Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 225

1.

Why complexity and entropy matter: information, posttranslational modifications, and assay fidelity.

Sherman J, Molloy MP, Burlingame AL.

Proteomics. 2012 Apr;12(8):1147-50. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201100459.

PMID:
22577016
2.

pep2pro: a new tool for comprehensive proteome data analysis to reveal information about organ-specific proteomes in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Baerenfaller K, Hirsch-Hoffmann M, Svozil J, Hull R, Russenberger D, Bischof S, Lu Q, Gruissem W, Baginsky S.

Integr Biol (Camb). 2011 Mar;3(3):225-37. doi: 10.1039/c0ib00078g.

PMID:
21264403
3.

Quantify this! Report on a round table discussion on quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics.

Quadroni M, Ducret A, Stöcklin R.

Proteomics. 2004 Aug;4(8):2211-5.

PMID:
15274113
5.

Analytical utility of mass spectral binning in proteomic experiments by SPectral Immonium Ion Detection (SPIID).

Kelstrup CD, Frese C, Heck AJ, Olsen JV, Nielsen ML.

Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014 Aug;13(8):1914-24. doi: 10.1074/mcp.O113.035915.

6.

A novel approach for untargeted post-translational modification identification using integer linear optimization and tandem mass spectrometry.

Baliban RC, DiMaggio PA, Plazas-Mayorca MD, Young NL, Garcia BA, Floudas CA.

Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010 May;9(5):764-79. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M900487-MCP200.

7.

De novo sequencing methods in proteomics.

Hughes C, Ma B, Lajoie GA.

Methods Mol Biol. 2010;604:105-21. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-444-9_8.

PMID:
20013367
8.

Development and validation of a spectral library searching method for peptide identification from MS/MS.

Lam H, Deutsch EW, Eddes JS, Eng JK, King N, Stein SE, Aebersold R.

Proteomics. 2007 Mar;7(5):655-67.

PMID:
17295354
9.
10.

Recent developments in proteome informatics for mass spectrometry analysis.

Wright JC, Hubbard SJ.

Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2009 Feb;12(2):194-202. Review.

PMID:
19199887
12.

Correlation of multiple peptide mass spectra for phosphoprotein identification.

Feng J, Garrett WM, Naiman DQ, Cooper B.

J Proteome Res. 2009 Nov;8(11):5396-405. doi: 10.1021/pr900596u.

PMID:
19719328
13.

From proteome lists to biological impact--tools and strategies for the analysis of large MS data sets.

Malik R, Dulla K, Nigg EA, Körner R.

Proteomics. 2010 Mar;10(6):1270-83. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200900365. Review.

PMID:
20077408
14.

Improving peptide identification using an empirical peptide retention time database.

Sun W, Zhang L, Yang R, Shao C, Zhang Z, Gao Y.

Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2009 Jan;23(1):109-18. doi: 10.1002/rcm.3851.

PMID:
19065623
15.

Comprehensive identification of novel post-translational modifications in cellular peroxiredoxin 6.

Jeong J, Kim Y, Kyung Seong J, Lee KJ.

Proteomics. 2012 May;12(9):1452-62. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201100558.

PMID:
22589192
16.

More than 100,000 detectable peptide species elute in single shotgun proteomics runs but the majority is inaccessible to data-dependent LC-MS/MS.

Michalski A, Cox J, Mann M.

J Proteome Res. 2011 Apr 1;10(4):1785-93. doi: 10.1021/pr101060v.

PMID:
21309581
17.

Scaffold: a bioinformatic tool for validating MS/MS-based proteomic studies.

Searle BC.

Proteomics. 2010 Mar;10(6):1265-9. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200900437.

PMID:
20077414
19.

Protein identification by tandem mass spectrometry and sequence database searching.

Nesvizhskii AI.

Methods Mol Biol. 2007;367:87-119. Review.

PMID:
17185772
20.

Peptide mass fingerprinting.

Thiede B, Höhenwarter W, Krah A, Mattow J, Schmid M, Schmidt F, Jungblut PR.

Methods. 2005 Mar;35(3):237-47. Review.

PMID:
15722220
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center