Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 62

1.

Is confidence of mammographic assessment a good predictor of accuracy?

Geller BM, Bogart A, Carney PA, Elmore JG, Monsees BS, Miglioretti DL.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jul;199(1):W134-41. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7701.

2.

Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy.

Elmore JG, Jackson SL, Abraham L, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K, Onega T, Rosenberg RD, Sickles EA, Buist DS.

Radiology. 2009 Dec;253(3):641-51. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2533082308. Epub 2009 Oct 28.

3.

The influence of mammographic technologists on radiologists' ability to interpret screening mammograms in community practice.

Henderson LM, Benefield T, Marsh MW, Schroeder BF, Durham DD, Yankaskas BC, Bowling JM.

Acad Radiol. 2015 Mar;22(3):278-89. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.09.013. Epub 2014 Nov 27.

4.

Mammographic interpretation: radiologists' ability to accurately estimate their performance and compare it with that of their peers.

Cook AJ, Elmore JG, Zhu W, Jackson SL, Carney PA, Flowers C, Onega T, Geller B, Rosenberg RD, Miglioretti DL.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Sep;199(3):695-702. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7402.

5.

Association between radiologists' experience and accuracy in interpreting screening mammograms.

Molins E, Macià F, Ferrer F, Maristany MT, Castells X.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Apr 25;8:91. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-91.

6.

Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists.

Barlow WE, Chi C, Carney PA, Taplin SH, D'Orsi C, Cutter G, Hendrick RE, Elmore JG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Dec 15;96(24):1840-50.

7.

Radiologist interpretive volume and breast cancer screening accuracy in a Canadian organized screening program.

Théberge I, Chang SL, Vandal N, Daigle JM, Guertin MH, Pelletier E, Brisson J.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Mar;106(3):djt461. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt461. Epub 2014 Mar 5.

PMID:
24598715
8.

Do mammographic technologists affect radiologists' diagnostic mammography interpretative performance?

Henderson LM, Benefield T, Bowling JM, Durham DD, Marsh MW, Schroeder BF, Yankaskas BC.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Apr;204(4):903-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12903.

9.

Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation.

Beam CA, Conant EF, Sickles EA.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Feb 19;95(4):282-90.

PMID:
12591984
10.

Identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria for screening mammography.

Carney PA, Sickles EA, Monsees BS, Bassett LW, Brenner RJ, Feig SA, Smith RA, Rosenberg RD, Bogart TA, Browning S, Barry JW, Kelly MM, Tran KA, Miglioretti DL.

Radiology. 2010 May;255(2):354-61. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091636.

11.

Association between time spent interpreting, level of confidence, and accuracy of screening mammography.

Carney PA, Bogart TA, Geller BM, Haneuse S, Kerlikowske K, Buist DS, Smith R, Rosenberg R, Yankaskas BC, Onega T, Miglioretti DL.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Apr;198(4):970-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.6988.

12.

Physician workload in mammography.

Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Rosenberg R, Reid RJ, Taplin SH, Geller BM, Kerlikowske K; National Institutes of Health Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium..

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Feb;190(2):526-32. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2500.

PMID:
18212242
13.

Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force [Internet].

Melnikow J, Fenton JJ, Whitlock EP, Miglioretti DL, Weyrich MS, Thompson JH, Shah K.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jan.

14.

Reactions to uncertainty and the accuracy of diagnostic mammography.

Carney PA, Yi JP, Abraham LA, Miglioretti DL, Aiello EJ, Gerrity MS, Reisch L, Berns EA, Sickles EA, Elmore JG.

J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Feb;22(2):234-41.

15.

Mammography facility characteristics associated with interpretive accuracy of screening mammography.

Taplin S, Abraham L, Barlow WE, Fenton JJ, Berns EA, Carney PA, Cutter GR, Sickles EA, Carl D, Elmore JG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Jun 18;100(12):876-87. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn172. Epub 2008 Jun 10.

16.

Decreased accuracy in interpretation of community-based screening mammography for women with multiple clinical risk factors.

Cook AJ, Elmore JG, Miglioretti DL, Sickles EA, Aiello Bowles EJ, Cutter GR, Carney PA.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;63(4):441-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.008. Epub 2009 Sep 9.

17.

Are radiologists' goals for mammography accuracy consistent with published recommendations?

Jackson SL, Cook AJ, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA, Geller BM, Onega T, Rosenberg RD, Brenner RJ, Elmore JG.

Acad Radiol. 2012 Mar;19(3):289-95. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.10.013. Epub 2011 Nov 30.

18.

Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists.

Sickles EA, Wolverton DE, Dee KE.

Radiology. 2002 Sep;224(3):861-9.

PMID:
12202726
19.

Improving the accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships.

Esserman L, Cowley H, Eberle C, Kirkpatrick A, Chang S, Berbaum K, Gale A.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Mar 6;94(5):369-75.

PMID:
11880475
20.

Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography.

Elmore JG, Taplin SH, Barlow WE, Cutter GR, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, Abraham LA, Fosse JS, Carney PA.

Radiology. 2005 Jul;236(1):37-46.

Supplemental Content

Support Center