Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 99

1.

Inverse MDS: Inferring Dissimilarity Structure from Multiple Item Arrangements.

Kriegeskorte N, Mur M.

Front Psychol. 2012 Jul 25;3:245. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00245. eCollection 2012.

2.

Modified multidimensional scaling approach to analyze financial markets.

Yin Y, Shang P.

Chaos. 2014 Jun;24(2):022102. doi: 10.1063/1.4873523.

PMID:
24985414
3.

Multidimensional Scaling of Sorting Data: A Comparison of Three Procedures.

Van der Kloot WA, Van Herk H.

Multivariate Behav Res. 1991 Oct 1;26(4):563-81. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2604_1.

PMID:
26751022
4.

The versatility of SpAM: a fast, efficient, spatial method of data collection for multidimensional scaling.

Hout MC, Goldinger SD, Ferguson RW.

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Feb;142(1):256-281. doi: 10.1037/a0028860. Epub 2012 Jul 2.

5.

The triangle inequality constraint in similarity judgments.

Yearsley JM, Barque-Duran A, Scerrati E, Hampton JA, Pothos EM.

Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2017 Nov;130(Pt A):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.03.005. Epub 2017 Mar 28.

PMID:
28363422
6.

Representation of lesion similarity by use of multidimensional scaling for breast masses on mammograms.

Muramatsu C, Nishimura K, Endo T, Oiwa M, Shiraiwa M, Doi K, Fujita H.

J Digit Imaging. 2013 Aug;26(4):740-7. doi: 10.1007/s10278-012-9569-0.

7.

The labeled dissimilarity scale: a metric of perceptual dissimilarity.

Kurtz DB, White TL, Hayes M.

Percept Psychophys. 2000 Jan;62(1):152-61.

PMID:
10703263
8.

Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study.

Macherey O, Delpierre A.

Ear Hear. 2013 Jul-Aug;34(4):426-36. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31827535f8.

PMID:
23334356
9.

Multidimensional Scaling Of Derived Dissimilarities.

Dragsgow F, Jones LE.

Multivariate Behav Res. 1979 Apr 1;14(2):227-44. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1402_7.

PMID:
26815154
10.

Graphical exploration of network meta-analysis data: the use of multidimensional scaling.

Chung H, Lumley T.

Clin Trials. 2008;5(4):301-7. doi: 10.1177/1740774508093614.

PMID:
18697844
12.

Individual differences in perceptual space for tactile textures: evidence from multidimensional scaling.

Hollins M, Bensmaïa S, Karlof K, Young F.

Percept Psychophys. 2000 Nov;62(8):1534-44.

PMID:
11140177
13.
14.

Bicriterion methods for partitioning dissimilarity matrices.

Brusco MJ, Cradit JD.

Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2005 Nov;58(Pt 2):319-32.

PMID:
16293203
15.

Visualizing Similarity of Appearance by Arrangement of Cards.

Nakatsuji N, Ihara H, Seno T, Ito H.

Front Psychol. 2016 May 13;7:698. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00698. eCollection 2016.

16.

Dissimilarity for functional data clustering based on smoothing parameter commutation.

Tzeng S, Hennig C, Li YF, Lin CJ.

Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Jan 1:962280217710050. doi: 10.1177/0962280217710050. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
28535712
17.

Ordination with any dissimilarity measure: a weighted Euclidean solution.

Greenacre M.

Ecology. 2017 Sep;98(9):2293-2300. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1937. Epub 2017 Aug 22.

PMID:
28636183
18.

Perceptual differences between vowels located in a limited phonetic space.

Kewley-Port D, Atal BS.

J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Apr;85(4):1726-40.

PMID:
2708689
19.

Theory and algorithm for learning with dissimilarity functions.

Wang L, Sugiyama M, Yang C, Hatano K, Feng J.

Neural Comput. 2009 May;21(5):1459-84. doi: 10.1162/neco.2008.08-06-805.

PMID:
19718819
20.

An improved model for whole genome phylogenetic analysis by Fourier transform.

Yin C, Yau SS.

J Theor Biol. 2015 Oct 7;382:99-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.06.033. Epub 2015 Jul 4.

PMID:
26151589

Supplemental Content

Support Center