Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 107

1.

Comparison of postoperative refractive outcomes: IOLMaster® versus immersion ultrasound.

Whang WJ, Jung BJ, Oh TH, Byun YS, Joo CK.

Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2012 Nov-Dec;43(6):496-9. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20120726-03. Epub 2012 Aug 2.

PMID:
22869383
2.

Comparison of refractive outcomes using immersion ultrasound biometry and IOLMaster biometry.

Landers J, Goggin M.

Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Aug;37(6):566-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02091.x.

PMID:
19702705
3.
4.

Refractive outcome of cataract surgery using partial coherence interferometry and ultrasound biometry: clinical feasibility study of a commercial prototype II.

Kiss B, Findl O, Menapace R, Wirtitsch M, Petternel V, Drexler W, Rainer G, Georgopoulos M, Hitzenberger CK, Fercher AF.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Feb;28(2):230-4.

PMID:
11821201
5.

[Accuracy of immersion B-scan ultrasound biometry in high myopic patients with cataract].

Yang Q, Chen B, Peng G, Li Z, Huang Y.

Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jan;50(1):32-6. Chinese.

PMID:
24709131
6.

Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation by the IOLMaster in phakic and eyes with hydrophobic acrylic lenses.

Chang SW, Yu CY, Chen DP.

Ophthalmology. 2009 Jul;116(7):1336-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.035. Epub 2009 May 8.

PMID:
19427697
7.

IOLMaster biometry: refractive results of 100 consecutive cases.

Eleftheriadis H.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Aug;87(8):960-3.

8.

Intraocular lens power measured by partial coherence interferometry.

Hsieh YT, Wang IJ.

Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Dec;89(12):1697-701. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31827717ae.

PMID:
23147857
9.

Intraocular Lens Power Selection after Radial Keratotomy: Topography, Manual, and IOLMaster Keratometry Results Using Haigis Formulas.

Geggel HS.

Ophthalmology. 2015 May;122(5):897-902. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.12.002. Epub 2015 Jan 17.

PMID:
25601534
10.

Immersion A-scan compared with partial coherence interferometry: outcomes analysis.

Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS, Coffman PG, Brown LK.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Feb;28(2):239-42.

PMID:
11821203
11.

Biometry and formula accuracy with intraocular lenses used for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia.

MacLaren RE, Natkunarajah M, Riaz Y, Bourne RR, Restori M, Allan BD.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jun;143(6):920-931.

PMID:
17524766
12.

Influence of operator experience on the performance of ultrasound biometry compared to optical biometry before cataract surgery.

Findl O, Kriechbaum K, Sacu S, Kiss B, Polak K, Nepp J, Schild G, Rainer G, Maca S, Petternel V, Lackner B, Drexler W.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Oct;29(10):1950-5.

PMID:
14604716
13.

Accuracy of predicted refraction with multifocal intraocular lenses using two biometry measurement devices and multiple intraocular lens power calculation formulas.

Reitblat O, Assia EI, Kleinmann G, Levy A, Barrett GD, Abulafia A.

Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 May-Jun;43(4):328-34. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12478. Epub 2015 Jan 14.

PMID:
25491591
14.

Predictive Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation: Comparison of Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry and Immersion Ultrasound Biometry.

Turhan SA, Toker E.

Eye Contact Lens. 2015 Jul;41(4):245-51. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000111.

PMID:
26114979
15.
16.

Value of dual biometry in the detection and investigation of error in the preoperative prediction of refractive status following cataract surgery.

Charalampidou S, Dooley I, Molloy L, Beatty S.

Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Apr;38(3):255-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02211.x.

PMID:
20447121
17.

Comparison of intraocular lens power prediction using immersion ultrasound and optical biometry with and without formula optimization.

Nemeth G, Nagy A, Berta A, Modis L Jr.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep;250(9):1321-5. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-2013-9. Epub 2012 Apr 13.

PMID:
22527318
18.

Agreement analysis of LENSTAR with other techniques of biometry.

Jasvinder S, Khang TF, Sarinder KK, Loo VP, Subrayan V.

Eye (Lond). 2011 Jun;25(6):717-24. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.28. Epub 2011 Mar 11.

19.

Comparison of IOL power calculation methods and intraoperative wavefront aberrometer in eyes after refractive surgery.

Canto AP, Chhadva P, Cabot F, Galor A, Yoo SH, Vaddavalli PK, Culbertson WW.

J Refract Surg. 2013 Jul;29(7):484-9. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20130617-07.

PMID:
23820231
20.

[Comparison of contact and immersion techniques of ultrasound biometry in terms of target postoperative refraction].

Hrebcová J, Skorkovská S, Vasků A.

Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2009 Jul;65(4):143-6. Czech.

PMID:
19750832

Supplemental Content

Support Center