Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 227

1.

An evaluation of the quality of statistical design and analysis of published medical research: results from a systematic survey of general orthopaedic journals.

Parsons NR, Price CL, Hiskens R, Achten J, Costa ML.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Apr 25;12:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-60. Review.

2.

A systematic survey of the quality of research reporting in general orthopaedic journals.

Parsons NR, Hiskens R, Price CL, Achten J, Costa ML.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Sep;93(9):1154-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B9.27193. Review. Erratum in: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Dec;93(12):1680.

PMID:
21911523
3.

Risk of bias of randomized controlled trials published in orthopaedic journals.

Chess LE, Gagnier J.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Jun 9;13:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-76.

4.

A quality assessment of randomized clinical trials in pediatric orthopaedics.

Dulai SK, Slobogean BL, Beauchamp RD, Mulpuri K.

J Pediatr Orthop. 2007 Jul-Aug;27(5):573-81.

PMID:
17585270
5.

Reporting randomized, controlled trials: where quality of reporting may be improved.

Ko CY, Sack J, Chang JT, Fink A.

Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Apr;45(4):443-7.

PMID:
12006922
6.

Assessing quality of reports on randomized clinical trials in nursing journals.

Parent N, Hanley JA.

Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009;19(2):25-39. English, French.

PMID:
19517902
7.

Improving the quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surgery: the way forward.

Tiruvoipati R, Balasubramanian SP, Atturu G, Peek GJ, Elbourne D.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Aug;132(2):233-40.

9.

Eyes or subjects: are ophthalmic randomized controlled trials properly designed and analyzed?

Lee CF, Cheng AC, Fong DY.

Ophthalmology. 2012 Apr;119(4):869-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.025. Epub 2012 Jan 9. Review.

PMID:
22226885
10.

The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.

Berwanger O, Ribeiro RA, Finkelsztejn A, Watanabe M, Suzumura EA, Duncan BB, Devereaux PJ, Cook D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;62(4):387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Nov 17. Review.

PMID:
19010643
11.

A retrospective survey of research design and statistical analyses in selected Chinese medical journals in 1998 and 2008.

Jin Z, Yu D, Zhang L, Meng H, Lu J, Gao Q, Cao Y, Ma X, Wu C, He Q, Wang R, He J.

PLoS One. 2010 May 25;5(5):e10822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010822.

12.

Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?

Poolman RW, Struijs PA, Krips R, Sierevelt IN, Lutz KH, Bhandari M.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Sep 11;6:44.

13.

Reported methodological quality of split-mouth studies.

Lesaffre E, Garcia Zattera MJ, Redmond C, Huber H, Needleman I; ISCB Subcommittee on Dentistry.

J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Sep;34(9):756-61. Review.

PMID:
17716311
14.

Statistics in orthopaedic papers.

Petrie A.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Sep;88(9):1121-36. Review.

15.

Reporting on statistical methods to adjust for confounding: a cross-sectional survey.

Müllner M, Matthews H, Altman DG.

Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jan 15;136(2):122-6.

PMID:
11790063
16.

Validity of the impact factor of journals as a measure of randomized controlled trial quality.

Barbui C, Cipriani A, Malvini L, Tansella M.

J Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;67(1):37-40.

PMID:
16426086
17.

A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in the urology literature.

Scales CD Jr, Norris RD, Keitz SA, Peterson BL, Preminger GM, Vieweg J, Dahm P.

J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):1090-4; discussion 1094-5.

PMID:
17296417
18.

Improvement in the quality of randomized controlled trials among general anesthesiology journals 2000 to 2006: a 6-year follow-up.

Greenfield ML, Mhyre JM, Mashour GA, Blum JM, Yen EC, Rosenberg AL.

Anesth Analg. 2009 Jun;108(6):1916-21. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819fe6d7.

PMID:
19448222
19.

Publications by the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Urology: the quality of research design and statistical methodology.

Afshar K, Jafari S, Seth A, Lee JK, MacNeily AE.

J Urol. 2009 Oct;182(4 Suppl):1906-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.066. Epub 2009 Aug 20.

PMID:
19695587
20.

Data presentation and the use of statistical tests in biomedical journals: can we reach a consensus?

Evans RG, Su DF.

Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2011 May;38(5):285-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2011.05508.x. No abstract available.

PMID:
21388434

Supplemental Content

Support Center