Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 286

1.

Evaluation of three enzyme immunoassays and a loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Bruins MJ, Verbeek E, Wallinga JA, Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet LE, Kuijper EJ, Bloembergen P.

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Nov;31(11):3035-9. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1658-y. Epub 2012 Jun 17.

PMID:
22706512
2.

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification compared to real-time PCR and enzyme immunoassay for toxigenic Clostridium difficile detection.

Boyanton BL Jr, Sural P, Loomis CR, Pesta C, Gonzalez-Krellwitz L, Robinson-Dunn B, Riska P.

J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Mar;50(3):640-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01014-11. Epub 2011 Dec 21.

3.
4.

Evaluation of tcdB real-time PCR in a three-step diagnostic algorithm for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.

Larson AM, Fung AM, Fang FC.

J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Jan;48(1):124-30. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00734-09. Epub 2009 Nov 18.

5.

Superiority of the DNA amplification assay for the diagnosis of C. difficile infection: a clinical comparison of fecal tests.

Barkin JA, Nandi N, Miller N, Grace A, Barkin JS, Sussman DA.

Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Oct;57(10):2592-9. Epub 2012 May 11.

PMID:
22576711
6.

Two-step glutamate dehydrogenase antigen real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.

Goldenberg SD, Cliff PR, Smith S, Milner M, French GL.

J Hosp Infect. 2010 Jan;74(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.08.014. Epub 2009 Nov 8.

PMID:
19900734
7.
8.

Performance of Clostridium difficile toxin enzyme immunoassay and nucleic acid amplification tests stratified by patient disease severity.

Humphries RM, Uslan DZ, Rubin Z.

J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Mar;51(3):869-73. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02970-12. Epub 2012 Dec 26.

9.

Evaluation of the illumigene C. difficile assay for toxigenic Clostridium difficile detection: a prospective study of 302 consecutive clinical fecal samples.

Hong G, Park KS, Ki CS, Lee NY.

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Nov;80(3):177-80. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Sep 2.

PMID:
25241189
10.
11.

A new rapid method for Clostridium difficile DNA extraction and detection in stool: toward point-of-care diagnostic testing.

Freifeld AG, Simonsen KA, Booth CS, Zhao X, Whitney SE, Karre T, Iwen PC, Viljoen HJ.

J Mol Diagn. 2012 May-Jun;14(3):274-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Mar 5.

PMID:
22402170
12.

[Experience with laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile].

Bareková L, Zálabská E, Hanovcová I.

Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek. 2013 Sep;19(3):91-5. Czech.

PMID:
24579451
13.

Comparison of eight commercial enzyme immunoassays for the detection of Clostridium difficile from stool samples and effect of strain type.

René P, Frenette CP, Schiller I, Dendukuri N, Brassard P, Fenn S, Loo VG.

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 May;73(1):94-6. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Mar 15.

PMID:
22424900
14.

Evaluation of a simultaneous detection kit for the glutamate dehydrogenase antigen and toxin A/B in feces for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Kawada M, Annaka M, Kato H, Shibasaki S, Hikosaka K, Mizuno H, Masuda Y, Inamatsu T.

J Infect Chemother. 2011 Dec;17(6):807-11. doi: 10.1007/s10156-011-0267-5. Epub 2011 Jul 2.

PMID:
21725661
15.

Evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections.

Lalande V, Barrault L, Wadel S, Eckert C, Petit JC, Barbut F.

J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Jul;49(7):2714-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01835-10. Epub 2011 Apr 27.

16.

Evaluation of an algorithmic approach in comparison with the Illumigene assay for laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Walkty A, Lagacé-Wiens PR, Manickam K, Adam H, Pieroni P, Hoban D, Karlowsky JA, Alfa M.

J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Apr;51(4):1152-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03203-12. Epub 2013 Jan 30.

17.

Comparison of real-time PCR for detection of the tcdC gene with four toxin immunoassays and culture in diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Sloan LM, Duresko BJ, Gustafson DR, Rosenblatt JE.

J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Jun;46(6):1996-2001. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00032-08. Epub 2008 Apr 23.

18.

Impact of strain type on detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of molecular diagnostic and enzyme immunoassay approaches.

Tenover FC, Novak-Weekley S, Woods CW, Peterson LR, Davis T, Schreckenberger P, Fang FC, Dascal A, Gerding DN, Nomura JH, Goering RV, Akerlund T, Weissfeld AS, Baron EJ, Wong E, Marlowe EM, Whitmore J, Persing DH.

J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Oct;48(10):3719-24. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00427-10. Epub 2010 Aug 11.

19.

Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of the cell culture neutralization, Xpert C. difficile, Xpert C. difficile/Epi, and Illumigene C. difficile assays.

Pancholi P, Kelly C, Raczkowski M, Balada-Llasat JM.

J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Apr;50(4):1331-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06597-11. Epub 2012 Jan 25.

20.

Comparison of antigen and two molecular methods for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins.

Ylisiurua P, Koskela M, Vainio O, Tuokko H.

Scand J Infect Dis. 2013 Jan;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2012.708780. Epub 2012 Sep 21.

PMID:
22998479

Supplemental Content

Support Center