Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 140

1.

Chromatic aberration, accommodation, and color preference in asthenopia.

Drew SA, Borsting E, Stark LR, Chase C.

Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Jul;89(7):E1059-67. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31825da2f7.

PMID:
22733104
2.

Accommodative response under monocular and binocular conditions as a function of phoria in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.

Momeni-Moghaddam H, Goss DA, Sobhani M.

Clin Exp Optom. 2014 Jan;97(1):36-42. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12074. Epub 2013 Jun 27.

3.

Visual discomfort and objective measures of static accommodation.

Chase C, Tosha C, Borsting E, Ridder WH 3rd.

Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Jul;86(7):883-9. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181ae1b7c.

PMID:
19521268
4.

Contact lenses vs spectacles in myopes: is there any difference in accommodative and binocular function?

Jiménez R, Martínez-Almeida L, Salas C, Ortíz C.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Jun;249(6):925-35. doi: 10.1007/s00417-010-1570-z. Epub 2010 Nov 23.

PMID:
21104269
5.

Potential preventive effects of a new visual intervention for accommodative insufficiency and asthenopia due to sustained near task.

Iwasaki T, Nagata T, Tawara A.

Ophthalmologica. 2012;228(3):181-7. Epub 2012 Jan 19.

PMID:
22261636
6.
7.

Effect of cumulative nearwork on accommodative facility and asthenopia.

Iribarren R, Fornaciari A, Hung GK.

Int Ophthalmol. 2001;24(4):205-12.

PMID:
12678397
8.

Accommodation response and visual discomfort.

Tosha C, Borsting E, Ridder WH 3rd, Chase C.

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009 Nov;29(6):625-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00687.x.

PMID:
19821926
9.

Target spatial frequency determines the response to conflicting defocus- and convergence-driven accommodative stimuli.

Okada Y, Ukai K, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B, Iijima A, Bando T.

Vision Res. 2006 Feb;46(4):475-84. Epub 2005 Sep 29.

10.

[Effects of visual optical stimuli for accommodation-convergence system on asthenopia].

Iwasaki T, Tawara A, Miyake N.

Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2006 Jan;110(1):5-12. Japanese.

PMID:
16491867
11.

Accommodative amplitude required for sustained near work.

Wolffsohn JS, Sheppard AL, Vakani S, Davies LN.

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011 Sep;31(5):480-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00847.x. Epub 2011 Apr 28.

PMID:
21535069
12.

Small amounts of chromatic aberration influence dynamic accommodation.

Kruger PB, Nowbotsing S, Aggarwala KR, Mathews S.

Optom Vis Sci. 1995 Sep;72(9):656-66.

PMID:
8532307
13.
14.

Accommodation and the relationship to subjective symptoms with near work for young school children.

Sterner B, Gellerstedt M, Sjöström A.

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006 Mar;26(2):148-55.

PMID:
16460315
15.

Accommodation to static chromatic simulations of blurred retinal images.

Lee JH, Stark LR, Cohen S, Kruger PB.

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1999 May;19(3):223-35.

PMID:
10627841
16.
17.

Ophthalmological factors influencing visual asthenopia as a result of viewing 3D displays.

Wee SW, Moon NJ, Lee WK, Jeon S.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Nov;96(11):1391-4. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-301690. Epub 2012 Sep 5.

PMID:
22952400
18.

Accommodation to wavefront vergence and chromatic aberration.

Wang Y, Kruger PB, Li JS, Lin PL, Stark LR.

Optom Vis Sci. 2011 May;88(5):593-600. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182112d99.

19.

Role of ocular aberrations in dynamic accommodation control.

Chin SS, Hampson KM, Mallen E.

Clin Exp Optom. 2009 May;92(3):227-37.

PMID:
19462504
20.

Longitudinal study of visual discomfort symptoms in college students.

Borsting E, Chase C, Tosha C, Ridder WH 3rd.

Optom Vis Sci. 2008 Oct;85(10):992-8. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31818883cd.

PMID:
18832978

Supplemental Content

Support Center