Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 127

1.

The Berkeley Rudimentary Vision Test.

Bailey IL, Jackson AJ, Minto H, Greer RB, Chu MA.

Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Sep;89(9):1257-64. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318264e85a.

PMID:
22842307
2.

Comparison of LogMAR Eye charts with angular vision for visually impaired: the Berkeley rudimentary vision test vs LogMAR One target Landolt ring Eye chart.

Miwa M, Iwanami M, Oba MS, Mizuki N, Nishida T.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec;251(12):2761-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2469-2. Epub 2013 Sep 22.

PMID:
24057176
3.

Improving the reliability of visual acuity measures in young children.

McGraw PV, Winn B, Gray LS, Elliott DB.

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2000 May;20(3):173-84.

PMID:
10897339
4.
5.
6.

Glasgow Acuity Cards: a new test for the measurement of letter acuity in children.

McGraw PV, Winn B.

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1993 Oct;13(4):400-4.

PMID:
8278195
7.

[Comparison of visual acuity measured using Landolt-C and ETDRS charts in healthy subjects and patients with various eye diseases].

Becker R, Teichler G, Gräf M.

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2011 Oct;228(10):864-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1281758. Epub 2011 Oct 13. German.

PMID:
21997822
8.

Comparison of visual acuity charts in young adults and patients with diabetic retinopathy.

Plainis S, Kontadakis G, Feloni E, Giannakopoulou T, Tsilimbaris MK, Pallikaris IG, Moschandreas J.

Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Feb;90(2):174-8. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31827ce251.

PMID:
23314130
10.

The effects of blur and eccentric viewing on adult acuity for pediatric tests: implications for amblyopia detection.

Formankiewicz MA, Waugh SJ.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct 23;54(10):6934-43. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12543.

PMID:
24071956
11.

A modified letter matching chart for testing young children's visual acuity.

Hedin A, Nyman KG, Derouet B.

J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1980 Mar-Apr;17(2):114-8.

PMID:
7391898
12.

[Landolt C and snellen e acuity: differences in strabismus amblyopia?].

Becker R, Gräf M.

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2006 Jan;223(1):24-8. German.

PMID:
16418930
13.

Computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol.

Moke PS, Turpin AH, Beck RW, Holmes JM, Repka MX, Birch EE, Hertle RW, Kraker RT, Miller JM, Johnson CA.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2001 Dec;132(6):903-9.

PMID:
11730656
14.

Comparison of the HOTV and Lea symbols visual acuity tests in patients with amblyopia.

Ruttum MS, Dahlgren M.

J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2006 May-Jun;43(3):157-60.

PMID:
16761636
15.

Computer-based test to measure optimal visual acuity in age-related macular degeneration.

González EG, Tarita-Nistor L, Markowitz SN, Steinbach MJ.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Oct;48(10):4838-45.

PMID:
17898311
16.

Distance and near visual acuity in infantile nystagmus.

Hanson KS, Bedell HE, White JM, Ukwade MT.

Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Nov;83(11):823-9.

PMID:
17106409
17.

Comparison of Patti Pics and Lea Symbols optotypes in children and adults.

Mercer ME, Drover JR, Penney KJ, Courage ML, Adams RJ.

Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Mar;90(3):236-41. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182825eb7.

PMID:
23376895
18.

Using the KM visual acuity chart for more reliable evaluation of amblyopia compared to the HVOT method.

Moutakis K, Stigmar G, Hall-Lindberg J.

Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004 Oct;82(5):547-51.

19.
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center