Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 132

1.

Impact of hemolysis during sample collection: how different is drug concentration in hemolyzed plasma from that of normal plasma?

Tan A, Gagné S, Lévesque IA, Lachance S, Boudreau N, Lévesque A.

J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2012 Jul 15;901:79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jun 12.

PMID:
22748717
2.

Strategies for dealing with hemolyzed samples in regulated LC-MS/MS bioanalysis.

Tang D, Thomas E.

Bioanalysis. 2012 Nov;4(22):2715-24. doi: 10.4155/bio.12.229.

PMID:
23210654
3.

Impact of sample hemolysis on drug stability in regulated bioanalysis.

Bérubé ER, Taillon MP, Furtado M, Garofolo F.

Bioanalysis. 2011 Sep;3(18):2097-105. doi: 10.4155/bio.11.190.

PMID:
21942520
4.
5.

Exploring the feasibility of using the DBS technique for metabolite radioprofiling.

Wang L, Zeng Z, Emmons G.

Bioanalysis. 2010 Aug;2(8):1365-71. doi: 10.4155/bio.10.100.

PMID:
21083337
6.

Individualized correction of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) measurement in hemolyzed serum samples.

Tolan NV, Vidal-Folch N, Algeciras-Schimnich A, Singh RJ, Grebe SK.

Clin Chim Acta. 2013 Sep 23;424:216-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.06.009. Epub 2013 Jun 15.

PMID:
23778024
7.

Hemolysis of coagulation specimens: a comparative study of intravenous draw methods.

Stauss M, Sherman B, Pugh L, Parone D, Looby-Rodriguez K, Bell A, Reed CR.

J Emerg Nurs. 2012 Jan;38(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2010.08.011. Epub 2010 Oct 2.

PMID:
22226132
8.
9.

Effects of hemolysis interferences on routine biochemistry parameters.

Koseoglu M, Hur A, Atay A, Cuhadar S.

Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2011;21(1):79-85.

10.

Hemolyzed specimens: a major challenge for emergency departments and clinical laboratories.

Lippi G, Plebani M, Di Somma S, Cervellin G.

Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2011 May-Jun;48(3):143-53. doi: 10.3109/10408363.2011.600228. Review.

PMID:
21875312
11.
12.

The Impact of Hemolysis on Cell-Free microRNA Biomarkers.

Kirschner MB, Edelman JJ, Kao SC, Vallely MP, van Zandwijk N, Reid G.

Front Genet. 2013 May 24;4:94. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2013.00094. eCollection 2013.

13.

Plasma protective effect on red blood cells exposed to mechanical stress.

Kameneva MV, Antaki JF, Yeleswarapu KK, Watach MJ, Griffith BP, Borovetz HS.

ASAIO J. 1997 Sep-Oct;43(5):M571-5.

PMID:
9360109
14.

Effect of in vitro hemolysis on 25 common biochemical tests.

Yücel D, Dalva K.

Clin Chem. 1992 Apr;38(4):575-7.

15.

Identification of spurious hemolysis in anticoagulated blood with Sysmex XE-2100 and Siemens Advia 2120.

Lippi G, Pipitone S, Gennari D, Franchini M.

Clin Lab. 2012;58(7-8):801-4.

PMID:
22997981
16.

Implementing DBS methodology for the determination of Compound A in monkey blood: GLP method validation and investigation of the impact of blood spreading on performance.

Fan L, Lee J, Hall J, Tolentino EJ, Wu H, El-Shourbagy T.

Bioanalysis. 2011 Jun;3(11):1241-52. doi: 10.4155/bio.11.97.

PMID:
21649500
17.

The suitability of hemolyzed specimens for compatibility testing using automated technology.

Laga A, Cheves T, Maroto S, Coutts M, Sweeney J.

Transfusion. 2008 Aug;48(8):1713-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01741.x. Epub 2008 May 14.

PMID:
18482191
18.

The hemolysis kinetics of psoriatic red blood cells.

Górnicki A.

Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2008 Sep-Oct;41(2):154-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2008.04.003. Epub 2008 Jun 3.

PMID:
18511312
19.

RBC storage for 11 weeks.

Hess JR, Rugg N, Gormas JK, Knapp AD, Hill HR, Oliver CK, Lippert LE, Silberstein EB, Greenwalt TJ.

Transfusion. 2001 Dec;41(12):1586-90.

PMID:
11778076
20.

The degree of acceptability of swine blood values at increasing levels of hemolysis evaluated through visual inspection versus automated quantification.

Di Martino G, Stefani AL, Lippi G, Gagliazzo L, McCormick W, Gabai G, Bonfanti L.

J Vet Diagn Invest. 2015 May;27(3):306-12. doi: 10.1177/1040638715585155.

PMID:
26038480

Supplemental Content

Support Center