Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 269

2.

Visual perception of force: comment on White (2012).

Hubbard TL.

Psychol Bull. 2012 Jul;138(4):616-23; discussion 624-7. doi: 10.1037/a0028539.

PMID:
22730923
3.

Perception of forces exerted by objects in collision events.

White PA.

Psychol Rev. 2009 Jul;116(3):580-601. doi: 10.1037/a0016337.

PMID:
19618988
4.

Judgments about forces in described interactions between objects.

White PA.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jul;37(4):979-93. doi: 10.1037/a0023258.

PMID:
21480755
5.

Transfer of object category knowledge across visual and haptic modalities: experimental and computational studies.

Yildirim I, Jacobs RA.

Cognition. 2013 Feb;126(2):135-48. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.08.005. Epub 2012 Oct 25.

PMID:
23102553
7.

Cognitive, perceptual and action-oriented representations of falling objects.

Zago M, Lacquaniti F.

Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(2):178-88. Epub 2005 Jan 7. Review.

PMID:
15707903
8.

Visual influence on haptic torque perception.

Xu Y, O'Keefe S, Suzuki S, Franconeri SL.

Perception. 2012;41(7):862-70.

9.

The impetus theory in judgments about object motion: a new perspective.

White PA.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Dec;19(6):1007-28. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0302-2. Review.

PMID:
22851410
10.

The role of activity in visual impressions of causality.

White PA.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 Sep-Oct;123(1-2):166-85. Epub 2006 Aug 17.

PMID:
16919228
11.

Toward a causal realist account of causal understanding.

White PA.

Am J Psychol. 1999 Winter;112(4):605-42. Review.

PMID:
10696269
12.

Remapping motion across modalities: tactile rotations influence visual motion judgments.

Butz MV, Thomaschke R, Linhardt MJ, Herbort O.

Exp Brain Res. 2010 Nov;207(1-2):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2420-2. Epub 2010 Sep 29.

PMID:
20878396
13.

Stronger discounting of external cause by action in human adults: evidence for an action-based hypothesis of visual collision perception.

Mitsumatsu H.

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Feb;142(1):101-18. doi: 10.1037/a0028570. Epub 2012 May 21.

PMID:
22612772
14.

Static images of novel, moveable objects learned through touch activate visual area hMT+.

Chan JS, Simões-Franklin C, Garavan H, Newell FN.

Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 15;49(2):1708-16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.068. Epub 2009 Oct 6.

PMID:
19815082
15.

Similarity and categorization: from vision to touch.

Gaissert N, Bülthoff HH, Wallraven C.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Sep;138(1):219-30. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.06.007. Epub 2011 Jul 14.

PMID:
21752344
16.

The influence of visual motion on interceptive actions and perception.

Marinovic W, Plooy AM, Arnold DH.

Vision Res. 2012 May 1;60:73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.03.010. Epub 2012 Mar 29.

17.

Tactile flow explains haptic counterparts of common visual illusions.

Bicchi A, Scilingo EP, Ricciardi E, Pietrini P.

Brain Res Bull. 2008 Apr 15;75(6):737-41. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.01.011. Epub 2008 Feb 11.

PMID:
18394519
18.

Feature binding in perceptual priming and in episodic object recognition: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Groh-Bordin C, Zimmer HD, Mecklinger A.

Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Aug;24(3):556-67. Epub 2005 Apr 13.

PMID:
16099366
19.

Physics embedded in visual perception of three-dimensional shape from motion.

Gilroy LA, Blake R.

Nat Neurosci. 2004 Sep;7(9):921-2. Epub 2004 Aug 8.

PMID:
15300254
20.

Visual interactions in the path of apparent motion.

Yantis S, Nakama T.

Nat Neurosci. 1998 Oct;1(6):508-12.

PMID:
10196549
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk