Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 1959

1.

Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.

Zhu Q, Itshayek E, Jones CF, Schwab T, Larson CR, Lenke LG, Cripton PA.

Eur Spine J. 2012 Jun;21 Suppl 5:S599-611. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2301-4. Epub 2012 Apr 25.

2.

Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Erkan S, Rivera Y, Wu C, Mehbod AA, Transfeldt EE.

Spine J. 2009 Oct;9(10):830-5. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.04.014. Epub 2009 May 28.

PMID:
19477692
3.

Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns.

O'Leary P, Nicolakis M, Lorenz MA, Voronov LI, Zindrick MR, Ghanayem A, Havey RM, Carandang G, Sartori M, Gaitanis IN, Fronczak S, Patwardhan AG.

Spine J. 2005 Nov-Dec;5(6):590-9.

PMID:
16291097
4.

Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination.

Grauer JN, Biyani A, Faizan A, Kiapour A, Sairyo K, Ivanov A, Ebraheim NA, Patel TCh, Goel VK.

Spine J. 2006 Nov-Dec;6(6):659-66. Epub 2006 Oct 10.

PMID:
17088196
5.

Biomechanical comparison of lumbar total disc arthroplasty, discectomy, and fusion: effect on adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force.

Gao SG, Lei GH, He HB, Liu H, Xiao WF, Wen T, Liang JY, Li KH.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Nov;15(5):507-14. doi: 10.3171/2011.6.SPINE11250. Epub 2011 Jul 22.

PMID:
21780862
6.

Hybrid testing of lumbar CHARITE discs versus fusions.

Panjabi M, Malcolmson G, Teng E, Tominaga Y, Henderson G, Serhan H.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Apr 20;32(9):959-66; discussion 967.

PMID:
17450069
7.

The biomechanics of a multilevel lumbar spine hybrid using nucleus replacement in conjunction with fusion.

Dahl MC, Ellingson AM, Mehta HP, Huelman JH, Nuckley DJ.

Spine J. 2013 Feb;13(2):175-83. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.11.045. Epub 2013 Jan 11.

PMID:
23318109
8.

Biomechanical evaluation of a new AxiaLIF technique for two-level lumbar fusion.

Erkan S, Wu C, Mehbod AA, Hsu B, Pahl DW, Transfeldt EE.

Eur Spine J. 2009 Jun;18(6):807-14. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0953-5. Epub 2009 Apr 8.

9.

Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures: a biomechanical perspective.

Cunningham BW, Hu N, Beatson HJ, Serhan H, Sefter JC, McAfee PC.

Spine J. 2009 Sep;9(9):735-43. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.011. Epub 2009 May 28.

PMID:
19477694
10.

Segmental motion adjacent to an instrumented lumbar fusion: the effect of extension of fusion to the sacrum.

Untch C, Liu Q, Hart R.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Nov 1;29(21):2376-81.

PMID:
15507798
11.

Controlled motion with the XL-TDR lateral-approach lumbar total disk replacement: in vitro kinematic investigation.

Pimenta L, Turner A, Oliveira L, Marchi L, Cornwall B.

J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2015 Mar;76(2):133-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1394187. Epub 2014 Dec 29. Erratum in: J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2015 Jul;76(4):337-8.

PMID:
25545808
12.

Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.

Demetropoulos CK, Sengupta DK, Knaub MA, Wiater BP, Abjornson C, Truumees E, Herkowitz HN.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jan 1;35(1):26-31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c4eb9a.

PMID:
20042953
13.

Effects of charité artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol.

Goel VK, Grauer JN, Patel TCh, Biyani A, Sairyo K, Vishnubhotla S, Matyas A, Cowgill I, Shaw M, Long R, Dick D, Panjabi MM, Serhan H.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Dec 15;30(24):2755-64.

PMID:
16371899
14.

Multidirectional testing of one- and two-level ProDisc-L versus simulated fusions.

Panjabi M, Henderson G, Abjornson C, Yue J.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 May 20;32(12):1311-9.

PMID:
17515820
15.

Hybrid dynamic stabilization: a biomechanical assessment of adjacent and supraadjacent levels of the lumbar spine.

Mageswaran P, Techy F, Colbrunn RW, Bonner TF, McLain RF.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Sep;17(3):232-42. doi: 10.3171/2012.6.SPINE111054. Epub 2012 Jul 27.

PMID:
22839756
16.

Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: part I. Biomechanical effects on lumbar spinal motion.

Strube P, Tohtz S, Hoff E, Gross C, Perka C, Putzier M.

Eur Spine J. 2010 Dec;19(12):2171-80. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1549-9. Epub 2010 Aug 4.

17.

Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels.

Auerbach JD, Jones KJ, Milby AH, Anakwenze OA, Balderston RA.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Nov 1;34(23):2510-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181af2622.

PMID:
19927100
18.

Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study.

Niosi CA, Zhu QA, Wilson DC, Keynan O, Wilson DR, Oxland TR.

Eur Spine J. 2006 Jun;15(6):913-22. Epub 2005 Oct 11.

19.

Quantification of intradiscal pressures below thoracolumbar spinal fusion constructs: is there evidence to support "saving a level"?

Auerbach JD, Lonner BS, Errico TJ, Freeman A, Goerke D, Beaubien BP.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Mar 1;37(5):359-66. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821e1106.

PMID:
21540780
20.

Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on the operative- and adjacent-level kinematics and intradiscal pressures: an in vitro human cadaveric assessment.

Dmitriev AE, Gill NW, Kuklo TR, Rosner MK.

Spine J. 2008 Nov-Dec;8(6):918-25. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.034. Epub 2008 Jan 7.

PMID:
18178528

Supplemental Content

Support Center