Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 101

1.

The impetus theory in judgments about object motion: a new perspective.

White PA.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Dec;19(6):1007-28. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0302-2. Review.

PMID:
22851410
3.

Perception of forces exerted by objects in collision events.

White PA.

Psychol Rev. 2009 Jul;116(3):580-601. doi: 10.1037/a0016337.

PMID:
19618988
4.

Human heading judgments in the presence of moving objects.

Royden CS, Hildreth EC.

Percept Psychophys. 1996 Aug;58(6):836-56.

PMID:
8768180
5.

Constructing naive theories of motion on the fly.

Cooke NJ, Breedin SD.

Mem Cognit. 1994 Jul;22(4):474-93.

PMID:
7934951
6.

Judgments about forces in described interactions between objects.

White PA.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jul;37(4):979-93. doi: 10.1037/a0023258.

PMID:
21480755
7.

Sources of uncertainty in intuitive physics.

Smith KA, Vul E.

Top Cogn Sci. 2013 Jan;5(1):185-99. doi: 10.1111/tops.12009.

8.

Differential effects of shared attention on perception of heading and 3-D object motion.

Royden CS, Hildreth EC.

Percept Psychophys. 1999 Jan;61(1):120-33.

PMID:
10070204
9.
10.

Integration across Time Determines Path Deviation Discrimination for Moving Objects.

Whitaker D, Levi DM, Kennedy GJ.

PLoS One. 2008 Apr 16;3(4):e1930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001930.

11.

Reconciling intuitive physics and Newtonian mechanics for colliding objects.

Sanborn AN, Mansinghka VK, Griffiths TL.

Psychol Rev. 2013 Apr;120(2):411-37. doi: 10.1037/a0031912. Epub 2013 Mar 4.

PMID:
23458084
12.
13.

Judgements about the relation between force and trajectory variables in verbally described ballistic projectile motion.

White PA.

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(5):876-94. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.721790. Epub 2012 Oct 17.

PMID:
23075337
14.

The developmental origins of naïve psychology in infancy.

Poulin-Dubois D, Brooker I, Chow V.

Adv Child Dev Behav. 2009;37:55-104. Review.

PMID:
19673160
15.
16.

The influence of visual motion on interceptive actions and perception.

Marinovic W, Plooy AM, Arnold DH.

Vision Res. 2012 May 1;60:73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.03.010. Epub 2012 Mar 29.

17.

Visual Mislocalization of Moving Objects in an Audiovisual Event.

Kawachi Y.

PLoS One. 2016 Apr 25;11(4):e0154147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154147. eCollection 2016.

18.

Different motion cues are used to estimate time-to-arrival for frontoparallel and looming trajectories.

Calabro FJ, Beardsley SA, Vaina LM.

Vision Res. 2011 Dec 8;51(23-24):2378-85. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.09.016. Epub 2011 Oct 26.

19.

Human heading judgments and object-based motion information.

Cutting JE, Wang RF, Flückiger M, Baumberger B.

Vision Res. 1999 Mar;39(6):1079-105.

20.

The shape of the scene background determines the perceived path of a moving object.

Zhang J, Braunstein ML, Andersen GJ.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Dec;40(6):2117-23. doi: 10.1037/a0037896. Epub 2014 Sep 1.

PMID:
25181369

Supplemental Content

Support Center