Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 73

1.

Meaningful comparison of robotics versus laparoscopy for nephron-sparing surgery: no contest or no dice?

Corcoran AT, Kutikov A, Uzzo RG.

Eur Urol. 2012 Dec;62(6):1037-8; discussion 1038-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.038. Epub 2012 Jul 25. No abstract available.

PMID:
22854246
2.

Minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery.

Berger A, Crouzet S, Canes D, Haber GP, Gill IS.

Curr Opin Urol. 2008 Sep;18(5):462-6. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32830a4f10. Review.

PMID:
18670268
3.

[Robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: techniques and outcomes].

Altunrende F, Autorino R, Laydner H, White MA, Yang B, Khanna R, Hillyer S, Isac W, Spana G, Stein RJ, Haber GP, Kaouk JH.

Arch Esp Urol. 2011 May;64(4):325-36. Review. Spanish.

PMID:
21610276
4.

A matched comparison of perioperative outcomes of a single laparoscopic surgeon versus a multisurgeon robot-assisted cohort for partial nephrectomy.

Ellison JS, Montgomery JS, Wolf JS Jr, Hafez KS, Miller DC, Weizer AZ.

J Urol. 2012 Jul;188(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.2570. Epub 2012 May 12.

PMID:
22578725
5.

Robotic partial nephrectomy: a comparison to current techniques.

Patel MN, Menon M, Rogers CG.

Urol Oncol. 2010 Jan-Feb;28(1):74-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.03.020. Review.

PMID:
20123352
6.

A robotic-assisted laparoscopic approach for pediatric renal cell carcinoma allows for both nephron-sparing surgery and extended lymph node dissection.

Cost NG, Geller JI, DeFoor WR Jr, Wagner LM, Noh PH.

J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Oct;47(10):1946-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.08.017.

PMID:
23084214
7.

Robotic partial nephrectomy: the real benefit.

Rogers C, Sukumar S, Gill IS.

Curr Opin Urol. 2011 Jan;21(1):60-4. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3283402232. Review.

PMID:
20962648
8.

[Robotic partial nephrectomy: development and advantages].

de Gorski A, Iselin CE.

Rev Med Suisse. 2011 Dec 7;7(320):2410-3. French.

PMID:
22232871
9.

The role of ischemia, or the lack thereof, during partial nephrectomy.

Weight CJ, Thompson RH.

Eur Urol. 2012 Jan;61(1):75-6; discussion 76-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.08.077. Epub 2011 Sep 13. No abstract available.

PMID:
21930340
10.

Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aboumarzouk OM, Stein RJ, Eyraud R, Haber GP, Chlosta PL, Somani BK, Kaouk JH.

Eur Urol. 2012 Dec;62(6):1023-33. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.038. Epub 2012 Jun 27. Review.

PMID:
22771266
11.

Trends in nephron-sparing surgery for renal neoplasia.

Bhayani SB, Belani JS, Hidalgo J, Figenshau RS, Landman J, Venkatesh R, Kibel AS.

Urology. 2006 Oct;68(4):732-6.

PMID:
17070343
12.

[Recent advances in nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma].

Igarashi T, Tobe T, Ito H.

Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2002 Oct;29(10):1726-31. Review. Japanese.

PMID:
12402421
13.

The role of nephron-sparing robotic surgery in the management of renal malignancy.

Shapiro E, Benway BM, Wang AJ, Bhayani SB.

Curr Opin Urol. 2009 Jan;19(1):76-80. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32831a47a2. Review.

PMID:
19057221
14.

Nephron-sparing surgery: current developments and controversies.

Carini M, Minervini A, Serni S.

Eur Urol. 2007 Jan;51(1):12-4. Epub 2006 Sep 15. No abstract available.

PMID:
17010506
15.

Positive surgical margins after nephron-sparing surgery.

Marszalek M, Carini M, Chlosta P, Jeschke K, Kirkali Z, Knüchel R, Madersbacher S, Patard JJ, Van Poppel H.

Eur Urol. 2012 Apr;61(4):757-63. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.11.028. Epub 2011 Nov 24. Review.

PMID:
22136987
16.

Efficacy and safety of nephron-sparing surgery.

Van Poppel H.

Int J Urol. 2010 Apr;17(4):314-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02482.x. Review.

17.

Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for bilateral synchronous kidney tumors: single-institution comparative analysis.

Hillyer SP, Autorino R, Laydner H, Yang B, Altunrende F, White M, Spana G, Khanna R, Isac W, Hernandez AV, Simmons M, Stein R, Haber GP, Kaouk J.

Urology. 2011 Oct;78(4):808-12. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.06.012.

PMID:
21855967
18.

Early comparison of nephrectomy options in children (open, transperitoneal laparoscopic, laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS), and robotic surgery).

Lendvay TS.

BJU Int. 2012 Mar;109(6):915-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10545.x. Epub 2011 Aug 23. No abstract available.

19.

Selective renal parenchymal clamping in robotic partial nephrectomy: initial experience.

Viprakasit DP, Altamar HO, Miller NL, Herrell SD.

Urology. 2010 Sep;76(3):750-3. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.051. Epub 2010 Jun 8.

PMID:
20570318
20.

[Evolution of open versus laparoscopic/robotic surgery: 10 years of changes in urology].

Peña González JA, Pascual Queralt M, Salvador Bayarri JT, Rosales Bordes A, Palou Redorta J, Villavicencio Mavrich H.

Actas Urol Esp. 2010 Mar;34(3):223-31. Spanish.

PMID:
20416238

Supplemental Content

Support Center