Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 117

1.

Accuracy of physician and nurse practitioner colposcopy to effect improved surveillance of cervical cancer.

Kilic G, England J, Borahay M, Pedraza D, Freeman D, Snyder R, Ertan AK.

Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2012;33(2):183-6.

PMID:
22611960
2.

Influence of specialty on pathology resource use in evaluation of cervical dysplasia.

Shackelford DP, Griffin D, Hoffman MK, Jones DE.

Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Nov;94(5 Pt 1):709-12.

PMID:
10546715
3.

Correlations between unsatisfactory colposcopy, cytology, and biopsy in patients with cervical abnormalities.

Lambert B, Lepage Y.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007 Oct;86(10):1269-72.

PMID:
17851823
4.

[Clinical efficacy of a new method for LEEP conization with pistol-shaped electroknife].

Kovachev S, Nacheva A, Atanassova V, Piperkova N, Kostov I, Vasilev N.

Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2010;49(5):20-5. Bulgarian.

PMID:
21268398
5.

Interpretability of excisional biopsies of the cervix: cone biopsy and loop excision.

Miroshnichenko GG, Parva M, Holtz DO, Klemens JA, Dunton CJ.

J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2009 Jan;13(1):10-2. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31817ff940.

PMID:
19098600
6.

Correlation between colposcopically directed biopsy and cervical loop excision.

Massad LS, Halperin CJ, Bitterman P.

Gynecol Oncol. 1996 Mar;60(3):400-3.

PMID:
8774646
8.

Treatment of cervical dysplasia with the Fischer cone biopsy excisor in a family medicine office: a case series.

Mulhem E, Kennedy EL, Lick D.

J Am Board Fam Med. 2010 Mar-Apr;23(2):154-8. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.02.090002.

9.

A LEEP cervical conization is rarely indicated for a two-step discrepancy.

Lanneau GS, Skaggs V, Moore K, Stowell S, Zuna R, Gold MA.

J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2007 Jul;11(3):134-7.

PMID:
17596756
10.

Recurrence of dysplasia after loop electrosurgical excision procedures with long-term follow-up.

Gonzalez DI Jr, Zahn CM, Retzloff MG, Moore WF, Kost ER, Snyder RR.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Feb;184(3):315-21.

PMID:
11228480
11.

Early cervical neoplasia confirmed by conization: diagnostic accuracy of cytology, colposcopy and punch biopsy.

Matsuura Y, Kawagoe T, Toki N, Sugihara K, Kashimura M.

Acta Cytol. 1996 Mar-Apr;40(2):241-6.

PMID:
8629405
12.

The clinical significance of a negative loop electrosurgical cone biopsy for high-grade dysplasia.

Livasy CA, Moore DT, Van Le L.

Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Aug;104(2):250-4.

PMID:
15291995
13.
14.

The significance of positive margins in loop electrosurgical cone biopsies.

Felix JC, Muderspach LI, Duggan BD, Roman LD.

Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Dec;84(6):996-1000.

PMID:
7970484
15.

Electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone: the experience of family physicians.

Ferris DG, Hainer BL, Pfenninger JL, Zuber TJ, DeWitt DE, Line RL.

J Fam Pract. 1995 Oct;41(4):337-44.

PMID:
7561706
16.

The volume perspective: a comparison of two excisional treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (laser versus LLETZ).

Phadnis SV, Atilade A, Young MP, Evans H, Walker PG.

BJOG. 2010 Apr;117(5):615-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02501.x. Epub 2010 Feb 15.

17.

Keratinizing squamous dysplasia pap test: a case for colposcopy.

Boggs EW, Burgis JT, Spiryda LB.

J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2012 Jan;16(1):30-3. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31822d3846.

PMID:
22126829
18.

Management of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions during pregnancy.

Jain AG, Higgins RV, Boyle MJ.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Aug;177(2):298-302.

PMID:
9290443
19.
20.

Follow-up compliance of adolescents with cervical dysplasia in an inner-city population.

Campbell FN, Lara-Torre E.

J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2009 Jun;22(3):151-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2008.08.003.

PMID:
19539200

Supplemental Content

Support Center