Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 215

1.

Comparison of 3D computer-aided with manual cerebral aneurysm measurements in different imaging modalities.

Groth M, Forkert ND, Buhk JH, Schoenfeld M, Goebell E, Fiehler J.

Neuroradiology. 2013 Feb;55(2):171-8. doi: 10.1007/s00234-012-1095-8. Epub 2012 Sep 25.

PMID:
23007858
2.

Comparison of 3D TOF-MRA and 3D CE-MRA at 3T for imaging of intracranial aneurysms.

Cirillo M, Scomazzoni F, Cirillo L, Cadioli M, Simionato F, Iadanza A, Kirchin M, Righi C, Anzalone N.

Eur J Radiol. 2013 Dec;82(12):e853-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.08.052. Epub 2013 Sep 12.

PMID:
24103356
3.

Follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms at 3T: comparison of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Cirillo M, Righi C, Simionato F, Cadioli M, Iadanza A, Kirchin MA, Scotti G.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Sep;29(8):1530-6. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1166. Epub 2008 Jun 12.

4.
5.

Comparison of remnant size in embolized intracranial aneurysms measured at follow-up with DSA and MRA.

Serafin Z, Strześniewski P, Lasek W, Beuth W.

Neuroradiology. 2012 Dec;54(12):1381-8. doi: 10.1007/s00234-012-1063-3. Epub 2012 Jul 13.

6.

Evaluation of intracranial aneurysms with 7 T versus 1.5 T time-of-flight MR angiography - initial experience.

Mönninghoff C, Maderwald S, Theysohn JM, Kraff O, Ladd SC, Ladd ME, Forsting M, Quick HH, Wanke I.

Rofo. 2009 Jan;181(1):16-23. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1027863. Epub 2008 Dec 29.

PMID:
19115164
7.
8.

Three-dimensional time-of-flight (3D TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and contrast-enhanced MRA of intracranial aneurysms treated with platinum coils.

Wikström J, Ronne-Engström E, Gal G, Enblad P, Tovi M.

Acta Radiol. 2008 Mar;49(2):190-6. doi: 10.1080/02841850701732940. Erratum in: Acta Radiol. 2009 Apr;50(3):349.

PMID:
18300146
9.

Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms selectively treated with coils: Prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

Pierot L, Delcourt C, Bouquigny F, Breidt D, Feuillet B, Lanoix O, Gallas S.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Apr;27(4):744-9.

10.

Diagnostic accuracy of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography for follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: influence of aneurysm size.

Deutschmann HA, Augustin M, Simbrunner J, Unger B, Schoellnast H, Fritz GA, Klein GE.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Apr;28(4):628-34.

11.

Follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: comparison of 3D time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3T in a large, prospective series.

Pierot L, Portefaix C, Boulin A, Gauvrit JY.

Eur Radiol. 2012 Oct;22(10):2255-63. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2466-6. Epub 2012 May 9. Erratum in: Eur Radiol. 2012 Oct;22(10):2282.

PMID:
22569997
12.

Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with stent-assisted coiling: Comparison of contrast-enhanced MRA, time-of-flight MRA, and digital subtraction angiography.

Marciano D, Soize S, Metaxas G, Portefaix C, Pierot L.

J Neuroradiol. 2017 Feb;44(1):44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Nov 9.

PMID:
27836654
13.

CT angiography with three-dimensional techniques for the early diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms. Comparison with intra-arterial DSA and the surgical findings.

Karamessini MT, Kagadis GC, Petsas T, Karnabatidis D, Konstantinou D, Sakellaropoulos GC, Nikiforidis GC, Siablis D.

Eur J Radiol. 2004 Mar;49(3):212-23.

PMID:
14962650
14.

Identification of the inflow zone of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: comparison of 4D flow MRI and 3D TOF MRA data.

Futami K, Sano H, Misaki K, Nakada M, Ueda F, Hamada J.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Jul;35(7):1363-70. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3877. Epub 2014 Mar 7.

15.

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of intracranial giant aneurysms.

Jäger HR, Ellamushi H, Moore EA, Grieve JP, Kitchen ND, Taylor WJ.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000 Nov-Dec;21(10):1900-7.

17.

Evaluation of the occlusion status of coiled intracranial aneurysms with MR angiography at 3T: is contrast enhancement necessary?

Sprengers ME, Schaafsma JD, van Rooij WJ, van den Berg R, Rinkel GJ, Akkerman EM, Ferns SP, Majoie CB.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Oct;30(9):1665-71. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1678. Epub 2009 Jul 23.

18.
19.

Time-of-flight MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the imaging follow-up of 51 intracranial aneurysms treated with coils.

Ferré JC, Carsin-Nicol B, Morandi X, Carsin M, de Kersaint-Gilly A, Gauvrit JY, Desal HA.

Eur J Radiol. 2009 Dec;72(3):365-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.08.005. Epub 2008 Sep 21.

PMID:
18809272
20.

Accuracy of semiautomated analysis of 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for detection and quantification of aortoiliac stenoses.

de Vries M, de Koning PJ, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Nelemans PJ, Nijenhuis RJ, Planken RN, Vasbinder GB, van Engelshoven JM, van der Geest RJ, Leiner T.

Invest Radiol. 2005 Aug;40(8):495-503.

PMID:
16024987

Supplemental Content

Support Center