Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 75

1.

What does it mean to "employ" the RE-AIM model?

Kessler RS, Purcell EP, Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Benkeser RM, Peek CJ.

Eval Health Prof. 2013 Mar;36(1):44-66. doi: 10.1177/0163278712446066. Epub 2012 May 21.

PMID:
22615498
2.

Updating, employing, and adapting: a commentary on What does it mean to "employ" the RE-AIM model.

Estabrooks PA, Allen KC.

Eval Health Prof. 2013 Mar;36(1):67-72. doi: 10.1177/0163278712460546. Epub 2012 Oct 8.

PMID:
23045308
3.

An application of a new evidence grading system to research on the chronic care model.

Gugiu PC, Westine CD, Coryn CL, Hobson KA.

Eval Health Prof. 2013 Mar;36(1):3-43. doi: 10.1177/0163278712436968. Epub 2012 Apr 3.

PMID:
22473325
4.

Fidelity to and comparative results across behavioral interventions evaluated through the RE-AIM framework: a systematic review.

Harden SM, Gaglio B, Shoup JA, Kinney KA, Johnson SB, Brito F, Blackman KC, Zoellner JM, Hill JL, Almeida FA, Glasgow RE, Estabrooks PA.

Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 8;4:155. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0141-0. Review.

5.

Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.

Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.

PMID:
18987905
6.

Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.

Chilcott J, Tappenden P, Rawdin A, Johnson M, Kaltenthaler E, Paisley S, Papaioannou D, Shippam A.

Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250. Review.

7.

[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25. German.

PMID:
19034813
9.

Research to reality: a process evaluation of a mini-grants program to disseminate evidence-based nutrition programs to rural churches and worksites.

Honeycutt S, Carvalho M, Glanz K, Daniel SD, Kegler MC.

J Public Health Manag Pract. 2012 Sep-Oct;18(5):431-9. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31822d4c69.

PMID:
22836534
10.

An evidence-based guide to writing grant proposals for clinical research.

Inouye SK, Fiellin DA.

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Feb 15;142(4):274-82.

PMID:
15710960
11.

Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.

Jardine C, Hrudey S, Shortreed J, Craig L, Krewski D, Furgal C, McColl S.

J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. Review.

PMID:
14698953
12.

Translating and disseminating research- and practice-based criteria to support evidence-based intervention planning.

Baker EA, Brennan Ramirez LK, Claus JM, Land G.

J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008 Mar-Apr;14(2):124-30. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000311889.83380.9b.

PMID:
18287917
13.

Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.

Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM.

Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7. Review.

14.
15.

Opportunities for small nutrition-related cancer research grants (R03) from the National Cancer Institute.

Nicastro HL, Seifried HE, Milner JA.

J Nutr. 2011 Oct;141(10):1765-8. doi: 10.3945/jn.111.144261. Epub 2011 Aug 24. Review.

16.

Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs: using the RE-AIM framework to form summary measures for decision making involving complex issues.

Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Vogt TM.

Health Educ Res. 2006 Oct;21(5):688-94. Epub 2006 Aug 31.

PMID:
16945984
17.

Connecting community with campus to address cancer health disparities: a community grants program model.

Vines AI, Teal R, Meyer C, Manning M, Godley P.

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2011 Summer;5(2):207-12. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2011.0027.

18.

Applying the RE-AIM framework to assess the public health impact of policy change.

Jilcott S, Ammerman A, Sommers J, Glasgow RE.

Ann Behav Med. 2007 Oct;34(2):105-14.

PMID:
17927550
19.

Dissemination and implementation research on community-based cancer prevention: a systematic review.

Rabin BA, Glasgow RE, Kerner JF, Klump MP, Brownson RC.

Am J Prev Med. 2010 Apr;38(4):443-56. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.035. Review.

PMID:
20307814
20.

Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.

Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacoot N, Glanville J.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center