Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 155

1.

A comparative study to determine the wettability and castability of different elastomeric impression materials.

Reddy GV, Reddy NS, Itttigi J, Jagadeesh KN.

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012 May 1;13(3):356-63.

PMID:
22918010
2.

Surface properties of elastomeric impression materials.

Vassilakos N, Fernandes CP.

J Dent. 1993 Oct;21(5):297-301.

PMID:
8227692
3.

Wettability of elastomeric impression materials and voids in gypsum casts.

Cullen DR, Mikesell JW, Sandrik JL.

J Prosthet Dent. 1991 Aug;66(2):261-5.

PMID:
1774689
4.

Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.

Michalakis KX, Bakopoulou A, Hirayama H, Garefis DP, Garefis PD.

J Prosthodont. 2007 Jul-Aug;16(4):238-48. Epub 2007 Jun 9.

PMID:
17559537
5.

Relationship between contact angles of die stone on elastomeric impression materials and voids in stone casts.

Chong YH, Soh G, Setchell DJ, Wickens JL.

Dent Mater. 1990 Jul;6(3):162-6.

PMID:
2086288
6.

Effect of plasma treatment on the wettability of elastomeric impression materials.

Vassilakos N, Fernandes CP, Nilner K.

J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Aug;70(2):165-71.

PMID:
8371180
7.

Effect of salivary films on the surface properties of elastomeric impression materials.

Vassilakos N, Fernandes CP.

Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1993 Sep;2(1):29-33.

PMID:
8180615
8.

Detail reproduction of soft tissue: a comparison of impression materials.

Pratten DH, Novetsky M.

J Prosthet Dent. 1991 Feb;65(2):188-91.

PMID:
2051353
9.

Surface properties and castability of elastomeric impression materials after plasma cleaning.

Fernandes CP, Vassilakos N, Nilner K.

Dent Mater. 1992 Nov;8(6):354-8.

PMID:
1303381
10.

The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.

Ceyhan JA, Johnson GH, Lepe X.

J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Aug;90(2):143-9. Erratum in: J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Jan;97(1):38.

PMID:
12886207
11.

Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.

Ragain JC, Grosko ML, Raj M, Ryan TN, Johnston WM.

Int J Prosthodont. 2000 May-Jun;13(3):214-20.

PMID:
11203635
12.

Effect of disinfectant solutions on the wettability of elastomeric impression materials.

Pratten DH, Covey DA, Sheats RD.

J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Feb;63(2):223-7.

PMID:
2304027
13.

Wettability of a hydrophilic addition silicone impression material.

Pratten DH, Craig RG.

J Prosthet Dent. 1989 Feb;61(2):197-202.

PMID:
2654364
14.

[Elastomeric impression materials].

Levartovsky S, Folkman M, Alter E, Pilo R.

Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993). 2011 Apr;28(2):54-64, 75. Hebrew.

PMID:
21848031
15.

Hydrophilicity of unset and set elastomeric impression materials.

Rupp F, Geis-Gerstorfer J.

Int J Prosthodont. 2010 Nov-Dec;23(6):552-4.

PMID:
21209992
16.

Relationship between critical convergence angle and surface defects in stone casts.

Soh G, Chong YH.

Quintessence Int. 1990 Aug;21(8):675-9.

PMID:
2094872
17.
18.

The effect of a surface wetting agent on void formation in impressions.

Millar BJ, Dunne SM, Robinson PB.

J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Jan;77(1):54-6.

PMID:
9029466
19.

Wettability of elastomeric impression materials: effect of selected surfactants.

McCormick JT, Antony SJ, Dial ML, Duncanson MG Jr, Shillingburg HT Jr.

Int J Prosthodont. 1989 Sep-Oct;2(5):413-20.

PMID:
2640120
20.

Margin adaptation of indirect composite inlays fabricated on flexible dies.

Price RB, Gerrow JD.

J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Mar;83(3):306-13.

PMID:
10709039

Supplemental Content

Support Center