Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 127

1.

The roles of featural and configural face processing in snap judgments of sexual orientation.

Tabak JA, Zayas V.

PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036671. Epub 2012 May 16.

2.

Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.

Tanaka JW, Kaiser MD, Hagen S, Pierce LJ.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 May;76(4):1000-14. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0628-0.

PMID:
24477773
3.
4.

Featural versus configural face processing in a rare genetic disorder: Williams syndrome.

Isaac L, Lincoln A.

J Intellect Disabil Res. 2011 Nov;55(11):1034-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01426.x. Epub 2011 May 10.

PMID:
21554469
5.

Perceptual separability of featural and configural information in congenital prosopagnosia.

Kimchi R, Behrmann M, Avidan G, Amishav R.

Cogn Neuropsychol. 2012;29(5-6):447-63. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2012.752723.

PMID:
23428081
6.

Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces.

Leder H, Candrian G, Huber O, Bruce V.

Perception. 2001;30(1):73-83.

PMID:
11257979
7.

Does face inversion qualitatively change face processing: an eye movement study using a face change detection task.

Xu B, Tanaka JW.

J Vis. 2013 Feb 18;13(2). pii: 22. doi: 10.1167/13.2.22.

PMID:
23420421
8.

Emotion recognition: the role of featural and configural face information.

Bombari D, Schmid PC, Schmid Mast M, Birri S, Mast FW, Lobmaier JS.

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(12):2426-42. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.789065. Epub 2013 May 16.

PMID:
23679155
9.

Double dissociation of configural and featural face processing on P1 and P2 components as a function of spatial attention.

Wang H, Guo S, Fu S.

Psychophysiology. 2016 Aug;53(8):1165-73. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12669. Epub 2016 May 11.

PMID:
27167853
10.

Effects of configural processing on the perceptual spatial resolution for face features.

Namdar G, Avidan G, Ganel T.

Cortex. 2015 Nov;72:115-123. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 Apr 25.

PMID:
25998751
11.

Configural processing and perceptions of head tilt.

Collishaw SM, Hole GJ, Schwaninger A.

Perception. 2005;34(2):163-8.

PMID:
15832567
12.

The first 100 milliseconds of a face: on the microgenesis of early face processing.

Carbon CC.

Percept Mot Skills. 2011 Dec;113(3):859-74.

PMID:
22403930
13.

Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.

Keyes H.

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(4):760-72. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.636822. Epub 2012 Jan 17.

PMID:
22248095
14.
15.

Processing of featural and configural aspects of faces is lateralized in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a TMS study.

Renzi C, Schiavi S, Carbon CC, Vecchi T, Silvanto J, Cattaneo Z.

Neuroimage. 2013 Jul 1;74:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.015. Epub 2013 Feb 20.

PMID:
23435211
16.

Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing.

Mondloch CJ, Le Grand R, Maurer D.

Perception. 2002;31(5):553-66.

PMID:
12044096
17.
18.

Featural, configural, and holistic face-processing strategies evoke different scan patterns.

Bombari D, Mast FW, Lobmaier JS.

Perception. 2009;38(10):1508-21.

PMID:
19950482
19.

The respective role of low and high spatial frequencies in supporting configural and featural processing of faces.

Goffaux V, Hault B, Michel C, Vuong QC, Rossion B.

Perception. 2005;34(1):77-86.

PMID:
15773608
20.

The inversion effect on gaze perception reflects processing of component information.

Schwaninger A, Lobmaier JS, Fischer MH.

Exp Brain Res. 2005 Nov;167(1):49-55. Epub 2005 Oct 29.

PMID:
16082532

Supplemental Content

Support Center