Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 136

1.

Testing the risk of bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs.

Hartling L, Hamm MP, Milne A, Vandermeer B, Santaguida PL, Ansari M, Tsertsvadze A, Hempel S, Shekelle P, Dryden DM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;66(9):973-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.07.005. Epub 2012 Sep 13.

PMID:
22981249
2.

Validity and Inter-Rater Reliability Testing of Quality Assessment Instruments [Internet].

Hartling L, Hamm M, Milne A, Vandermeer B, Santaguida PL, Ansari M, Tsertsvadze A, Hempel S, Shekelle P, Dryden DM.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Mar.

3.

Poor reliability between Cochrane reviewers and blinded external reviewers when applying the Cochrane risk of bias tool in physical therapy trials.

Armijo-Olivo S, Ospina M, da Costa BR, Egger M, Saltaji H, Fuentes J, Ha C, Cummings GG.

PLoS One. 2014 May 13;9(5):e96920. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096920. eCollection 2014.

4.

Reliability of 3 assessment tools used to evaluate randomized controlled trials for treatment of neck pain.

Graham N, Haines T, Goldsmith CH, Gross A, Burnie S, Shahzad U, Talovikova E.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Mar 15;37(6):515-22. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822671eb.

PMID:
21673624
5.

Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study.

Hartling L, Ospina M, Liang Y, Dryden DM, Hooton N, Krebs Seida J, Klassen TP.

BMJ. 2009 Oct 19;339:b4012. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4012.

6.
7.

Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement.

Hoy D, Brooks P, Woolf A, Blyth F, March L, Bain C, Baker P, Smith E, Buchbinder R.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Sep;65(9):934-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.014. Epub 2012 Jun 27.

PMID:
22742910
8.

Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale showed low reliability between individual reviewers.

Hartling L, Milne A, Hamm MP, Vandermeer B, Ansari M, Tsertsvadze A, Dryden DM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;66(9):982-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 May 16.

PMID:
23683848
9.

Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews of Non-Randomized Studies of Adverse Cardiovascular Effects of Thiazolidinediones and Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: Application of a New Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.

Bilandzic A, Fitzpatrick T, Rosella L, Henry D.

PLoS Med. 2016 Apr 5;13(4):e1001987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001987. eCollection 2016 Apr.

10.

Practicalities of using a modified version of the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool for randomised and non-randomised study designs applied in a health technology assessment setting.

Robertson C, Ramsay C, Gurung T, Mowatt G, Pickard R, Sharma P; UK Robotic Laparoscopic Prostatectomy HTA Study Group.

Res Synth Methods. 2014 Sep;5(3):200-11. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1102. Epub 2013 Nov 14.

PMID:
26052846
11.

A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials.

Bialy L, Vandermeer B, Lacaze-Masmonteil T, Dryden DM, Hartling L.

Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Dec;9(4):1052-9. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1985.

PMID:
25504975
12.

Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity.

Kim SY, Park JE, Lee YJ, Seo HJ, Sheen SS, Hahn S, Jang BH, Son HJ.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Apr;66(4):408-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.016. Epub 2013 Jan 18.

PMID:
23337781
13.

Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a study protocol.

da Costa BR, Resta NM, Beckett B, Israel-Stahre N, Diaz A, Johnston BC, Egger M, Jüni P, Armijo-Olivo S.

Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 13;3:144. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-144. Review.

14.

Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research.

Armijo-Olivo S, Stiles CR, Hagen NA, Biondo PD, Cummings GG.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Feb;18(1):12-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01516.x. Epub 2010 Aug 4.

PMID:
20698919
15.

Interrater reliability of grading strength of evidence varies with the complexity of the evidence in systematic reviews.

Berkman ND, Lohr KN, Morgan LC, Kuo TM, Morton SC.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Oct;66(10):1105-1117.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.06.002.

PMID:
23993312
16.

Interrater reliability in assessing quality of diagnostic accuracy studies using the QUADAS tool. A preliminary assessment.

Hollingworth W, Medina LS, Lenkinski RE, Shibata DK, Bernal B, Zurakowski D, Comstock B, Jarvik JG.

Acad Radiol. 2006 Jul;13(7):803-10.

PMID:
16777553
17.

A new risk of bias checklist applicable to randomized trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews was developed and validated to be used for systematic reviews focusing on drug adverse events.

Faillie JL, Ferrer P, Gouverneur A, Driot D, Berkemeyer S, Vidal X, Martínez-Zapata MJ, Huerta C, Castells X, Rottenkolber M, Schmiedl S, Sabaté M, Ballarín E, Ibáñez L.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Jun;86:168-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.023. Epub 2017 May 6.

PMID:
28487158
18.

Risk of bias tool in systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture in Chinese journals.

Liu Y, Yang S, Dai J, Xu Y, Zhang R, Jiang H, Yan X, Yang K.

PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028130. Epub 2011 Dec 9.

19.

From the trenches: a cross-sectional study applying the GRADE tool in systematic reviews of healthcare interventions.

Hartling L, Fernandes RM, Seida J, Vandermeer B, Dryden DM.

PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034697. Epub 2012 Apr 5.

20.

Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records.

Edwards P, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Roberts I, Wentz R.

Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1635-40.

PMID:
12111924

Supplemental Content

Support Center