Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 98

1.

"A robot saved my life": is it a myth?

Bjartell A.

Eur Urol. 2012 Nov;62(5):775-6; discussion 777-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.051. Epub 2012 Jul 7. No abstract available.

PMID:
22790290
2.

Biochemical recurrence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up.

Menon M, Bhandari M, Gupta N, Lane Z, Peabody JO, Rogers CG, Sammon J, Siddiqui SA, Diaz M.

Eur Urol. 2010 Dec;58(6):838-46. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.09.010. Epub 2010 Sep 17.

PMID:
20869162
3.

A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload.

Di Pierro GB, Baumeister P, Stucki P, Beatrice J, Danuser H, Mattei A.

Eur Urol. 2011 Jan;59(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.10.026. Epub 2010 Oct 21.

PMID:
21035248
4.

Additional evidence for improved functional outcomes following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Fuller A, Pautler SE.

Eur Urol. 2011 Sep;60(3):420-1; discussion 421-2. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.037. Epub 2011 May 25. No abstract available.

PMID:
21621911
5.

Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Patel VR, Sivaraman A, Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Palmer KJ, Orvieto MA, Camacho I, Coughlin G, Rocco B.

Eur Urol. 2011 May;59(5):702-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.032. Epub 2011 Jan 25.

PMID:
21296482
6.

Re: factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic.

Peyromaure M.

Eur Urol. 2012 Jan;61(1):220-1. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.016. No abstract available.

PMID:
22122874
7.

A plea to young surgeons dealing with radical prostatectomy patients: invest your time and intellectual energy in optimizing your research methodology and keep your feet on the ground.

Montorsi F.

Eur Urol. 2010 Dec;58(6):847-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.09.025. Epub 2010 Sep 23. No abstract available.

PMID:
20926178
8.

Update on robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Matsunaga GS, Ahlering TE, Skarecky DW.

ScientificWorldJournal. 2006 Feb 17;6:2542-52. Review.

9.

Yes to careful introduction of robot assisted surgery.

McNeill A, Stewart GD.

BMJ. 2011 Nov 8;343:d7215. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7215. No abstract available.

PMID:
22077086
10.

Future directions of robotic surgery: a case study of the Cornell athermal robotic technique of prostatectomy.

Leung RA, Kim TS, Tewari AK.

ScientificWorldJournal. 2006 Mar 19;6:2553-9. Review.

11.

Early oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high-grade prostate cancer.

Wambi CO, Siddiqui SA, Krane LS, Agarwal PK, Stricker HJ, Peabody JO.

BJU Int. 2010 Dec;106(11):1739-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09484.x.

12.

Next-generation prostate-specific antigen test: ready to use?

Bjartell AS.

Eur Urol. 2013 Nov;64(5):700-2. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.052. Epub 2013 Jul 5. No abstract available.

PMID:
23850253
13.

[New developments in diagnosis and therapy of prostate cancer--from "active surveillance" to robotic-assisted surgery].

Krome S.

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2011 Oct;136 Suppl 3:S86-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1292068. Epub 2011 Sep 28. German. No abstract available.

PMID:
21960373
14.

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: is the dust settling?

Menon M.

Eur Urol. 2011 Jan;59(1):7-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.10.032. Epub 2010 Oct 29. No abstract available.

PMID:
21035249
15.

The devil is in the details.

Eastham JA, Scardino PT.

Eur Urol. 2011 May;59(5):708-9; discussion 710-1. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.049. Epub 2011 Feb 4. No abstract available.

PMID:
21315503
16.

Re: Seong Cheol Kim, Cheryn Song, Wansuk Kim, et al. Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic. Eur Urol 2011;60:413-9.

Ennas M, Simonato A.

Eur Urol. 2012 Feb;61(2):e6; author reply e7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.030. Epub 2011 Oct 25. No abstract available.

PMID:
22036778
17.

The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Link BA, Nelson R, Josephson DY, Yoshida JS, Crocitto LE, Kawachi MH, Wilson TG.

J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):928-32. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.029. Epub 2008 Jul 17.

PMID:
18635217
18.

Is robot-assisted radical prostatectomy safer than other radical prostatectomy techniques?

Marberger M.

Eur Urol. 2011 May;59(5):699-700; discussion 701. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.02.030. Epub 2011 Feb 22. No abstract available.

PMID:
21353381
19.

Intrafascial dissection significantly increases positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence rates after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Mortezavi A, Hermanns T, Seifert HH, Wild PJ, Schmid DM, Sulser T, Eberli D.

Urol Int. 2012;89(1):17-24. doi: 10.1159/000339254. Epub 2012 Jun 27.

20.

Re: Giacomo Novara, Vincenzo Ficarra, Simone Mocellin, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62:382-404.

Picozzi SC, Ricci C, Carmignani L.

Eur Urol. 2013 Feb;63(2):e27-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.028. Epub 2012 Nov 16. No abstract available.

PMID:
23182552

Supplemental Content

Support Center