Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 102

1.

Assessing the first 3 years of Taiwan's nationwide population-based mammography screening program.

Chou CP, Pan HB, Hsu GC, Wang YC, Lee SK, Chou YH, Wong KF.

Breast J. 2012 Sep;18(5):498-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2012.01289.x. No abstract available.

PMID:
22897616
2.

[Evaluating the benefits of mammographic breast cancer screening].

Kullmann T, Misset JL.

Orv Hetil. 2010 Aug 29;151(35):1409-14. doi: 10.1556/OH.2010.28864. Hungarian.

PMID:
20719714
3.

Mammography screening: truth, lies, and controversy.

Gøtzsche PC.

Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):218. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61216-1. No abstract available.

PMID:
22817975
4.

German mammography screening program: quality assurance.

Blettner M, Zeissig SR.

Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012 Nov;109(46):779-80. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0779. No abstract available.

5.

Evidence of interval cancer proportional incidence and review from mammography screening programs in Italy.

Ciatto S, Bernardi D, Caumo F.

Tumori. 2011 Jul-Aug;97(4):419-22. doi: 10.1700/950.10391. Review.

6.

[Schematization and forcing of the analysis of mammographic screening effectiveness].

Liberati A.

Epidemiol Prev. 2002 Mar-Apr;26(2):53-4. Italian. No abstract available.

PMID:
12125384
7.

Can missed breast cancer be recognized by regular peer auditing on screening mammography?

Pan HB, Yang TL, Hsu GC, Chiang CL, Huang JS, Chou CP, Wang YC, Liang HL, Lee SK, Chou YH, Wong KF.

J Chin Med Assoc. 2012 Sep;75(9):464-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2012.06.018.

8.

Interval breast cancers: absolute and proportional incidence and blinded review in a community mammographic screening program.

Carbonaro LA, Azzarone A, Paskeh BB, Brambilla G, Brunelli S, Calori A, Caumo F, Malerba P, Menicagli L, Sconfienza LM, Vadalà G, Brambilla G, Fantini L, Ciatto S, Sardanelli F.

Eur J Radiol. 2014 Feb;83(2):e84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.11.025.

PMID:
24369953
9.

Radiologist interpretive volume and breast cancer screening accuracy in a Canadian organized screening program.

Théberge I, Chang SL, Vandal N, Daigle JM, Guertin MH, Pelletier E, Brisson J.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Mar;106(3):djt461. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt461.

10.

[Participation rates in the third round (2006-2007) of the breast cancer screening program in Hungary].

Boncz I, Döbrõssy L, Péntek Z, Kovács A, Budai A, Vajda R, Sebestyén A.

Magy Onkol. 2013 Sep;57(3):140-6. doi: MagyOnkol.2013.57.3.140. Hungarian.

11.

Effect of mammography screening on surgical treatment for breast cancer: a nationwide analysis of hospitalization rates in Germany 2005-2009.

Stang A, Kääb-Sanyal V, Hense HW, Becker N, Kuss O.

Eur J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;28(8):689-96. doi: 10.1007/s10654-013-9816-9.

PMID:
23775424
12.

The outcome of a quality-controlled mammography screening program: experience from a population-based study in Taiwan.

Pan HB, Wong KF, Yang TL, Hsu GC, Chou CP, Huang JS, Lee SK, Chou YH, Chiang CL, Liang HL.

J Chin Med Assoc. 2014 Oct;77(10):531-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2014.06.013.

13.

The incidence of interval cancers in the German mammography screening program: results from the population-based cancer registry in North Rhine-Westphalia.

Heidinger O, Batzler WU, Krieg V, Weigel S, Biesheuvel C, Heindel W, Hense HW.

Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012 Nov;109(46):781-7. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0781.

14.

Reassessment of breast cancers missed during routine screening mammography: a community-based study.

Yankaskas BC, Schell MJ, Bird RE, Desrochers DA.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Sep;177(3):535-41.

PMID:
11517043
15.

Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography: the importance of the question and the critical numbers game.

Brem RF.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Nov;189(5):1142-4. No abstract available. Erratum in: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Sep;191(3):931.

PMID:
17954652
16.

The cumulative risk of false-positive results in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program: updated results.

Roman M, Hubbard RA, Sebuodegard S, Miglioretti DL, Castells X, Hofvind S.

Cancer. 2013 Nov 15;119(22):3952-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28320.

17.

[Attendance in the second phase (2004-2005) of the Hungarian organized breast cancer screening program].

Boncz I, Sebestyén A, Döbrossy L, Péntek Z, Kovács A, Budai A, Kövi R, Ember I.

Orv Hetil. 2008 Aug 10;149(32):1491-8. doi: 10.1556/OH.2008.28248. Hungarian.

PMID:
18672438
18.

Digital mammography screening in Germany: Impact of age and histological subtype on program sensitivity.

Heidinger O, Heidrich J, Batzler WU, Krieg V, Weigel S, Heindel W, Hense HW.

Breast. 2015 Jun;24(3):191-6. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.12.009.

PMID:
25687106
19.

Consensus review of discordant findings maximizes cancer detection rate in double-reader screening mammography: Irish National Breast Screening Program experience.

Shaw CM, Flanagan FL, Fenlon HM, McNicholas MM.

Radiology. 2009 Feb;250(2):354-62. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2502080224.

PMID:
19188311
20.
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center