Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 167

1.

Colorectal polypectomy during insertion and withdrawal or only during withdrawal? A randomized controlled trial.

Wildi SM, Schoepfer AM, Vavricka SR, Fruehauf H, Safroneeva E, Wiegand N, Bauerfeind P, Fried M.

Endoscopy. 2012 Nov;44(11):1019-23. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1310237. Epub 2012 Aug 28.

PMID:
22930173
2.

Cold snare polypectomy vs. Cold forceps polypectomy using double-biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized study.

Lee CK, Shim JJ, Jang JY.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;108(10):1593-600. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.302. Epub 2013 Sep 17.

PMID:
24042189
3.

Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.

DeMarco DC, Odstrcil E, Lara LF, Bass D, Herdman C, Kinney T, Gupta K, Wolf L, Dewar T, Deas TM, Mehta MK, Anwer MB, Pellish R, Hamilton JK, Polter D, Reddy KG, Hanan I.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):542-50. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.021.

PMID:
20189513
4.

Effects of Hyosine N-butyl bromide on the detection of polyps during colonoscopy.

Lee JM, Cheon JH, Park JJ, Moon CM, Kim ES, Kim TI, Kim WH.

Hepatogastroenterology. 2010 Jan-Feb;57(97):90-4.

PMID:
20422879
5.

Prospective randomized comparison of cold snare polypectomy and conventional polypectomy for small colorectal polyps.

Ichise Y, Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Tanaka N.

Digestion. 2011;84(1):78-81. doi: 10.1159/000323959. Epub 2011 Apr 14.

PMID:
21494037
6.

Hyoscine butylbromide administered at the cecum increases polyp detection: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Corte C, Dahlenburg L, Selby W, Griffin S, Byrne C, Chua T, Kaffes A.

Endoscopy. 2012 Oct;44(10):917-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1310009. Epub 2012 Aug 14.

PMID:
22893135
7.

Hyoscine N-butylbromide does not improve polyp detection during colonoscopy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial.

de Brouwer EJ, Arbouw ME, van der Zwet WC, van Herwaarden MA, Ledeboer M, Jansman FG, ter Borg F.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Apr;75(4):835-40. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.12.010. Epub 2012 Feb 7.

PMID:
22317882
8.

Adenoma detection at colonoscopy by polypectomy in withdrawal only versus both insertion and withdrawal: a randomized controlled trial.

Sanaka MR, Parsi MA, Burke CA, Barnes D, Church J, Rizk M, Zein N, Joseph R, Thota PN, Lopez R, Kiran RP.

Surg Endosc. 2015 Mar;29(3):692-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3723-3. Epub 2014 Jul 19.

PMID:
25037727
9.

A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique.

East JE, Stavrindis M, Thomas-Gibson S, Guenther T, Tekkis PP, Saunders BP.

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Sep 15;28(6):768-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03789.x.

10.
11.

Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial.

Fatima H, Rex DK, Rothstein R, Rahmani E, Nehme O, Dewitt J, Helper D, Toor A, Bensen S.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Jan;6(1):109-14. Epub 2007 Dec 11.

PMID:
18065277
12.

Endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps.

Pérez Roldán F, González Carro P, Legaz Huidobro ML, Villafáñez García MC, Soto Fernández S, de Pedro Esteban A, Roncero García-Escribano O, Ruiz Carrillo F.

Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2004 Jan;96(1):36-47. English, Spanish.

13.

Detection of colonic polyps according to insertion/withdrawal phases of colonoscopy.

Morini S, Hassan C, Zullo A, Lorenzetti R, de Matthaeis M, Stella F, Campo SM.

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009 May;24(5):527-30. doi: 10.1007/s00384-009-0633-2. Epub 2009 Feb 5.

PMID:
19194715
14.

Does autofluorescence imaging videoendoscopy system improve the colonoscopic polyp detection rate?--a pilot study.

Matsuda T, Saito Y, Fu KI, Uraoka T, Kobayashi N, Nakajima T, Ikehara H, Mashimo Y, Shimoda T, Murakami Y, Parra-Blanco A, Fujimori T, Saito D.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Aug;103(8):1926-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01931.x. Epub 2008 Jul 18.

PMID:
18647285
15.

170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates.

Deenadayalu VP, Chadalawada V, Rex DK.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Nov;99(11):2138-42.

PMID:
15554993
16.

Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy.

Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M, Tanaka N, Sano K, Graham DY.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Mar;79(3):417-23. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.040. Epub 2013 Oct 11.

PMID:
24125514
17.

Influence of the insertion time and number of polyps on miss rate in colonoscopy.

Kim JH, Kim YS, Cheon JH, Lee SK, Kim TI, Myoung S, Kim WH.

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011 May;46(5):634-9. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2011.558111. Epub 2011 Mar 4.

PMID:
21370993
18.

Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates.

Chung SJ, Kim D, Song JH, Park MJ, Kim YS, Kim JS, Jung HC, Song IS.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jul;72(1):136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.055. Epub 2010 May 20.

PMID:
20493487
19.

Detection of colorectal adenoma by narrow band imaging (HQ190) vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

Leung WK, Lo OS, Liu KS, Tong T, But DY, Lam FY, Hsu AS, Wong SY, Seto WK, Hung IF, Law WL.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun;109(6):855-63. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.83. Epub 2014 Apr 22.

20.

Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study.

Leufkens AM, van Oijen MG, Vleggaar FP, Siersema PD.

Endoscopy. 2012 May;44(5):470-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291666. Epub 2012 Mar 22.

PMID:
22441756

Supplemental Content

Support Center