Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 118

1.

The disparity of priapulid, archaeopriapulid and palaeoscolecid worms in the light of new data.

Wills MA, Gerber S, Ruta M, Hughes M.

J Evol Biol. 2012 Oct;25(10):2056-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02586.x. Epub 2012 Aug 20.

2.

Mitogenomics and phylogenomics reveal priapulid worms as extant models of the ancestral Ecdysozoan.

Webster BL, Copley RR, Jenner RA, Mackenzie-Dodds JA, Bourlat SJ, Rota-Stabelli O, Littlewood DT, Telford MJ.

Evol Dev. 2006 Nov-Dec;8(6):502-10.

PMID:
17073934
3.

Are palaeoscolecids ancestral ecdysozoans?

Harvey TH, Dong X, Donoghue PC.

Evol Dev. 2010 Mar-Apr;12(2):177-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2010.00403.x.

PMID:
20433458
4.

Phylogeny of extant and fossil Juglandaceae inferred from the integration of molecular and morphological data sets.

Manos PS, Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Manchester SR, Oh SH, Bell CD, Dilcher DL, Stone DE.

Syst Biol. 2007 Jun;56(3):412-30.

PMID:
17558964
6.

The oldest known priapulid-like scalidophoran animal and its implications for the early evolution of cycloneuralians and ecdysozoans.

Liu Y, Xiao S, Shao T, Broce J, Zhang H.

Evol Dev. 2014 May;16(3):155-65. doi: 10.1111/ede.12076. Epub 2014 Apr 23.

PMID:
24754444
7.

Trait-based diversification shifts reflect differential extinction among fossil taxa.

Wagner PJ, Estabrook GF.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Nov 18;111(46):16419-24. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1406304111. Epub 2014 Oct 20.

8.

Relationships of Cetacea (Artiodactyla) among mammals: increased taxon sampling alters interpretations of key fossils and character evolution.

Spaulding M, O'Leary MA, Gatesy J.

PLoS One. 2009 Sep 23;4(9):e7062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007062.

9.
10.
11.

Molecular timetrees reveal a Cambrian colonization of land and a new scenario for ecdysozoan evolution.

Rota-Stabelli O, Daley AC, Pisani D.

Curr Biol. 2013 Mar 4;23(5):392-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.026. Epub 2013 Jan 31.

12.

Morphological and developmental macroevolution: a paleontological perspective.

Valentine JW, Jablonski D.

Int J Dev Biol. 2003;47(7-8):517-22. Review.

13.

A Cambrian peak in morphological variation within trilobite species.

Webster M.

Science. 2007 Jul 27;317(5837):499-502.

15.

Extant-only comparative methods fail to recover the disparity preserved in the bird fossil record.

Mitchell JS.

Evolution. 2015 Sep;69(9):2414-24. doi: 10.1111/evo.12738. Epub 2015 Aug 24.

16.

Morphology of Cambrian lobopodian eyes from the Chengjiang Lagerstätte and their evolutionary significance.

Ma X, Hou X, Aldridge RJ, Siveter DJ, Siveter DJ, Gabbott SE, Purnell MA, Parker AR, Edgecombe GD.

Arthropod Struct Dev. 2012 Sep;41(5):495-504. doi: 10.1016/j.asd.2012.03.002. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

PMID:
22484085
17.

An early Cambrian hemichordate zooid.

Hou XG, Aldridge RJ, Siveter DJ, Siveter DJ, Williams M, Zalasiewicz J, Ma XY.

Curr Biol. 2011 Apr 12;21(7):612-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.005. Epub 2011 Mar 31.

18.

The Cambrian conundrum: early divergence and later ecological success in the early history of animals.

Erwin DH, Laflamme M, Tweedt SM, Sperling EA, Pisani D, Peterson KJ.

Science. 2011 Nov 25;334(6059):1091-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1206375.

19.

[From Vendian to Cambrian: the beginning of morphological disparity of modern Metazoan phyla].

Rozhnov SV.

Ontogenez. 2010 Nov-Dec;41(6):425-37. Review. Russian.

PMID:
21268365
20.

Decoupling of taxonomic diversity and morphological disparity during decline of the Cambrian trilobite family Pterocephaliidae.

Hopkins MJ.

J Evol Biol. 2013 Aug;26(8):1665-76. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12164. Epub 2013 May 23.

Supplemental Content

Support Center