Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 171

1.

Data quality at the Icelandic Cancer Registry: comparability, validity, timeliness and completeness.

Sigurdardottir LG, Jonasson JG, Stefansdottir S, Jonsdottir A, Olafsdottir GH, Olafsdottir EJ, Tryggvadottir L.

Acta Oncol. 2012 Sep;51(7):880-9. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.698751.

PMID:
22974093
2.

Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness.

Bray F, Parkin DM.

Eur J Cancer. 2009 Mar;45(5):747-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.032. Epub 2008 Dec 29. Review.

PMID:
19117750
3.

Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods Part II. Completeness.

Parkin DM, Bray F.

Eur J Cancer. 2009 Mar;45(5):756-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.033. Epub 2009 Jan 6. Review.

PMID:
19128954
4.

Data quality at the Cancer Registry of Norway: an overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness.

Larsen IK, Småstuen M, Johannesen TB, Langmark F, Parkin DM, Bray F, Møller B.

Eur J Cancer. 2009 May;45(7):1218-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.037. Epub 2008 Dec 16.

PMID:
19091545
5.

Data quality at the Bulgarian National Cancer Registry: An overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness.

Dimitrova N, Parkin DM.

Cancer Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;39(3):405-13. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.03.015. Epub 2015 Apr 22.

PMID:
25914137
6.
7.

Data quality at the Singapore Cancer Registry: An overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness.

Fung JW, Lim SB, Zheng H, Ho WY, Lee BG, Chow KY, Lee HP.

Cancer Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;43:76-86. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jul 9. Review.

PMID:
27399312
8.

Completeness and timeliness: Cancer registries could/should improve their performance.

Zanetti R, Schmidtmann I, Sacchetto L, Binder-Foucard F, Bordoni A, Coza D, Ferretti S, Galceran J, Gavin A, Larranaga N, Robinson D, Tryggvadottir L, Van Eycken E, Zadnik V, Coebergh JW, Rosso S.

Eur J Cancer. 2015 Jun;51(9):1091-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.11.040. Epub 2014 Jan 3.

PMID:
24393522
9.

Completeness in an African cancer registry.

Parkin DM, Wabinga H, Nambooze S.

Cancer Causes Control. 2001 Feb;12(2):147-52.

PMID:
11246843
10.

[Relation of breast cancer tumour stage and the degree of registration in a population-based cancer registry].

Katalinic A, Holzmann M, Kunze U.

Gesundheitswesen. 2003 Aug-Sep;65(8-9):509-15. German.

PMID:
14505270
11.

Data quality at population-based cancer registries in Colombia.

Cendales R, Pardo C, Uribe C, López G, Yepez MC, Bravo LE.

Biomedica. 2012 Oct-Dec;32(4):536-44. doi: 10.1590/S0120-41572012000400009.

12.

The data quality of haematological malignancy ICD-10 diagnoses in a population-based hospital discharge registry.

Nørgaard M, Skriver MV, Gregersen H, Pedersen G, Schønheyder HC, Sørensen HT.

Eur J Cancer Prev. 2005 Jun;14(3):201-6.

PMID:
15901987
13.

[The importance of the common cancer registry for the identification of cancer cases in the EPIC Potsdam-study -- results of the first record linkage].

Bergmann MM, Noethlings U, Eisinger B, Streller B, Quehl A, Walter D, Lahmann PH, Boeing H.

Gesundheitswesen. 2004 Aug-Sep;66(8-9):475-81. German.

PMID:
15372347
14.

Quality assessment of the registration of vulvar and vaginal premalignant lesions at the Cancer Registry of Norway.

Enerly E, Bray F, Mellem C, Hansen BT, Kjølberg G, Dahl T, Johannesen TB, Nygård M.

Acta Oncol. 2012 Jan;51(1):45-50. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2011.624545. Epub 2011 Nov 2.

15.

Quality, comparability and methods of analysis of data on childhood cancer in Europe (1978-1997): report from the Automated Childhood Cancer Information System project.

Steliarova-Foucher E, Kaatsch P, Lacour B, Pompe-Kirn V, Eser S, Miranda A, Danzon A, Ratiu A, Parkin DM.

Eur J Cancer. 2006 Sep;42(13):1915-51. Review.

PMID:
16919762
16.

Comparability of colorectal cancer survival data in three European population-based registries.

Monnet E, Faivre J, Raymond L, Garau I.

Eur J Cancer Prev. 1998 Apr;7(2):127-34.

PMID:
9818774
17.

Trends in the survival of patients diagnosed with cancer in the Nordic countries 1964-2003 followed up to the end of 2006. Material and methods.

Engholm G, Gislum M, Bray F, Hakulinen T.

Acta Oncol. 2010 Jun;49(5):545-60. doi: 10.3109/02841861003739322.

PMID:
20491523
18.

Quality evaluation of national cancer registry system in Iran: study protocol.

Modirian M, Rahimzadeh S, Cheraghi Z, Khosravi A, Salimzadeh H, Kompani F, Rezaei N, Qorbani M, Delavari A, Moradi-Lakeh M, Farzadfar F.

Arch Iran Med. 2014 Mar;17(3):193-7. doi: 0141703/AIM.0010.

20.

Completeness of information on adjuvant therapies for colorectal cancer in population-based cancer registries.

Cress RD, Zaslavsky AM, West DW, Wolf RE, Felter MC, Ayanian JZ.

Med Care. 2003 Sep;41(9):1006-12. Erratum in: Med Care. 2005 Apr;43(4):423.

PMID:
12972840

Supplemental Content

Support Center