Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 130

1.

Comparative analysis of postcementation hypersensitivity with glass ionomer cement and a resin cement: an in vivo study.

Shetty RM, Bhat S, Mehta D, Srivatsa G, Shetty YB.

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012 May 1;13(3):327-31.

PMID:
22918005
2.

Effectiveness of desensitizing agents in relieving the pre- and postcementation sensitivity for full coverage restorations: a clinical evaluation.

Gupta N, Reddy UN, Vasundhar PL, Ramarao KS, Varma KP, Vinod V.

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 Sep 1;14(5):858-65.

PMID:
24685788
3.
4.

Clinical comparison of postoperative sensitivity for a glass ionomer and a zinc phosphate luting cement.

Kern M, Kleimeier B, Schaller HG, Strub JR.

J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Feb;75(2):159-62.

PMID:
8667274
5.

An evaluation of retention and marginal seating of Ni-Cr alloy cast restorations using three different luting cements: an in vitro study.

Pattanaik BK, Nagda SJ.

Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Jan-Feb;23(1):20-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.99032.

6.

Prospective observation of a new bioactive luting cement: 2-year follow-up.

Jefferies SR, Pameijer CH, Appleby DC, Boston D, Galbraith C, Lööf J, Glantz PO.

J Prosthodont. 2012 Jan;21(1):33-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00790.x. Epub 2011 Oct 31.

PMID:
22040467
7.

A bioactive dental luting cement--its retentive properties and 3-year clinical findings.

Jefferies SR, Pameijer CH, Appleby DC, Boston D, Lööf J.

Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013 Feb;34 Spec No 1:2-9.

PMID:
23577551
8.

Clinical performance of a bioactive dental luting cement--a prospective clinical pilot study.

Jefferies SR, Appleby D, Boston D, Pameijer CH, Lööf J.

J Clin Dent. 2009;20(7):231-7.

PMID:
20128321
9.

Postoperative tooth sensitivity with a new self-adhesive resin cement--a randomized clinical trial.

Blatz MB, Mante FK, Saleh N, Atlas AM, Mannan S, Ozer F.

Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Apr;17(3):793-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0775-4. Epub 2012 Jul 11.

PMID:
22782256
10.

Metal-ceramic crowns cemented with two luting agents: short-term results of a prospective clinical study.

Piwowarczyk A, Schick K, Lauer HC.

Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Jun;16(3):917-22. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0580-5. Epub 2011 Jun 17.

PMID:
21681387
11.

Microleakage of adhesive and nonadhesive luting cements for stainless steel crowns.

Memarpour M, Mesbahi M, Rezvani G, Rahimi M.

Pediatr Dent. 2011 Nov-Dec;33(7):501-4.

PMID:
22353410
12.

Short-term clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cement.

Yoneda S, Morigami M, Sugizaki J, Yamada T.

Quintessence Int. 2005 Jan;36(1):49-53.

PMID:
15709497
13.
14.
15.

Effect of dentin sealers on postoperative sensitivity of complete cast crowns cemented with glass ionomer cement.

Maghrabi AA.

J Prosthodont. 2011 Jul;20(5):385-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00724.x. Epub 2011 May 31.

PMID:
21627710
16.

Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.

Cano-Batalla J, Soliva-Garriga J, Campillo-Funollet M, Munoz-Viveros CA, Giner-Tarrida L.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Jan-Feb;27(1):36-41.

PMID:
22299076
17.

Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.

Ayad MF.

J Prosthodont. 2009 Feb;18(2):145-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00398.x. Epub 2008 Nov 18.

PMID:
19054303
19.
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center