Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 107

1.

Team task analysis: differentiating between tasks using team relatedness and team workflow as metrics of team task interdependence.

Arthur W Jr, Glaze RM, Bhupatkar A, Villado AJ, Bennett W Jr, Rowe LJ.

Hum Factors. 2012 Apr;54(2):277-95.

PMID:
22624293
2.

Team task analysis: identifying tasks and jobs that are team based.

Arthur W Jr, Edwards BD, Bell ST, Villado AJ, Bennett W Jr.

Hum Factors. 2005 Fall;47(3):654-69.

PMID:
16435704
3.

Effects of automation of information-processing functions on teamwork.

Wright MC, Kaber DB.

Hum Factors. 2005 Spring;47(1):50-66.

PMID:
15960086
4.

Pilots' visual scan patterns and situation awareness in flight operations.

Yu CS, Wang EM, Li WC, Braithwaite G.

Aviat Space Environ Med. 2014 Jul;85(7):708-14.

PMID:
25022158
5.

Team effectiveness: beyond skills and cognitive ability.

Neuman GA, Wright J.

J Appl Psychol. 1999 Jun;84(3):376-89.

PMID:
10380418
6.

Computerized Tests of Team Performance and Crew Coordination Suitable for Military/Aviation Settings.

Lawson BD, Britt TW, Kelley AM, Athy JR, Legan SM.

Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2017 Aug 1;88(8):722-729. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.4786.2017. Review.

PMID:
28720181
7.

Analyzing team performance: in the eye of the beholder?

Baker DP, Salas E.

Mil Psychol. 1996;8(3):235-45.

PMID:
11540407
8.
9.

Team performance in networked supervisory control of unmanned air vehicles: effects of automation, working memory, and communication content.

McKendrick R, Shaw T, de Visser E, Saqer H, Kidwell B, Parasuraman R.

Hum Factors. 2014 May;56(3):463-75.

PMID:
24930169
10.

Implicit Coordination Strategies for Effective Team Communication.

Butchibabu A, Sparano-Huiban C, Sonenberg L, Shah J.

Hum Factors. 2016 Jun;58(4):595-610. doi: 10.1177/0018720816639712. Epub 2016 Apr 25.

PMID:
27113991
11.
12.

An examination of organizational and team commitment in a self-directed team environment.

Bishop JW, Scott KD.

J Appl Psychol. 2000 Jun;85(3):439-50.

PMID:
10900817
13.

Oculographic assessment of workload influence on flight performance.

Szczechura J, Terelak JF, Kobos Z, Pinkowski J.

Int J Aviat Psychol. 1998;8(2):157-76.

PMID:
11541530
14.

Effects of workload preview on task scheduling during simulated instrument flight.

Andre AD, Heers ST, Cashion PA.

Int J Aviat Psychol. 1995;5(1):5-23.

PMID:
11541496
15.
16.

Evaluation of the Display of Cognitive State Feedback to Drive Adaptive Task Sharing.

Dorneich MC, Passinger B, Hamblin C, Keinrath C, VaĊĦek J, Whitlow SD, Beekhuyzen M.

Front Neurosci. 2017 Mar 28;11:144. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00144. eCollection 2017.

17.

Structural interdependence in teams: An integrative framework and meta-analysis.

Courtright SH, Thurgood GR, Stewart GL, Pierotti AJ.

J Appl Psychol. 2015 Nov;100(6):1825-46. doi: 10.1037/apl0000027. Epub 2015 May 4.

PMID:
25938722
18.

Domain-Specific Interference Tests on Navigational Working Memory in Military Pilots.

Verde P, Boccia M, Colangeli S, Barbetti S, Nori R, Ferlazzo F, Piccolo F, Vitalone R, Lucertini E, Piccardi L.

Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2016 Jun;87(6):528-33. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.4521.2016.

PMID:
27208675
19.

Mission control of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles: a workload analysis.

Dixon SR, Wickens CD, Chang D.

Hum Factors. 2005 Fall;47(3):479-87.

PMID:
16435690
20.

Fighter pilots' heart rate, heart rate variation and performance during an instrument flight rules proficiency test.

Mansikka H, Virtanen K, Harris D, Simola P.

Appl Ergon. 2016 Sep;56:213-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 22.

PMID:
27109324

Supplemental Content

Support Center