Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 106

1.

RENAL nephrometry scoring system: the radiologist's perspective.

Parsons RB, Canter D, Kutikov A, Uzzo RG.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Sep;199(3):W355-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.8355.

PMID:
22915426
2.

Comparison of diameter-axial-polar nephrometry and RENAL nephrometry score for treatment decision-making in patients with small renal mass.

Naya Y, Kawauchi A, Oishi M, Ueda T, Fujihara A, Naito Y, Nakamura T, Hongo F, Kamoi K, Okihara K, Miki T.

Int J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr;20(2):358-61. doi: 10.1007/s10147-014-0714-2. Epub 2014 Jun 27.

PMID:
24964973
3.

How can the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system aid management of a solid renal mass?

Wong MH, Cho KY, Ho KL, Wong KW, Lai CT, Man CM, Yiu MK.

Hong Kong Med J. 2014 Feb;20(1):37-44. doi: 10.12809/hkmj133920. Epub 2013 Jul 22.

4.

Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Case 28-2006. A 59-year-old man with masses in both kidneys.

McDougal WS, Tolkoff-Rubin NE, Michaelson MD, Mueller PR, Braaten K.

N Engl J Med. 2006 Sep 14;355(11):1161-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
16971723
5.

The initial experience with RENAL Nephrometry in children, adolescents, and young adults with renal tumors.

Cost NG, DeFoor WR Jr, Crotty EJ, Geller JI.

Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014 Aug;61(8):1434-9. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25027. Epub 2014 Mar 9.

PMID:
24610879
6.

Outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy for renal masses with nephrometry score of ≥7.

White MA, Haber GP, Autorino R, Khanna R, Hernandez AV, Forest S, Yang B, Altunrende F, Stein RJ, Kaouk JH.

Urology. 2011 Apr;77(4):809-13. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.005. Epub 2011 Feb 18.

PMID:
21333338
7.

Surgery-related outcomes and postoperative split renal function by scintigraphy evaluation in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in complex renal tumors: an initial case series.

Tanaka K, Furukawa J, Shigemura K, Hinata N, Ishimura T, Muramaki M, Miyake H, Fujisawa M.

J Endourol. 2015 Jan;29(1):29-34. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0042.

PMID:
25087679
8.

Unusual renal oncocytomas: pathologic and CT correlations.

Honda H, Bonsib S, Barloon TJ, Masuda K.

Urol Radiol. 1992;14(3):148-54.

PMID:
1290201
9.

Usefulness of R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system for predicting outcomes and complications of percutaneous ablation of 751 renal tumors.

Schmit GD, Thompson RH, Kurup AN, Weisbrod AJ, Boorjian SA, Carter RE, Geske JR, Callstrom MR, Atwell TD.

J Urol. 2013 Jan;189(1):30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.180. Epub 2012 Nov 16.

PMID:
23164375
10.

R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score in clinical stage T1 renal mass: Ramathibodi hospital experience.

Prasit S, Sirisreetreerux P, Sangkum P, Kijvikai K, Viseshsindh W, Kongchareonsombat W, Leenanupunth C, Kochakarn W.

J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 Feb;98(2):181-7.

PMID:
25842799
11.

Are urologists and radiologists equally effective in determining the RENAL Nephrometry score?

Benadiba S, Verin AL, Pignot G, Bessede T, Drai J, Bahi R, Toussile W, Rocher L, Patard JJ.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 May;22(5):1618-24. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4152-1. Epub 2014 Nov 11.

PMID:
25384701
12.

Intermediate outcomes and predictors of efficacy in the radiofrequency ablation of 100 pathologically proven renal cell carcinomas.

McClure TD, Chow DS, Tan N, Sayre JA, Pantuck AJ, Raman SS.

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Nov;25(11):1682-8; quiz 1689. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Jul 28.

PMID:
25081202
13.

Tumor Anatomy Scoring and Renal Function for Nephron-Sparing Treatment Selection in Patients With Small Renal Masses: A Microsimulation-Based Decision Analysis.

Kang SK, Huang WC, Skolnik EY, Gervais DA, Braithwaite RS, Pandharipande PV.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Aug;207(2):344-53. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15823. Epub 2016 Jun 15.

PMID:
27305103
14.

Editorial comment from Dr Mitsui to association of renal nephrometry score with outcomes of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.

Mitsui Y.

Int J Urol. 2013 Jun;20(6):571. doi: 10.1111/iju.12032. Epub 2012 Nov 28. No abstract available.

15.

Renal lesions with low R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score are associated with more indolent renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) or benign histology: findings in an Australian cohort.

Satasivam P, Sengupta S, Rajarubendra N, Chia PH, Munshey A, Bolton D.

BJU Int. 2012 Apr;109 Suppl 3:44-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11046.x.

16.

Differential use of partial nephrectomy for intermediate and high complexity tumors may explain variability in reported utilization rates.

Lane BR, Golan S, Eggener S, Tobert CM, Kahnoski RJ, Kutikov A, Smaldone M, Whelan CM, Shalhav A, Uzzo RG.

J Urol. 2013 Jun;189(6):2047-53. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Jan 9.

PMID:
23313207
17.

Editorial comment from Dr Herrel and Dr Canter to association of renal nephrometry score with outcomes of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.

Herrel LA, Canter D.

Int J Urol. 2013 Jun;20(6):570. doi: 10.1111/iju.12006. Epub 2012 Nov 8. No abstract available.

18.

Defining Renal Masses: Comprehensive Comparison of RENAL, PADUA, NePhRO, and C-Index Score.

Kriegmair MC, Mandel P, Moses A, Lenk J, Rothamel M, Budjan J, Michel MS, Wagener N, Pfalzgraf D.

Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Apr;15(2):248-255.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.07.029. Epub 2016 Aug 8.

PMID:
27594556
19.

Renal cell carcinoma in a horse-shoe kidney.

Kumar S, Gupta A, Bansal P, Tiwari P, Kundu AK.

Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2010 Nov;21(6):1147-8. No abstract available.

20.

A multidisciplinary evaluation of inter-reviewer agreement of the nephrometry score and the prediction of long-term outcomes.

Weight CJ, Atwell TD, Fazzio RT, Kim SP, Kenny M, Lohse CM, Boorjian SA, Leibovich BC, Thompson RH.

J Urol. 2011 Oct;186(4):1223-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.05.052. Epub 2011 Aug 17.

PMID:
21849200

Supplemental Content

Support Center