Chim Acta. 2013 Jun 5;421:168-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.03.019. Epub 2013 Mar 26. No abstract available.

PMID:
23537734
3.

Detection of antinuclear antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence and by solid phase assay.

Op De Beeck K, Vermeersch P, Verschueren P, Westhovens R, Mariën G, Blockmans D, Bossuyt X.

Autoimmun Rev. 2011 Oct;10(12):801-8. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2011.06.005. Epub 2011 Jun 30. Review.

PMID:
21741497
4.

Value-added reporting of antinuclear antibody testing by automated indirect immunofluorescence analysis.

Schouwers S, Bonnet M, Verschueren P, Westhovens R, Blockmans D, Mariën G, Bossuyt X.

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014 Apr;52(4):547-51. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2013-0610.

PMID:
24225130
5.

Antinuclear antibody detection by automated multiplex immunoassay in untreated patients at the time of diagnosis.

Op De Beéck K, Vermeersch P, Verschueren P, Westhovens R, Mariën G, Blockmans D, Bossuyt X.

Autoimmun Rev. 2012 Dec;12(2):137-43. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.02.013. Epub 2012 Feb 23. Review.

PMID:
22387973
6.
7.

[The automated analysis of anti-nuclear antibodies using technique of indirect reaction of immunofluorescence with application of HEP-2-cells].

Aleksandrova EN, Verijnikova JG, Novikov AA, Baranov AA, Abaitova NE, Lapkina NA, Roggenbuk D, Nasonov EL.

Klin Lab Diagn. 2015 Mar;60(3):30-5. Russian.

PMID:
26031162
8.

Automated indirect immunofluorescence antinuclear antibody analysis is a standardized alternative for visual microscope interpretation.

Bonroy C, Verfaillie C, Smith V, Persijn L, De Witte E, De Keyser F, Devreese K.

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013 Sep;51(9):1771-9. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2013-0016. Erratum in: Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014 Nov;52(11):1677.

PMID:
23612554
9.

Multiplex assessment of non-organ-specific autoantibodies with a novel microbead-based immunoassay.

Grossmann K, Roggenbuck D, Schröder C, Conrad K, Schierack P, Sack U.

Cytometry A. 2011 Feb;79(2):118-25. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.21009. Epub 2011 Jan 3.

10.

Detection of anti-nuclear antibody by immunofluorescence assay and enzyme immunoassay in childhood systemic lupus erythematosus: experience from Bangladesh.

Dipti TR, Azam MS, Sattar MH, Rahman SA.

Int J Rheum Dis. 2012 Feb;15(1):121-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-185X.2011.01694.x. Epub 2011 Nov 30.

PMID:
22324956
11.

Comparative study of antinuclear antibody detection by indirect immunofluorescence and enzyme immunoassay in lupus patients.

El-Chennawi FA, Mosaad YM, Habib HM, El-Degheidi T.

Immunol Invest. 2009;38(8):839-50. doi: 10.3109/08820130903278097.

PMID:
19860592
12.

Detection of antinuclear antibodies: comparative evaluation of enzyme immunoassay and indirect immunofluorescence methods.

Homburger HA, Cahen YD, Griffiths J, Jacob GL.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998 Nov;122(11):993-9.

PMID:
9822128
13.

Original approach for automated quantification of antinuclear autoantibodies by indirect immunofluorescence.

Bertin D, Jourde-Chiche N, Bongrand P, Bardin N.

Clin Dev Immunol. 2013;2013:182172. doi: 10.1155/2013/182172. Epub 2013 Dec 18.

14.
15.

Measurement of cell-bound complement activation products enhances diagnostic performance in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Kalunian KC, Chatham WW, Massarotti EM, Reyes-Thomas J, Harris C, Furie RA, Chitkara P, Putterman C, Gross RL, Somers EC, Kirou KA, Ramsey-Goldman R, Hsieh C, Buyon JP, Dervieux T, Weinstein A.

Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Dec;64(12):4040-7. doi: 10.1002/art.34669.

16.

Antinuclear antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence : optimum screening dilution for diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Ghosh P, Dwivedi S, Naik S, Agarwal V, Verma A, Aggarwal A, Misra R.

Indian J Med Res. 2007 Jul;126(1):34-8.

PMID:
17890821
17.

[The optimization of techniques complex of serologic diagnostics of connective tissue systemic diseases].

Lazareva NM, Lapin SV, Mazing AV, Bulgakova TV, Ilivanova EP, Maslianskiĭ AL, Totolian AA.

Klin Lab Diagn. 2011 Dec;(12):12-7. Russian.

PMID:
22416425
18.

Are anti-nucleosome antibodies a better diagnostic marker than anti-dsDNA antibodies for systemic lupus erythematosus? A systematic review and a study of metanalysis.

Bizzaro N, Villalta D, Giavarina D, Tozzoli R.

Autoimmun Rev. 2012 Dec;12(2):97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Jul 15. Review.

PMID:
22810055
19.

[Clinical utility of serum diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases].

Mindlin A.

Rev Med Brux. 2007 Sep;28(4):302-7. French.

PMID:
17958025
20.

Cost-effective detection of non-antidouble-stranded DNA antinuclear antibody specificities in daily clinical practice.

Vos PA, Bast EJ, Derksen RH.

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006 May;45(5):629-35. Epub 2005 Dec 20.

PMID:
16368728

Supplemental Content

Support Center