Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 100

1.

Kinship index variations among populations and thresholds for familial searching.

Ge J, Budowle B.

PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037474. Epub 2012 May 16.

2.

Comparisons of familial DNA database searching strategies.

Ge J, Chakraborty R, Eisenberg A, Budowle B.

J Forensic Sci. 2011 Nov;56(6):1448-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01867.x. Epub 2011 Aug 9. Erratum in: J Forensic Sci. 2012 Jan;57(1):283.

PMID:
21827463
3.

Use of sibling pairs to determine the familial searching efficiency of forensic databases.

Reid TM, Baird ML, Reid JP, Lee SC, Lee RF.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2008 Sep;2(4):340-2. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.04.008. Epub 2008 Jun 12.

PMID:
19083845
4.

Familial searching on DNA mixtures with dropout.

Slooten K.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 May;22:128-38. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 22.

PMID:
26905597
5.

Familial identification: population structure and relationship distinguishability.

Rohlfs RV, Fullerton SM, Weir BS.

PLoS Genet. 2012 Feb;8(2):e1002469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002469. Epub 2012 Feb 9.

6.

Familial searching: a specialist forensic DNA profiling service utilising the National DNA Database to identify unknown offenders via their relatives--the UK experience.

Maguire CN, McCallum LA, Storey C, Whitaker JP.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014 Jan;8(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Sep 7.

PMID:
24315582
7.

Optimal strategies for familial searching.

Kruijver M, Meester R, Slooten K.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014 Nov;13:90-103. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.06.010. Epub 2014 Jul 12.

PMID:
25082141
8.

Effectiveness of familial searches.

Curran JM, Buckleton JS.

Sci Justice. 2008 Dec;48(4):164-7. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2008.04.004.

PMID:
19192677
9.

Decision-making in familial database searching: KI alone or not alone?

Balding DJ, Krawczak M, Buckleton JS, Curran JM.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013 Jan;7(1):52-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jun 29.

PMID:
22749791
10.

Genotyping and interpretation of STR-DNA: Low-template, mixtures and database matches-Twenty years of research and development.

Gill P, Haned H, Bleka O, Hansson O, Dørum G, Egeland T.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 Sep;18:100-17. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.03.014. Epub 2015 Mar 27. Review.

PMID:
25866376
11.

The effect of wild card designations and rare alleles in forensic DNA database searches.

Tvedebrink T, Bright JA, Buckleton JS, Curran JM, Morling N.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 May;16:98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 16.

PMID:
25576850
12.

[Development of Chinese forensic Y-STR DNA database].

Ge JY, Yan JW, Xie Q, Sun HY, Zhou HG, Li B.

Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Jun;29(3):212-5, 221. Review. Chinese.

PMID:
24303768
13.

The first successful use of a low stringency familial match in a French criminal investigation.

Pham-Hoai E, Crispino F, Hampikian G.

J Forensic Sci. 2014 May;59(3):816-9. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12372. Epub 2014 Feb 6.

PMID:
24502416
14.

Searching for first-degree familial relationships in California's offender DNA database: validation of a likelihood ratio-based approach.

Myers SP, Timken MD, Piucci ML, Sims GA, Greenwald MA, Weigand JJ, Konzak KC, Buoncristiani MR.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2011 Nov;5(5):493-500. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.10.010. Epub 2010 Nov 5.

PMID:
21056023
15.

The influence of relatives on the efficiency and error rate of familial searching.

Rohlfs RV, Murphy E, Song YS, Slatkin M.

PLoS One. 2013 Aug 14;8(8):e70495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070495. eCollection 2013. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2014;9(1). doi:10.1371/annotation/2544c2e3-0065-4d14-ab1c-3d3fcb0fee84.

16.

Practical applications of genotypic surveys for forensic STR testing.

Holt CL, Stauffer C, Wallin JM, Lazaruk KD, Nguyen T, Budowle B, Walsh PS.

Forensic Sci Int. 2000 Aug 14;112(2-3):91-109.

PMID:
10940595
17.

A simple method for establishing concordance between short-tandem-repeat allele frequency databases.

Condel K, Al Salih M.

Transfusion. 2011 May;51(5):986-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02899.x. Epub 2010 Oct 4.

PMID:
20946195
18.

Pedigree likelihood ratio for lineage markers.

Ge J, Eisenberg A, Yan J, Chakraborty R, Budowle B.

Int J Legal Med. 2011 Jul;125(4):519-25. doi: 10.1007/s00414-010-0514-9. Epub 2010 Sep 21.

PMID:
20857132
19.

Comparison of southern Chinese Han and Brazilian Caucasian mutation rates at autosomal short tandem repeat loci used in human forensic genetics.

Sun H, Liu S, Zhang Y, Whittle MR.

Int J Legal Med. 2014 Jan;128(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s00414-013-0847-2. Epub 2013 Apr 3.

PMID:
23549598
20.

Inferring ancestral origin using a single multiplex assay of ancestry-informative marker SNPs.

Phillips C, Salas A, Sánchez JJ, Fondevila M, Gómez-Tato A, Alvarez-Dios J, Calaza M, de Cal MC, Ballard D, Lareu MV, Carracedo A; SNPforID Consortium..

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2007 Dec;1(3-4):273-80. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2007.06.008. Epub 2007 Aug 22.

PMID:
19083773

Supplemental Content

Support Center