Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 279

1.

Acoustic cue integration in speech intonation recognition with cochlear implants.

Peng SC, Chatterjee M, Lu N.

Trends Amplif. 2012 Jun;16(2):67-82. doi: 10.1177/1084713812451159. Epub 2012 Jul 11.

2.

Effects of cooperating and conflicting cues on speech intonation recognition by cochlear implant users and normal hearing listeners.

Peng SC, Lu N, Chatterjee M.

Audiol Neurootol. 2009;14(5):327-37. doi: 10.1159/000212112. Epub 2009 Apr 15.

3.

Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.

Carroll J, Tiaden S, Zeng FG.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Oct;130(4):2054-62. doi: 10.1121/1.3631563.

4.
5.

Using speech sounds to test functional spectral resolution in listeners with cochlear implants.

Winn MB, Litovsky RY.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Mar;137(3):1430-42. doi: 10.1121/1.4908308.

6.

Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.

Goldsworthy RL, Delhorne LA, Braida LD, Reed CM.

Trends Amplif. 2013 Mar;17(1):27-44. doi: 10.1177/1084713813477244. Epub 2013 Feb 21.

7.

Rate and onset cues can improve cochlear implant synthetic vowel recognition in noise.

Mc Laughlin M, Reilly RB, Zeng FG.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Mar;133(3):1546-60. doi: 10.1121/1.4789940.

8.

Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: contributions of static and dynamic spectral cues.

Donaldson GS, Rogers CL, Cardenas ES, Russell BA, Hanna NH.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Oct;134(4):3021-8. doi: 10.1121/1.4820894.

PMID:
24116437
9.

Voice emotion recognition by cochlear-implanted children and their normally-hearing peers.

Chatterjee M, Zion DJ, Deroche ML, Burianek BA, Limb CJ, Goren AP, Kulkarni AM, Christensen JA.

Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:151-62. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Oct 16.

10.

Contour identification with pitch and loudness cues using cochlear implants.

Luo X, Masterson ME, Wu CC.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Jan;135(1):EL8-14. doi: 10.1121/1.4832915.

11.

Consonant recognition as a function of the number of stimulation channels in the Hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant.

Reiss LA, Turner CW, Karsten SA, Erenberg SR, Taylor J, Gantz BJ.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Nov;132(5):3406-17. doi: 10.1121/1.4757735.

12.

Top-down restoration of speech in cochlear-implant users.

Bhargava P, Gaudrain E, Ba┼čkent D.

Hear Res. 2014 Mar;309:113-23. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 22.

PMID:
24368138
13.

The ability of cochlear implant users to use temporal envelope cues recovered from speech frequency modulation.

Won JH, Lorenzi C, Nie K, Li X, Jameyson EM, Drennan WR, Rubinstein JT.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):1113-9. doi: 10.1121/1.4726013.

14.

Speech perception in simulated electric hearing exploits information-bearing acoustic change.

Stilp CE, Goupell MJ, Kluender KR.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Feb;133(2):EL136-41. doi: 10.1121/1.4776773.

15.

Discrimination of intonation contours by adolescents with cochlear implants.

Holt CM, McDermott HJ.

Int J Audiol. 2013 Dec;52(12):808-15. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.832416. Epub 2013 Sep 20.

PMID:
24053225
16.

Combined spectral and temporal enhancement to improve cochlear-implant speech perception.

Bhattacharya A, Vandali A, Zeng FG.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Nov;130(5):2951-60. doi: 10.1121/1.3641401.

17.

Spatial hearing benefits demonstrated with presentation of acoustic temporal fine structure cues in bilateral cochlear implant listeners.

Churchill TH, Kan A, Goupell MJ, Litovsky RY.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Sep;136(3):1246. doi: 10.1121/1.4892764.

18.

Evidence of across-channel processing for spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant listeners.

Won JH, Jones GL, Drennan WR, Jameyson EM, Rubinstein JT.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Oct;130(4):2088-97. doi: 10.1121/1.3624820.

19.

The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.

Saripella R, Loizou PC, Thibodeau L, Alford JA.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Nov;130(5):3028-37. doi: 10.1121/1.3641407.

20.

Effects of speaking style on speech intelligibility for Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Li Y, Zhang G, Kang HY, Liu S, Han D, Fu QJ.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jun;129(6):EL242-7. doi: 10.1121/1.3582148.

Supplemental Content

Support Center