Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 114


Quantitative and qualitative assessment of structural magnetic resonance imaging data in a two-center study.

Chalavi S, Simmons A, Dijkstra H, Barker GJ, Reinders AA.

BMC Med Imaging. 2012 Aug 6;12:27.


Brain morphometry reproducibility in multi-center 3T MRI studies: a comparison of cross-sectional and longitudinal segmentations.

Jovicich J, Marizzoni M, Sala-Llonch R, Bosch B, Bartrés-Faz D, Arnold J, Benninghoff J, Wiltfang J, Roccatagliata L, Nobili F, Hensch T, Tränkner A, Schönknecht P, Leroy M, Lopes R, Bordet R, Chanoine V, Ranjeva JP, Didic M, Gros-Dagnac H, Payoux P, Zoccatelli G, Alessandrini F, Beltramello A, Bargalló N, Blin O, Frisoni GB; PharmaCog Consortium..

Neuroimage. 2013 Dec;83:472-84. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 May 11.


Optimizing the automatic segmentation of the left ventricle in magnetic resonance images.

Angelie E, de Koning PJ, Danilouchkine MG, van Assen HC, Koning G, van der Geest RJ, Reiber JH.

Med Phys. 2005 Feb;32(2):369-75.


Improved volumetric measurement of brain structure with a distortion correction procedure using an ADNI phantom.

Maikusa N, Yamashita F, Tanaka K, Abe O, Kawaguchi A, Kabasawa H, Chiba S, Kasahara A, Kobayashi N, Yuasa T, Sato N, Matsuda H, Iwatsubo T; Japanese Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative..

Med Phys. 2013 Jun;40(6):062303. doi: 10.1118/1.4801913.


Multi-parametric neuroimaging reproducibility: a 3-T resource study.

Landman BA, Huang AJ, Gifford A, Vikram DS, Lim IA, Farrell JA, Bogovic JA, Hua J, Chen M, Jarso S, Smith SA, Joel S, Mori S, Pekar JJ, Barker PB, Prince JL, van Zijl PC.

Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 14;54(4):2854-66. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.047. Epub 2010 Nov 20.


Introduction of an automated user-independent quantitative volumetric magnetic resonance imaging breast density measurement system using the Dixon sequence: comparison with mammographic breast density assessment.

Wengert GJ, Helbich TH, Vogl WD, Baltzer P, Langs G, Weber M, Bogner W, Gruber S, Trattnig S, Pinker K.

Invest Radiol. 2015 Feb;50(2):73-80. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000102.


Magnetic resonance imaging acquisition techniques intended to decrease movement artefact in paediatric brain imaging: a systematic review.

Woodfield J, Kealey S.

Pediatr Radiol. 2015 Aug;45(9):1271-81. doi: 10.1007/s00247-015-3333-9. Epub 2015 Mar 28. Review.


Prospective multi-centre Voxel Based Morphometry study employing scanner specific segmentations: procedure development using CaliBrain structural MRI data.

Moorhead TW, Gountouna VE, Job DE, McIntosh AM, Romaniuk L, Lymer GK, Whalley HC, Waiter GD, Brennan D, Ahearn TS, Cavanagh J, Condon B, Steele JD, Wardlaw JM, Lawrie SM.

BMC Med Imaging. 2009 May 15;9:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-9-8.


Assessing atrophy measurement techniques in dementia: Results from the MIRIAD atrophy challenge.

Cash DM, Frost C, Iheme LO, Ünay D, Kandemir M, Fripp J, Salvado O, Bourgeat P, Reuter M, Fischl B, Lorenzi M, Frisoni GB, Pennec X, Pierson RK, Gunter JL, Senjem ML, Jack CR Jr, Guizard N, Fonov VS, Collins DL, Modat M, Cardoso MJ, Leung KK, Wang H, Das SR, Yushkevich PA, Malone IB, Fox NC, Schott JM, Ourselin S.

Neuroimage. 2015 Dec;123:149-64. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.087. Epub 2015 Aug 11.


Interplay between intensity standardization and inhomogeneity correction in MR image processing.

Madabhushi A, Udupa JK.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005 May;24(5):561-76.


A comprehensive testing protocol for MRI neuroanatomical segmentation techniques: Evaluation of a novel lateral ventricle segmentation method.

Kempton MJ, Underwood TS, Brunton S, Stylios F, Schmechtig A, Ettinger U, Smith MS, Lovestone S, Crum WR, Frangou S, Williams SC, Simmons A.

Neuroimage. 2011 Oct 15;58(4):1051-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.080. Epub 2011 Jul 30.


MRI-derived measurements of human subcortical, ventricular and intracranial brain volumes: Reliability effects of scan sessions, acquisition sequences, data analyses, scanner upgrade, scanner vendors and field strengths.

Jovicich J, Czanner S, Han X, Salat D, van der Kouwe A, Quinn B, Pacheco J, Albert M, Killiany R, Blacker D, Maguire P, Rosas D, Makris N, Gollub R, Dale A, Dickerson BC, Fischl B.

Neuroimage. 2009 May 15;46(1):177-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.010. Epub 2009 Feb 20.


Deformation-based brain morphometry in rats.

Gaser C, Schmidt S, Metzler M, Herrmann KH, Krumbein I, Reichenbach JR, Witte OW.

Neuroimage. 2012 Oct 15;63(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.066. Epub 2012 Jul 6.


Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.

Mendichovszky IA, Cutajar M, Gordon I.

Eur J Radiol. 2009 Sep;71(3):576-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.09.025. Epub 2008 Nov 11.


The osteoarthritis initiative: report on the design rationale for the magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the knee.

Peterfy CG, Schneider E, Nevitt M.

Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008 Dec;16(12):1433-41. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2008.06.016. Epub 2008 Sep 10. Review.


Reproducibility and biases in high field brain diffusion MRI: An evaluation of acquisition and analysis variables.

Papinutto ND, Maule F, Jovicich J.

Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Jul;31(6):827-39. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 Apr 24.


Voxel-based iterative sensitivity (VBIS) analysis: methods and a validation of intensity scaling for T2-weighted imaging of hippocampal sclerosis.

Abbott DF, Pell GS, Pardoe H, Jackson GD.

Neuroimage. 2009 Feb 1;44(3):812-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.055. Epub 2008 Oct 19.


Reproducibility of single-subject fMRI language mapping with AMPLE normalization.

Voyvodic JT.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Sep;36(3):569-80. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23686. Epub 2012 May 11.

Supplemental Content

Support Center