Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 153

1.

Publication bias in laboratory animal research: a survey on magnitude, drivers, consequences and potential solutions.

ter Riet G, Korevaar DA, Leenaars M, Sterk PJ, Van Noorden CJ, Bouter LM, Lutter R, Elferink RP, Hooft L.

PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e43404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043404.

2.

Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.

Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder J, Sutton AJ, Hing C, Kwok CS, Pang C, Harvey I.

Health Technol Assess. 2010 Feb;14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. doi: 10.3310/hta14080. Review.

3.

Factors influencing the publication of randomized controlled trials in child health research.

Hartling L, Craig WR, Russell K, Stevens K, Klassen TP.

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004 Oct;158(10):983-7.

PMID:
15466687
4.

Publication bias in papers presented to the Australian Orthopaedic Association Annual Scientific Meeting.

Harris IA, Mourad MS, Kadir A, Solomon MJ, Young JM.

ANZ J Surg. 2006 Jun;76(6):427-31.

PMID:
16768761
5.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of preclinical studies: publication bias in laboratory animal experiments.

Korevaar DA, Hooft L, ter Riet G.

Lab Anim. 2011 Oct;45(4):225-30. doi: 10.1258/la.2011.010121.

PMID:
21737463
6.

Review articles and publication bias.

Kleijnen J, Knipschild P.

Arzneimittelforschung. 1992 May;42(5):587-91.

PMID:
1388359
7.

Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature.

De Oliveira GS Jr, Chang R, Kendall MC, Fitzgerald PC, McCarthy RJ.

Anesth Analg. 2012 May;114(5):1042-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182468fc6.

PMID:
22344237
8.

Is there a solution to publication bias? Researchers call for changes in dissemination of clinical research results.

Malički M, Marušić A; OPEN (to Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) Consortium..

J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Oct;67(10):1103-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.002.

PMID:
25034197
9.

Using the Internet for surveys and health research.

Eysenbach G, Wyatt J.

J Med Internet Res. 2002 Apr-Nov;4(2):E13. Review.

10.

Publication bias in ecology and evolution: an empirical assessment using the 'trim and fill' method.

Jennions MD, Møller AP.

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2002 May;77(2):211-22. Review.

PMID:
12056747
11.

Should IACUCs review scientific merit of animal research projects?

Mann MD, Prentice ED.

Lab Anim (NY). 2004 Jan;33(1):26-31. Review.

PMID:
14752528
13.

Analysis of trends in the full publication of papers from conference abstracts involving pre-harvest or abattoir-level interventions against foodborne pathogens.

Snedeker KG, Totton SC, Sargeant JM.

Prev Vet Med. 2010 Jun 1;95(1-2):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.02.015.

PMID:
20338648
14.

The relationship between study design, results, and reporting of randomized clinical trials of HIV infection.

Ioannidis JP, Cappelleri JC, Sacks HS, Lau J.

Control Clin Trials. 1997 Oct;18(5):431-44.

PMID:
9315426
15.

An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist.

Tricco AC, Pham B, Brehaut J, Tetroe J, Cappelli M, Hopewell S, Lavis JN, Berlin JA, Moher D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Jun;62(6):617-623.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.09.014.

PMID:
19162440
16.

The publication process itself was the major cause of publication bias in genetic epidemiology.

Calnan M, Smith GD, Sterne JA.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Dec;59(12):1312-8.

PMID:
17098574
17.

Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review.

McGauran N, Wieseler B, Kreis J, Schüler YB, Kölsch H, Kaiser T.

Trials. 2010 Apr 13;11:37. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-37. Review.

18.

Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy.

Turner EH, Matthews AM, Linardatos E, Tell RA, Rosenthal R.

N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 17;358(3):252-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa065779.

20.
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center