Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 256

1.

Working memory capacity and Stroop interference: global versus local indices of executive control.

Meier ME, Kane MJ.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May;39(3):748-59. doi: 10.1037/a0029200. Epub 2012 Jul 9.

PMID:
22774858
2.

The interactive effects of listwide control, item-based control, and working memory capacity on Stroop performance.

Hutchison KA.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jul;37(4):851-60. doi: 10.1037/a0023437.

PMID:
21517220
3.

Carving executive control at its joints: Working memory capacity predicts stimulus-stimulus, but not stimulus-response, conflict.

Meier ME, Kane MJ.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Nov;41(6):1849-72. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000147. Epub 2015 Jun 29.

4.

Goal-neglect links Stroop interference with working memory capacity.

Morey CC, Elliott EM, Wiggers J, Eaves SD, Shelton JT, Mall JT.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Oct;141(2):250-60. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.05.013. Epub 2012 Jun 30.

PMID:
22749714
5.

Working memory capacity predicts conflict-task performance.

Gulbinaite R, Johnson A.

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(7):1383-400. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.863374. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

PMID:
24199908
6.

Variation in working memory capacity and cognitive control: goal maintenance and microadjustments of control.

Unsworth N, Redick TS, Spillers GJ, Brewer GA.

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(2):326-55. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.597865. Epub 2011 Aug 18.

PMID:
21851149
7.

Drifting from slow to "D'oh!": working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors.

McVay JC, Kane MJ.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):525-49. doi: 10.1037/a0025896. Epub 2011 Oct 17.

8.

The working memory stroop effect: when internal representations clash with external stimuli.

Kiyonaga A, Egner T.

Psychol Sci. 2014 Aug;25(8):1619-29. doi: 10.1177/0956797614536739. Epub 2014 Jun 23.

9.

Cognitive control in context: working memory capacity and proactive control.

Redick TS.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Jan;145:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Nov 14.

PMID:
24240136
10.

Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference.

Kalanthroff E, Goldfarb L, Usher M, Henik A.

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(7):1356-67. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.741606. Epub 2012 Nov 19.

PMID:
23163896
11.

Working memory capacity affects the interference control of distractors at auditory gating.

Tsuchida Y, Katayama J, Murohashi H.

Neurosci Lett. 2012 May 10;516(1):62-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.057. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

PMID:
22484011
12.

Conflict adaptation: it is not what you expect.

Duthoo W, Notebaert W.

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(10):1993-2007. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.676655. Epub 2012 Jun 7.

PMID:
22670796
13.

Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level.

Bugg JM, Hutchison KA.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Apr;39(2):433-49. doi: 10.1037/a0029145. Epub 2012 Jul 30.

PMID:
22845037
14.

Going, going, gone? Proactive control prevents the congruency sequence effect from rapid decay.

Duthoo W, Abrahamse EL, Braem S, Notebaert W.

Psychol Res. 2014 Jul;78(4):483-93.

PMID:
24077774
15.

Age differences in stroop interference in working memory.

McCabe DP, Robertson CL, Smith AD.

J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005 Jul;27(5):633-44.

PMID:
16019640
16.

Training reveals the sources of Stroop and Flanker interference effects.

Chen A, Tang D, Chen X.

PLoS One. 2013 Oct 11;8(10):e76580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076580. eCollection 2013.

17.
18.

Working memory capacity and its relation to stroop interference and facilitation effects in individuals with mild cognitive impairment.

Sung JE, Kim JH, Jeong JH, Kang H.

Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 May;21(2):S166-78. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0101). Epub 2012 Feb 21.

PMID:
22355008
19.

The hot-hand fallacy in cognitive control: repetition expectancy modulates the congruency sequence effect.

Duthoo W, Wühr P, Notebaert W.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Aug;20(4):798-805. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0390-7.

PMID:
23371807
20.

Concurrent working memory task decreases the Stroop interference effect as indexed by the decreased theta oscillations.

Zhao Y, Tang D, Hu L, Zhang L, Hitchman G, Wang L, Chen A.

Neuroscience. 2014 Mar 14;262:92-106. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.12.052. Epub 2014 Jan 7.

PMID:
24406438

Supplemental Content

Support Center