Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 82

1.

Abdominal Colpopexy: Comparison of Endoscopic Surgical Strategies (ACCESS).

Mueller ER, Kenton K, Tarnay C, Brubaker L, Rosenman A, Smith B, Stroupe K, Bresee C, Pantuck A, Schulam P, Anger JT.

Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Sep;33(5):1011-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.05.007. Epub 2012 May 27.

2.

Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial.

Mueller ER, Kenton K, Anger JT, Bresee C, Tarnay C.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Sep-Oct;23(6):917-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 12.

3.

A comparison of costs for abdominal, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted sacral colpopexy.

Patel M, O'Sullivan D, Tulikangas PK.

Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Feb;20(2):223-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0744-2. Epub 2008 Oct 16.

PMID:
18923803
4.

Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial.

Anger JT, Mueller ER, Tarnay C, Smith B, Stroupe K, Rosenman A, Brubaker L, Bresee C, Kenton K.

Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;123(1):5-12. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000006. Erratum in: Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;124(1):165.

5.

Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.

Judd JP, Siddiqui NY, Barnett JC, Visco AG, Havrilesky LJ, Wu JM.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Jul-Aug;17(4):493-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.03.011.

PMID:
20621010
6.

Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.

Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Chen CC, Barber MD.

Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;118(5):1005-13. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318231537c.

PMID:
21979458
7.

Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Serati M, Bogani G, Sorice P, Braga A, Torella M, Salvatore S, Uccella S, Cromi A, Ghezzi F.

Eur Urol. 2014 Aug;66(2):303-18. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.053. Epub 2014 Mar 6. Review.

PMID:
24631406
8.

Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review.

Callewaert G, Bosteels J, Housmans S, Verguts J, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Van der Aa F, De Ridder D, Vergote I, Deprest J.

Gynecol Surg. 2016;13:115-123. Epub 2016 Jan 26. Review.

9.

Robotic sacrocolpopexy: how does it compare with other prolapse repair techniques?

Linder BJ, Elliott DS.

Curr Urol Rep. 2013 Jun;14(3):235-9. doi: 10.1007/s11934-012-0299-0. Review.

PMID:
23296693
10.

Review of extraperitoneal sacrocolpopexy as a technique for advanced uterine and vault prolapse.

Onol FF, Onol SY.

Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Aug;24(4):253-8. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328354ca7d. Review.

PMID:
22614674
11.

Prospective comparison of short-term functional outcomes obtained after pure laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Seror J, Yates DR, Seringe E, Vaessen C, Bitker MO, Chartier-Kastler E, RouprĂȘt M.

World J Urol. 2012 Jun;30(3):393-8. doi: 10.1007/s00345-011-0748-2. Epub 2011 Aug 20.

PMID:
21858540
12.

Detailed Cost Analysis of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Compared to Transvaginal Mesh Repair.

Ehlert MJ, Gupta P, Park J, Sirls LT.

Urology. 2016 Nov;97:86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.05.072. Epub 2016 Aug 2.

PMID:
27496298
13.

[Management of vaginal vault prolapse repair with robotically-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy].

Elliott DS, Chow GK.

Ann Urol (Paris). 2007 Feb;41(1):31-6. French.

PMID:
17338498
15.

Single-port laparoscopic abdominal sacral colpopexy: initial experience and comparative outcomes.

White WM, Goel RK, Swartz MA, Moore C, Rackley RR, Kaouk JH.

Urology. 2009 Nov;74(5):1008-12. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.02.086. Epub 2009 Aug 29.

PMID:
19716594
16.

Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution.

Ploumidis A, Spinoit AF, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, Gan M, Ficarra V, Volpe A, Mottrie A.

Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.054. Epub 2013 Jun 11.

PMID:
23806518
17.

Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.

Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, Schaer G.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 May;150(1):92-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Mar 5.

PMID:
20207063
18.

A comparative direct cost analysis of pediatric urologic robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery: could robot-assisted surgery be less expensive?

Rowe CK, Pierce MW, Tecci KC, Houck CS, Mandell J, Retik AB, Nguyen HT.

J Endourol. 2012 Jul;26(7):871-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0584. Epub 2012 Mar 14.

PMID:
22283146
19.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.

Advincula AP, Xu X, Goudeau S 4th, Ransom SB.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):698-705.

PMID:
17980329
20.

Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review.

Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CM, Adams EJ, Hagen S.

Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(1):3-12. Review.

PMID:
18092333

Supplemental Content

Support Center