Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 83

1.

How should we use the visual analogue scale (VAS) in rehabilitation outcomes? I: How much of what? The seductive VAS numbers are not true measures.

Franchignoni F, Salaffi F, Tesio L.

J Rehabil Med. 2012 Sep;44(9):798-9; discussion 803-4. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1030. No abstract available.

2.

How should we use the visual analogue scale (VAS) in rehabilitation outcomes? III: On the validation requirements for assessments using VAS with ratio properties.

Harms-Ringdahl K.

J Rehabil Med. 2012 Sep;44(9):801-2; discussion 803-4. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1032. No abstract available.

3.

The use of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in rehabilitation outcomes.

Kersten P, Küçükdeveci AA, Tennant A.

J Rehabil Med. 2012 Jun;44(7):609-10. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0999. No abstract available.

4.

How should we use the visual analogue scale (VAS) in rehabilitation outcomes? II: Visual analogue scales as ratio scales: an alternative to the view of Kersten et al.

Price DD, Staud R, Robinson ME.

J Rehabil Med. 2012 Sep;44(9):800-1; discussion 803-4. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1031. No abstract available.

5.

What pain scales do nurses use in the postanaesthesia care unit?

Aubrun F, Paqueron X, Langeron O, Coriat P, Riou B.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003 Sep;20(9):745-9.

PMID:
12974598
6.

A new analogue scale for assessing children's pain: an initial validation study.

McGrath PA, Seifert CE, Speechley KN, Booth JC, Stitt L, Gibson MC.

Pain. 1996 Mar;64(3):435-43.

PMID:
8783307
7.

Assessment of pain, depression, and anxiety by visual analogue scale in Japanese women with rheumatoid arthritis.

Tamiya N, Araki S, Ohi G, Inagaki K, Urano N, Hirano W, Daltroy LH.

Scand J Caring Sci. 2002 Jun;16(2):137-41.

PMID:
12000666
9.

Evaluation of gastrointestinal symptoms in different patient groups using the visual analogue scale for irritable bowel syndrome (VAS-IBS).

Bengtsson M, Hammar O, Mandl T, Ohlsson B.

BMC Gastroenterol. 2011 Nov 10;11:122. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-11-122.

10.
11.

A modified visual analogue scale for the assessment of chronic pain.

Dones I, Messina G, Nazzi V, Franzini A.

Neurol Sci. 2011 Aug;32(4):731-3. doi: 10.1007/s10072-011-0570-z. Epub 2011 Apr 12.

PMID:
21484359
12.

[Acceptance and understandability of various methods of health valuations for the chronically ill: willingness to pay, visual analogue scale and rating scale].

Meder M, Farin E.

Gesundheitswesen. 2009 Nov;71(11):e1-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1231050. Epub 2009 Jul 20. German.

PMID:
19621280
13.
14.

Responsiveness of pain scales: a comparison of three pain intensity measures in chiropractic patients.

Bolton JE, Wilkinson RC.

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998 Jan;21(1):1-7.

PMID:
9467094
15.

A possible indicator of functional pain: poor pain scale correlation.

Perry F, Heller PH, Levine JD.

Pain. 1991 Aug;46(2):191-3.

PMID:
1749642
16.

Responsiveness of visual analogue and McGill pain scale measures.

Scrimshaw SV, Maher C.

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001 Oct;24(8):501-4.

PMID:
11677548
17.

[Pain in rheumatoid arthritis measured with the visual analogue scale and the Dutch version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire].

van Lankveld W, van 't Pad Bosch P, van de Putte L, van der Staak C, Näring G.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1992 Jun 13;136(24):1166-70. Dutch.

PMID:
1608484
18.
20.

Parent visual analogue scale ratings of children's pain do not reliably reflect pain reported by child.

Kelly AM, Powell CV, Williams A.

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2002 Jun;18(3):159-62.

PMID:
12065998

Supplemental Content

Support Center