Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 107

1.

Selection dynamics in joint matching to rate and magnitude of reinforcement.

McDowell JJ, Popa A, Calvin NT.

J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Sep;98(2):199-212.

2.

A computational theory of selection by consequences applied to concurrent schedules.

McDowell JJ, Caron ML, Kulubekova S, Berg JP.

J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Nov;90(3):387-403.

3.

Undermatching is an emergent property of selection by consequences.

McDowell JJ, Caron ML.

Behav Processes. 2007 Jun;75(2):97-106. Epub 2007 Mar 1.

PMID:
17399915
4.

Toward a mechanics of adaptive behavior: evolutionary dynamics and matching theory statics.

McDowell JJ, Popa A.

J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Sep;94(2):241-60. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-241.

5.

Computational model of selection by consequences: patterns of preference change on concurrent schedules.

Kulubekova S, McDowell JJ.

J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Sep;100(2):147-64. doi: 10.1002/jeab.40. Epub 2013 Jul 29.

PMID:
23897587
6.

Testing the linearity and independence assumptions of the generalized matching law for reinforcer magnitude: a residual meta-analysis.

Cording JR, McLean AP, Grace RC.

Behav Processes. 2011 May;87(1):64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.02.011. Epub 2011 Mar 17.

PMID:
21419833
7.

Against matching theory: predictions of an evolutionary theory of behavior dynamics.

McDowell JJ, Calvin NT.

Behav Processes. 2015 May;114:14-25. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.02.007. Epub 2015 Feb 11.

PMID:
25680328
8.

Concurrent reinforcement schedules for problem behavior and appropriate behavior: experimental applications of the matching law.

Borrero CS, Vollmer TR, Borrero JC, Bourret JC, Sloman KN, Samaha AL, Dallery J.

J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 May;93(3):455-69. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-455.

9.

Barycentric extension of generalized matching.

Jensen G, Neuringer A.

J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Sep;92(2):139-59. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.92-139.

11.

The matching law and effects of reinforcer rate and magnitude on choice in transition.

Kyonka EG.

Behav Processes. 2008 Jun;78(2):210-6. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.12.003. Epub 2007 Dec 15.

PMID:
18243576
12.

The identities hidden in the matching laws, and their uses.

Thorne DR.

J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Mar;93(2):247-60. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-247.

13.

Extending unified-theory-of-reinforcement neural networks to steady-state operant behavior.

Calvin OL, McDowell JJ.

Behav Processes. 2016 Jun;127:52-61. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.03.016. Epub 2016 Mar 24. Review.

PMID:
27018201
14.

Human choice under schedules of negative reinforcement.

Alessandri J, Cançado CR.

Behav Processes. 2015 Dec;121:70-3. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.10.015. Epub 2015 Oct 27.

PMID:
26518610
15.

Human choice in concurrent ratio-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Savastano HI, Fantino E.

J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 May;61(3):453-63.

16.

The logistics of choice.

Killeen PR.

J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Jul;104(1):74-92. doi: 10.1002/jeab.156. Epub 2015 May 18.

PMID:
25988932
17.

Matching and conditioned reinforcement rate.

Shahan TA, Podlesnik CA, Jimenez-Gomez C.

J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Mar;85(2):167-80.

18.

Contingency discriminability and the generalized matching law describe choice on concurrent ratio schedules of wheel-running reinforcement.

Belke TW.

Behav Processes. 2012 Jul;90(3):291-301. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Mar 10.

PMID:
22414348
19.

Law of effect models and choice between many alternatives.

Navakatikyan MA, Murrell P, Bensemann J, Davison M, Elliffe D.

J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Sep;100(2):222-56. doi: 10.1002/jeab.37. Epub 2013 Jul 29.

PMID:
23897518
20.

A test of the formal and modern theories of matching.

Dallery J, Soto PL, McDowell JJ.

J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Sep;84(2):129-45.

Supplemental Content

Support Center