Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 214

1.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE, Costello A, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Menon M, Mottrie A, Patel VR, Van der Poel H, Rosen RC, Tewari AK, Wilson TG, Zattoni F, Montorsi F.

Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):418-30. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.046. Epub 2012 Jun 1. Review.

PMID:
22749850
2.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Carroll PR, Costello A, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel VR, Stolzenburg JU, Van der Poel H, Wilson TG, Zattoni F, Mottrie A.

Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):405-17. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045. Epub 2012 Jun 1. Review.

PMID:
22749852
3.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S, Ahlering TE, Carroll PR, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Menon M, Patel VR, Shariat SF, Tewari AK, Van Poppel H, Zattoni F, Montorsi F, Mottrie A, Rosen RC, Wilson TG.

Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):382-404. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.047. Epub 2012 Jun 2. Review.

PMID:
22749851
4.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Costello A, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Shariat SF, Stolzenburg JU, Van Poppel H, Zattoni F, Montorsi F, Mottrie A, Wilson TG.

Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):431-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.044. Epub 2012 Jun 2. Review.

PMID:
22749853
5.

Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.

Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Guillonneau B, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel V, Rassweiler J, Van Poppel H.

Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1037-63. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.036. Epub 2009 Jan 25. Review.

PMID:
19185977
6.

Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic.

Kim SC, Song C, Kim W, Kang T, Park J, Jeong IG, Lee S, Cho YM, Ahn H.

Eur Urol. 2011 Sep;60(3):413-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 May 17.

PMID:
21612859
7.

Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes.

Kowalczyk KJ, Huang AC, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Yu HY, Ulmer WD, Kaplan JR, Patel S, Nguyen PL, Hu JC.

Eur Urol. 2011 Sep;60(3):536-47. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 May 17.

PMID:
21620561
8.

Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers.

Coelho RF, Rocco B, Patel MB, Orvieto MA, Chauhan S, Ficarra V, Melegari S, Palmer KJ, Patel VR.

J Endourol. 2010 Dec;24(12):2003-15. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0295. Epub 2010 Oct 13. Review.

9.

Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel.

Montorsi F, Wilson TG, Rosen RC, Ahlering TE, Artibani W, Carroll PR, Costello A, Eastham JA, Ficarra V, Guazzoni G, Menon M, Novara G, Patel VR, Stolzenburg JU, Van der Poel H, Van Poppel H, Mottrie A; Pasadena Consensus Panel.

Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):368-81. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.057. Epub 2012 Jun 7. Review.

PMID:
22763081
10.

Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.

Ludovico GM, Dachille G, Pagliarulo G, D'Elia C, Mondaini N, Gacci M, Detti B, Malossini G, Bartoletti R, Cai T.

Oncol Rep. 2013 Jun;29(6):2445-50. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2365. Epub 2013 Mar 26.

PMID:
23545628
11.

Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample.

Trinh QD, Sammon J, Sun M, Ravi P, Ghani KR, Bianchi M, Jeong W, Shariat SF, Hansen J, Schmitges J, Jeldres C, Rogers CG, Peabody JO, Montorsi F, Menon M, Karakiewicz PI.

Eur Urol. 2012 Apr;61(4):679-85. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.027. Epub 2011 Dec 22.

PMID:
22206800
12.

Comparison of perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes between standard laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Huang X, Wang L, Zheng X, Wang X.

Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1045-1060. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5125-1. Epub 2016 Jul 21. Review.

PMID:
27444830
13.

Retrograde versus antegrade nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better for achieving early functional recovery?

Ko YH, Coelho RF, Sivaraman A, Schatloff O, Chauhan S, Abdul-Muhsin HM, Carrion RJ, Palmer KJ, Cheon J, Patel VR.

Eur Urol. 2013 Jan;63(1):169-77. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.09.051. Epub 2012 Sep 28.

PMID:
23092543
15.

Randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Porpiglia F, Morra I, Lucci Chiarissi M, Manfredi M, Mele F, Grande S, Ragni F, Poggio M, Fiori C.

Eur Urol. 2013 Apr;63(4):606-14. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Jul 20.

PMID:
22840353
16.

[Comparison of initial results with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy].

Otsuki H, Kuwahara Y, Nakamura K, Tsukamoto T.

Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2013 Sep;104(5):635-43. Japanese.

PMID:
24187850
17.

Optimal strategy for penile rehabilitation after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy based on preoperative erectile function.

Basal S, Wambi C, Acikel C, Gupta M, Badani K.

BJU Int. 2013 Apr;111(4):658-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11487.x. Epub 2012 Nov 27.

18.

Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Kumar A, Tandon S, Samavedi S, Mouraviev V, Bates AS, Patel VR.

J Robot Surg. 2016 Sep;10(3):187-200. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0607-7. Epub 2016 Jun 1. Review.

PMID:
27251473
19.

Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.

Ilic D, Evans SM, Allan CA, Jung JH, Murphy D, Frydenberg M.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9:CD009625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2. Review.

PMID:
28895658
20.

Robotic vs. Retropubic radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer: A systematic review and an meta-analysis update.

Tang K, Jiang K, Chen H, Chen Z, Xu H, Ye Z.

Oncotarget. 2017 May 9;8(19):32237-32257. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13332. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center