Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 119

1.

Does the non-identity problem imply a double standard for physicians and patients?

Roberts MA.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(8):38-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.692448. No abstract available.

PMID:
22852543
2.

Impersonalism in bioethics.

Ranisch R.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(8):40-1. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.692441. No abstract available.

PMID:
22852544
3.

The right not to be born: reinterpreting the nonidentity problem.

Jecker NS.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(8):34-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.692449. No abstract available.

PMID:
22852541
4.

A sufficient limit to "reasonable" choices.

DeCamp M.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(8):36-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.692569. No abstract available.

PMID:
22852542
5.

Advantageous interventions: will someone be healed?

Zohar N.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(8):32-3. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.692437. No abstract available.

PMID:
22852540
6.

Selecting for disability: acceptable lives, acceptable reasons.

Wasserman D, Asch A.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(8):30-1. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.692445. No abstract available.

PMID:
22852539
7.

Physicians' duties and the non-identity problem.

Hope T, McMillan J.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(8):21-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.692432.

PMID:
22852538
8.

Physician integrity: why it is inviolable.

Pellegrino ED.

Hastings Cent Rep. 2009;Suppl:18-20. No abstract available.

PMID:
19891271
9.

Response to: 'Questioning the significance of the non-identity problem in applied ethics' by Lawlor.

Hope T.

J Med Ethics. 2015 Nov;41(11):897-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102795. Epub 2015 May 14. No abstract available.

PMID:
25975602
10.

Prenatal screening, autonomy and reasons: the relationship between the law of abortion and wrongful birth.

Scott R.

Med Law Rev. 2003 Autumn;11(3):265-325. No abstract available.

PMID:
16733877
11.

Questioning the significance of the non-identity problem in applied ethics: a reply to Tony Hope.

Lawlor R.

J Med Ethics. 2015 Nov;41(11):899-900. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102951. Epub 2015 Aug 21. Erratum in: J Med Ethics. 2016 Dec 1;:. J Med Ethics. 2017 May;43(5):350.

PMID:
26297606
12.

Questioning the significance of the non-identity problem in applied ethics.

Lawlor R.

J Med Ethics. 2015 Nov;41(11):893-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102391. Epub 2015 May 20.

PMID:
25995274
13.

Balancing consciences: how our obsession with autonomy sacrifices our duty to our patients.

Shah KR.

Hum Reprod Genet Ethics. 2010;16(2):233-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
22533037
14.

Reproductive autonomy and normalization of cesarean section.

Tsu PS.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(7):61-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.680538. No abstract available.

PMID:
22694042
15.

Beliefs, boundaries, and self-knowledge in professional practice.

Kozishek D, Bogdan-Lovis E.

J Clin Ethics. 2008 Spring;19(1):26-30. No abstract available.

PMID:
18552050
16.

Should Physicians Attempt to Persuade a Patient to Accept a Compromised Organ for Transplant?

Tully AA, Diaz GC, Renz JF.

AMA J Ethics. 2016 Feb 1;18(2):101-7. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.2.ecas1-1602. No abstract available.

17.

Relational autonomy on the cutting edge.

Berkhout S.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(7):59-61. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.680797. No abstract available.

PMID:
22694041
18.

The importance of risk tolerance in maternal autonomy.

Kapfhamer JD, Menon S, Spellecy R.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(7):53-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.680537. No abstract available.

PMID:
22694037
19.

On the cutting edge: ethical responsiveness to cesarean rates.

Burrow S.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(7):44-52. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.673689.

PMID:
22694036
20.

Increasing cesarean rates: the balance of technology, autonomy, and beneficence.

Shah KR.

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(7):58-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.680536. No abstract available.

PMID:
22694040

Supplemental Content

Support Center