Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 216

1.

Primary vitrectomy versus scleral buckling for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.

Sun Q, Sun T, Xu Y, Yang XL, Xu X, Wang BS, Nishimura T, Heimann H.

Curr Eye Res. 2012 Jun;37(6):492-9. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2012.663854.

PMID:
22577767
2.

Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study.

Heimann H, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Bornfeld N, Weiss C, Hilgers RD, Foerster MH; Scleral Buckling versus Primary Vitrectomy in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Study Group..

Ophthalmology. 2007 Dec;114(12):2142-54.

PMID:
18054633
3.

Surgical management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Soni C, Hainsworth DP, Almony A.

Ophthalmology. 2013 Jul;120(7):1440-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.12.033. Epub 2013 Mar 16.

PMID:
23511114
4.
5.

Pars plana vitrectomy versus combined pars plana vitrectomy-scleral buckle for primary repair of pseudophakic retinal detachment.

Weichel ED, Martidis A, Fineman MS, McNamara JA, Park CH, Vander JF, Ho AC, Brown GC.

Ophthalmology. 2006 Nov;113(11):2033-40.

PMID:
17074564
6.

Anatomic and visual outcomes of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachment: six-month follow-up results of a single operation--report no. 1.

Ahmadieh H, Moradian S, Faghihi H, Parvaresh MM, Ghanbari H, Mehryar M, Heidari E, Behboudi H, Banaee T, Golestan B; Pseudophakic and Aphakic Retinal Detachment (PARD) Study Group..

Ophthalmology. 2005 Aug;112(8):1421-9.

PMID:
15961159
7.

Surgical management of pseudophakic retinal detachments: a meta-analysis.

Arya AV, Emerson JW, Engelbert M, Hagedorn CL, Adelman RA.

Ophthalmology. 2006 Oct;113(10):1724-33.

PMID:
17011954
8.

Primary vitrectomy versus conventional retinal detachment surgery in phakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Azad RV, Chanana B, Sharma YR, Vohra R.

Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007 Aug;85(5):540-5. Epub 2007 Mar 9.

9.
10.

Anatomical and functional outcome following primary retinal re-attachment surgery in phakic and pseudophakic rhegmatogenesis retinal detachment.

Asghar A, ur Rehman A, Jafri WH, Zaman Y, Bhatti N, ul Hassan M.

J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2010 Jul-Sep;22(3):120-3.

PMID:
22338435
11.

An evidence-based analysis of surgical interventions for uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Saw SM, Gazzard G, Wagle AM, Lim J, Au Eong KG.

Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006 Oct;84(5):606-12. Review.

12.

Pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckle versus pars plana vitrectomy alone for patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment at high risk for proliferative vitreoretinopathy.

Storey P, Alshareef R, Khuthaila M, London N, Leiby B, DeCroos C, Kaiser R; Wills PVR Study Group..

Retina. 2014 Oct;34(10):1945-51. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000216.

PMID:
24999720
13.

Combined pars plana vitrectomy-scleral buckle versus pars plana vitrectomy for proliferative vitreoretinopathy.

Lai FH, Lo EC, Chan VC, Brelen M, Lo WL, Young AL.

Int Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;36(2):217-24. doi: 10.1007/s10792-015-0104-4. Epub 2015 Aug 11.

PMID:
26260357
14.

Functional and anatomic outcome of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic retinal detachment.

Sharma YR, Karunanithi S, Azad RV, Vohra R, Pal N, Singh DV, Chandra P.

Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2005 Jun;83(3):293-7.

15.

Management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with inferior breaks.

Sharma A, Grigoropoulos V, Williamson TH.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Nov;88(11):1372-5.

16.

[Anaylsis of the surgeon factor in the treatment results of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in the "scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study"].

Heimann H, Bornfeld N, Bartz-Schmidt UK, Hilgers RD, Heussen N.

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2009 Dec;226(12):991-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1109873. Epub 2009 Dec 15. German.

PMID:
20108194
17.

A propensity score matching application: indications and results of adding scleral buckle to vitrectomy: The Retina 1 Project: Report 3.

Sanabria MR, Fernández I, Sala-Puigdollers A, Rojas J, Alfaiate M, Elizalde J, Navea A, Cordoves L, Ruiz-Miguel M, Diaz-Llopis M, Coco RM, De La Rúa ER, Pastor JC.

Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar-Apr;22(2):244-53. doi: 10.5301/EJO.2011.6528.

18.

Visual recovery after scleral buckling surgery in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Liu F, Meyer CH, Mennel S, Hoerle S, Kroll P.

Ophthalmologica. 2006;220(3):174-80.

PMID:
16679792
19.

Outcomes of surgery for retinal detachment associated with proliferative vitreoretinopathy using perfluoro-n-octane: a multicenter study.

Scott IU, Flynn HW Jr, Murray TG, Feuer WJ; Perfluoron study group..

Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Sep;136(3):454-63.

PMID:
12967798
20.

Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (SPR Study): design issues and implications. SPR Study report no. 1.

Heimann H, Hellmich M, Bornfeld N, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Hilgers RD, Foerster MH.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001 Aug;239(8):567-74.

PMID:
11585312

Supplemental Content

Support Center