Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 85

1.
2.

Quality evaluation of microscopy and scanned histological images for diagnostic purposes.

Redondo R, Bueno G, Cristóbal G, Vidal J, Déniz O, García-Rojo M, Murillo C, Relea F, González J.

Micron. 2012 Feb;43(2-3):334-43. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2011.09.010. Epub 2011 Oct 6.

PMID:
22099388
3.

Performance evaluation of an 85-cm-bore X-ray computed tomography scanner designed for radiation oncology and comparison with current diagnostic CT scanners.

Garcia-Ramirez JL, Mutic S, Dempsey JF, Low DA, Purdy JA.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Mar 15;52(4):1123-31.

PMID:
11958910
4.
5.

Comparative evaluation of laser-based microarray scanners.

Ramdas L, Wang J, Hu L, Cogdell D, Taylor E, Zhang W.

Biotechniques. 2001 Sep;31(3):546, 548, 550, passim.

PMID:
11570499
6.

Quality evaluation of ultrasound imaging in the carotid artery based on normalization and speckle reduction filtering.

Loizou CP, Pattichis CS, Pantziaris M, Tyllis T, Nicolaides A.

Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006 May;44(5):414-26. Epub 2006 Apr 11.

PMID:
16937183
7.

Ex vivo measurement reliability using two different cbct scanners for orthodontic purposes.

Dalessandri D, Bracco P, Paganelli C, Hernandez Soler V, Martin C.

Int J Med Robot. 2012 Jun;8(2):230-42. doi: 10.1002/rcs.458. Epub 2012 Feb 7.

PMID:
22315209
8.

Morphometric analysis of the corneal endothelium with three different specular microscopes.

Landesz M, Kamps A, Slart R, Siertsema JV, van Rij G.

Doc Ophthalmol. 1995;90(1):15-28.

PMID:
8549239
9.

Virtual laboratory manual for microscopic anatomy.

Michaels JE, Allred K, Bruns C, Lim W, Lowrie DJ Jr, Hedgren W.

Anat Rec B New Anat. 2005 May;284(1):17-21.

10.

Critical comparison of 31 commercially available digital slide systems in pathology.

Rojo MG, García GB, Mateos CP, García JG, Vicente MC.

Int J Surg Pathol. 2006 Oct;14(4):285-305.

PMID:
17041192
11.

The choice of microscopes for use in genitourinary medicine clinics.

Cremer AW.

Genitourin Med. 1990 Jun;66(3):222-5. Review.

12.

Evaluation of portable CT scanners for otologic image-guided surgery.

Balachandran R, Schurzig D, Fitzpatrick JM, Labadie RF.

Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2012 Mar;7(2):315-21. doi: 10.1007/s11548-011-0639-4. Epub 2011 Jul 21.

13.

Virtual non-contrast dual-energy CT compared to single-energy CT of the urinary tract: a prospective study.

Lundin M, Lidén M, Magnuson A, Mohammed AA, Geijer H, Andersson T, Persson A.

Acta Radiol. 2012 Jul;53(6):689-94. doi: 10.1258/ar.2012.110661.

PMID:
22798385
14.

[Evaluation of image quality of two different three-dimensional cone-beam-scanners used for orthopedic surgery in the bony structures of the pelvis in comparison with standard CT scans].

Stuby F, Seethaler AC, Shiozawa T, Weise K, Mroue A, Badke A, Buchgeister M, Ochs BG.

Z Orthop Unfall. 2011 Dec;149(6):659-67. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1271136. Epub 2011 May 17. German.

PMID:
21590660
15.

Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center.

Pantanowitz L, Sinard JH, Henricks WH, Fatheree LA, Carter AB, Contis L, Beckwith BA, Evans AJ, Lal A, Parwani AV; College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center..

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013 Dec;137(12):1710-22. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0093-CP. Epub 2013 May 1. Review.

PMID:
23634907
16.

Accuracy of four different digital intraoral scanners: effects of the presence of orthodontic brackets and wire.

Jung YR, Park JM, Chun YS, Lee KN, Kim M.

Int J Comput Dent. 2016;19(3):203-15.

PMID:
27644178
17.

Does a combination of dose modulation with fast gantry rotation time limit CT image quality?

Israel GM, Herlihy S, Rubinowitz AN, Cornfeld D, Brink J.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Jul;191(1):140-4. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3019.

PMID:
18562737
18.

Detection accuracy of proximal caries by phosphor plate and cone-beam computerized tomography images scanned with different resolutions.

Cheng JG, Zhang ZL, Wang XY, Zhang ZY, Ma XC, Li G.

Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Aug;16(4):1015-21. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0599-7. Epub 2011 Jul 30.

PMID:
21805053
19.

[Creating low-power photomicrographs by digital scanning of histological sections].

Ventura L, Chiominto A, Colimberti P, Sarra M, Dal Mas A, Leocata P.

Pathologica. 2000 Feb;92(1):9-12. Review. Italian.

PMID:
10842994
20.

Answer to comment on the editorial 'Should hematologists put there microscopes on eBay?'.

van 't Veer M, Haferlach T.

Haematologica. 2015 Jan;100(1):e41. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.120063. No abstract available.

Supplemental Content

Support Center