Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 82

1.

A framework for best evidence approaches can improve the transparency of systematic reviews.

Treadwell JR, Singh S, Talati R, McPheeters ML, Reston JT.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Nov;65(11):1159-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.06.001.

PMID:
23017634
2.

Assessing "best evidence": issues in grading the quality of studies for systematic reviews.

Lohr KN, Carey TS.

Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1999 Sep;25(9):470-9. Review.

PMID:
10481816
3.

Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.

Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.

PMID:
18987905
6.

Observational studies in systematic [corrected] reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.

Norris SL, Atkins D, Bruening W, Fox S, Johnson E, Kane R, Morton SC, Oremus M, Ospina M, Randhawa G, Schoelles K, Shekelle P, Viswanathan M.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1178-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.027. Epub 2011 Jun 1. Erratum in: J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Oct;66(10):1194.

PMID:
21636246
7.

A Framework for "Best Evidence" Approaches in Systematic Reviews [Internet].

Treadwell JR, Singh S, Talati R, McPheeters ML, Reston JT.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2011 Jun.

8.

[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25. German.

PMID:
19034813
9.

Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.

Kranke P.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Sep;27(9):763-72. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833a560a.

PMID:
20523217
10.

[Systematic reviews and metaanalyses. Basic knowledge, strengths and weaknesses of an important tool for healthcare professionals].

Schnabel A, Kranke P.

Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2010 Jul;45(7-8):510-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262480. Epub 2010 Jul 21. Review. German.

PMID:
20665362
12.
13.

Systematic reviews for evidence-based management: how to find them and what to do with them.

Chan KS, Morton SC, Shekelle PG.

Am J Manag Care. 2004 Nov;10(11 Pt 1):806-12.

14.

Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.

Atkins D, Chang SM, Gartlehner G, Buckley DI, Whitlock EP, Berliner E, Matchar D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1198-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.021. Epub 2011 Apr 3.

PMID:
21463926
15.

Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.

Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacoot N, Glanville J.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. Review.

16.

Evidence-based pediatric pulmonary medicine: how can it help?

Smyth RL.

Pediatr Pulmonol. 1998 Feb;25(2):118-27. Review.

PMID:
9516096
17.

Assessing equivalence and noninferiority.

Treadwell JR, Uhl S, Tipton K, Shamliyan T, Viswanathan M, Berkman ND, Sun X, Coleman CI, Elshaug AG, Singh S, Wang SY, Ramakrishnan R.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Nov;65(11):1144-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 Jun 23.

PMID:
22732455
18.

Evidence-based medicine.

Smyth RL.

Paediatr Respir Rev. 2000 Sep;1(3):287-93. Review.

PMID:
12531092
19.

Methodology for the systematic reviews on an evidence-based approach for the management of chronic low back pain.

Norvell DC, Dettori JR, Fehlings MG, Fourney DR, Chapman JR.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S10-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef8ee. Review.

PMID:
21952182
20.

Challenges in systematic reviews of therapeutic devices and procedures.

Hartling L, McAlister FA, Rowe BH, Ezekowitz J, Friesen C, Klassen TP.

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1100-11. Review.

PMID:
15968035

Supplemental Content

Support Center