Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 103

1.

Sampling strategy and potential utility of indels for DNA barcoding of closely related plant species: a case study in taxus.

Liu J, Provan J, Gao LM, Li DZ.

Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(7):8740-51. doi: 10.3390/ijms13078740. Epub 2012 Jul 13.

2.

DNA barcoding for the discrimination of Eurasian yews (Taxus L., Taxaceae) and the discovery of cryptic species.

Liu J, Möller M, Gao LM, Zhang DQ, Li DZ.

Mol Ecol Resour. 2011 Jan;11(1):89-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02907.x. Epub 2010 Aug 16.

PMID:
21429104
3.

A tiered barcode authentication tool to differentiate medicinal Cassia species in India.

Purushothaman N, Newmaster SG, Ragupathy S, Stalin N, Suresh D, Arunraj DR, Gnanasekaran G, Vassou SL, Narasimhan D, Parani M.

Genet Mol Res. 2014 Apr 16;13(2):2959-68. doi: 10.4238/2014.April.16.4.

4.

Utility of indels for species-level identification of a biologically complex plant group: a study with intergenic spacer in Citrus.

Mahadani P, Ghosh SK.

Mol Biol Rep. 2014 Nov;41(11):7217-22. doi: 10.1007/s11033-014-3606-7. Epub 2014 Jul 22.

PMID:
25048292
5.

Barcoding success as a function of phylogenetic relatedness in Viburnum, a clade of woody angiosperms.

Clement WL, Donoghue MJ.

BMC Evol Biol. 2012 May 30;12:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-73.

6.

Deciduous trees and the application of universal DNA barcodes: a case study on the circumpolar Fraxinus.

Arca M, Hinsinger DD, Cruaud C, Tillier A, Bousquet J, Frascaria-Lacoste N.

PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e34089. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034089. Epub 2012 Mar 27.

7.

Organization of chloroplast psbA-trnH intergenic spacer in dicotyledonous angiosperms of the family Umbelliferae.

Degtjareva GV, Logacheva MD, Samigullin TH, Terentieva EI, Valiejo-Roman CM.

Biochemistry (Mosc). 2012 Sep;77(9):1056-64. doi: 10.1134/S0006297912090131.

PMID:
23157266
8.

[DNA barcoding the medicinal plants of the genus Paris].

Zhu YJ, Chen SL, Yao H, Tan R, Song JY, Luo K, Lu J.

Yao Xue Xue Bao. 2010 Mar;45(3):376-82. Chinese.

PMID:
21351516
9.

Highly variable chloroplast markers for evaluating plant phylogeny at low taxonomic levels and for DNA barcoding.

Dong W, Liu J, Yu J, Wang L, Zhou S.

PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035071. Epub 2012 Apr 12.

10.

Forensic botany II, DNA barcode for land plants: Which markers after the international agreement?

Ferri G, Corradini B, Ferrari F, Santunione AL, Palazzoli F, Alu' M.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 Mar;15:131-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Oct 16.

PMID:
25457632
11.

Patterns and relative rates of nucleotide and insertion/deletion evolution at six chloroplast intergenic regions in new world species of the Lecythidaceae.

Hamilton MB, Braverman JM, Soria-Hernanz DF.

Mol Biol Evol. 2003 Oct;20(10):1710-21. Epub 2003 Jun 27.

PMID:
12832633
12.

Identification of species in the angiosperm family Apiaceae using DNA barcodes.

Liu J, Shi L, Han J, Li G, Lu H, Hou J, Zhou X, Meng F, Downie SR.

Mol Ecol Resour. 2014 Nov;14(6):1231-8. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12262. Epub 2014 May 14.

PMID:
24739357
13.

Testing DNA barcodes in closely related species of Curcuma (Zingiberaceae) from Myanmar and China.

Chen J, Zhao J, Erickson DL, Xia N, Kress WJ.

Mol Ecol Resour. 2015 Mar;15(2):337-48. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12319. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

PMID:
25158042
14.

Potential use of DNA barcoding for the identification of Salvia based on cpDNA and nrDNA sequences.

Wang M, Zhao HX, Wang L, Wang T, Yang RW, Wang XL, Zhou YH, Ding CB, Zhang L.

Gene. 2013 Oct 10;528(2):206-15. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Jul 16.

PMID:
23867856
15.

[Screening potential DNA barcode regions of genus Papaver].

Zhang S, Liu YJ, Wu YS, Cao Y, Yuan Y.

Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2015 Aug;40(15):2964-9. Chinese.

PMID:
26677693
16.

DNA barcoding of the Lemnaceae, a family of aquatic monocots.

Wang W, Wu Y, Yan Y, Ermakova M, Kerstetter R, Messing J.

BMC Plant Biol. 2010 Sep 16;10:205. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-205.

17.

Evaluation of 11 single-locus and seven multilocus DNA barcodes in Lamium L. (Lamiaceae).

Krawczyk K, Szczecińska M, Sawicki J.

Mol Ecol Resour. 2014 Mar;14(2):272-85. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12175. Epub 2013 Oct 25.

PMID:
24118979
18.

DNA barcoding in native plants of the Labiatae (Lamiaceae) family from Chios Island (Greece) and the adjacent Çeşme-Karaburun Peninsula (Turkey).

Theodoridis S, Stefanaki A, Tezcan M, Aki C, Kokkini S, Vlachonasios KE.

Mol Ecol Resour. 2012 Jul;12(4):620-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03129.x. Epub 2012 Mar 7.

PMID:
22394710
19.

Effectiveness of the DNA barcoding approach for closely related conifers discrimination: A case study of the Pinus mugo complex.

Celiński K, Kijak H, Wojnicka-Półtorak A, Buczkowska-Chmielewska K, Sokołowska J, Chudzińska E.

C R Biol. 2017 Jun - Jul;340(6-7):339-348. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jul 12.

PMID:
28711357
20.

The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region and trnH-psbA [corrected] are suitable candidate loci for DNA barcoding of tropical tree species of India.

Tripathi AM, Tyagi A, Kumar A, Singh A, Singh S, Chaudhary LB, Roy S.

PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057934. Epub 2013 Feb 27. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e105914.

Supplemental Content

Support Center