Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 188

1.

Comparability and repeatability of corneal astigmatism measurements using different measurement technologies.

Visser N, Berendschot TT, Verbakel F, de Brabander J, Nuijts RM.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Oct;38(10):1764-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.05.036.

PMID:
22999600
2.

Comparison of corneal powers obtained from 4 different devices.

Shirayama M, Wang L, Weikert MP, Koch DD.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Oct;148(4):528-535.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.04.028. Epub 2009 Jul 9.

PMID:
19541287
3.

Univariate and bivariate polar value analysis of corneal astigmatism measurements obtained with 6 instruments.

Lee H, Chung JL, Kim EK, Sgrignoli B, Kim TI.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Sep;38(9):1608-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.04.035. Epub 2012 Jul 15.

PMID:
22795977
4.

Assessment of corneal curvature using verion optical imaging system: a comparative study.

Lauschke JL, Lawless M, Sutton G, Roberts TV, Hodge C.

Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul;44(5):369-76. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12687. Epub 2016 Feb 20.

PMID:
27381574
5.

Dual versus single Scheimpflug camera for anterior segment analysis: Precision and agreement.

Aramberri J, Araiz L, Garcia A, Illarramendi I, Olmos J, Oyanarte I, Romay A, Vigara I.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Nov;38(11):1934-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.06.049. Epub 2012 Sep 18.

PMID:
22995705
6.

Keratometry evaluations with the Pentacam high resolution in comparison with the automated keratometry and conventional corneal topography.

Módis L Jr, Szalai E, Kolozsvári B, Németh G, Vajas A, Berta A.

Cornea. 2012 Jan;31(1):36-41. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318204c666.

PMID:
22081146
7.

Comparison of corneal astigmatism and axis location in cataract patients measured by total corneal power, automated keratometry, and simulated keratometry.

Srivannaboon S, Soeharnila, Chirapapaisan C, Chonpimai P.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Dec;38(12):2088-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.07.024. Epub 2012 Sep 15.

PMID:
22985831
8.

Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of curvature and aberrometric measurements of the posterior corneal surface in normal eyes using Scheimpflug photography.

Piñero DP, Saenz González C, Alió JL.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Jan;35(1):113-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.10.010.

PMID:
19101433
9.

Precision (Repeatability and Reproducibility) and Agreement of Corneal Power Measurements Obtained by Topcon KR-1W and iTrace.

Hua Y, Xu Z, Qiu W, Wu Q.

PLoS One. 2016 Jan 11;11(1):e0147086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147086. eCollection 2016.

10.

Differences in corneal astigmatism between partial coherence interferometry biometry and automated keratometry and relation to topographic pattern.

Park JH, Kang SY, Kim HM, Song JS.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Sep;37(9):1694-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.03.047.

PMID:
21855766
11.

Automated keratometry in routine cataract surgery: comparison of Scheimpflug and conventional values.

Symes RJ, Ursell PG.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Feb;37(2):295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.050.

PMID:
21241912
12.

Comparison of refractive outcomes using five devices for the assessment of preoperative corneal power.

Whang WJ, Byun YS, Joo CK.

Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Jul;40(5):425-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02777.x.

PMID:
22394318
13.

Comparison of keratometric data obtained by automated keratometer, Dicon CT 200, Allegro Topolyzer, and Pentacam.

Gonen T, Cosar CB, Sener B, Keskinbora KH.

J Refract Surg. 2012 Aug;28(8):557-61. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20120723-04.

PMID:
22869234
14.

Precision and agreement of corneal power measurements obtained using a new corneal topographer OphthaTOP.

Huang J, Savini G, Chen H, Bao F, Li Y, Chen H, Lu W, Yu Y, Wang Q.

PLoS One. 2015 Jan 5;10(1):e109414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109414. eCollection 2015.

15.

Repeatability and agreement of Scheimpflug-based and swept-source optical biometry measurements.

Sel S, Stange J, Kaiser D, Kiraly L.

Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017 Oct;40(5):318-322. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 23.

PMID:
28342729
16.

Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of corneal power measurements obtained with a new corneal topographer.

Mao X, Savini G, Zhuo Z, Feng Y, Zhang J, Wang Q, Chen H, Huang J.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Oct;39(10):1561-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.04.029. Epub 2013 Jul 13.

PMID:
23860010
17.

Repeatability and inter-device agreement for three different methods of keratometry: Placido, Scheimpflug, and color LED corneal topography.

Hidalgo IR, Rozema JJ, Dhubhghaill SN, Zakaria N, Koppen C, Tassignon MJ.

J Refract Surg. 2015 Mar;31(3):176-81. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20150224-01.

PMID:
25751834
18.

Predicting postoperative astigmatism using Scheimpflug keratometry (Pentacam) and automated keratometry (IOLMaster).

Yong Park C, Do JR, Chuck RS.

Curr Eye Res. 2012 Dec;37(12):1091-8. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2012.713158. Epub 2012 Aug 23.

PMID:
22916682
19.

Simulated Keratometry Repeatability in Subjects with and without Down Syndrome.

Ravikumar A, Marsack JD, Benoit JS, Anderson HA.

Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Nov;93(11):1356-1363.

20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center